On 1/5/21 3:53 pm, Anthony K wrote:
On 29/4/21 11:55 pm, R C wrote:
...
I was able to build/compile the drivers with
NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-460.73.01.run on 4.18.0-240.22.1.el8_3.x86_64, it
gave me a warning about pkcfg, but no other warnings/errors and seem
to install, however, after booting it
On 29/4/21 11:55 pm, R C wrote:
...
I was able to build/compile the drivers with
NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-460.73.01.run on 4.18.0-240.22.1.el8_3.x86_64, it
gave me a warning about pkcfg, but no other warnings/errors and seem
to install, however, after booting it still didn't use that driver,
but t
from what I heard,
nftables doesn't support forward rules yet, until RHEL/Centos 8.5 at
this time it can be "resolved" using iptables as the firewall backend,
but not nftables (which is not ideal, but ... ) .
Ron
On 4/30/21 10:19 PM, Anthony K wrote:
On 1/5/21 2:15 pm, Anthony K wrote:
On 1/5/21 2:15 pm, Anthony K wrote:
On 26/4/21 8:42 am, R C wrote:
...
for example; if I do "ping www.google.com" I get a "ping
www.google.com: Name or service not known" If I use an IP address
(from www.google.com), it just works.
Sometimes seeing the traffic flow reveals what's really g
On 26/4/21 8:42 am, R C wrote:
...
for example; if I do "ping www.google.com" I get a "ping
www.google.com: Name or service not known" If I use an IP address
(from www.google.com), it just works.
Sometimes seeing the traffic flow reveals what's really going on. To
that end, run command be
Il 2021-04-30 21:16 Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
Critics of Stream often argue that CentOS users are losing support
that CentOS never had to begin with. Their argument implies that
CentOS has aspects of RHEL that it does not. They are not correct.
From here [1]:
"Since March 2004, CentOS Linux
This will be fully OT.
On 4/30/21 12:53 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 4/30/21 6:19 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Why do, you, people use “creative editing”? Cite the whole piece I
said, and place your question there, don’t tear single phrase out of
context.
It's not "creative editing", it's quot
On 4/30/21 11:36 AM, R C wrote:
No, I think you've completely missed the point that I was making,
which was simply that criticism of CentOS Stream often mistakenly
argues that because of the change, users of CentOS lose things that
they never had to begin with.
I don't know for sure if that a
On 4/30/21 12:53 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 4/30/21 6:19 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Why do, you, people use “creative editing”? Cite the whole piece I
said, and place your question there, don’t tear single phrase out of
context.
It's not "creative editing", it's quote trimming in a forum
On 4/30/21 12:20 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 4/30/21 11:03 AM, R C wrote:
CentOS has *never* had support from Red Hat.
So what is it you expect?, get an enterprise quality OS for free, and
also expect highly paid, expensive, engineers to support your need
for assistance on a whim for free
On 4/30/21 11:03 AM, R C wrote:
CentOS has *never* had support from Red Hat.
So what is it you expect?, get an enterprise quality OS for free, and
also expect highly paid, expensive, engineers to support your need for
assistance on a whim for free too?
No, I think you've completely missed
.
.
.
%<
CentOS has *never* had support from Red Hat. If you want to run a
stable, supported production environment while you complete testing of
a new minor release, you can get that from RHEL but not CentOS. If
you want to apply only security updates to a production environment to
re
On 4/30/21 6:19 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Why do, you, people use “creative editing”? Cite the whole piece I said, and
place your question there, don’t tear single phrase out of context.
It's not "creative editing", it's quote trimming in a forum which
provides threaded discussions. It's th
On 4/30/21 2:32 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote:
Don't get me wrong: I understand that Stream is the way forward and
that things are not going to change, and this is fine. But trying to
ignore the key differences (shorter support, unknown upgrade from
Stream-8 to Stream-9, broken kABI, etc) is not u
Il 2021-04-30 16:26 Johnny Hughes ha scritto:
On 4/30/21 4:32 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote:
Il 2021-04-30 06:55 Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
Why do you think that? Are RHEL (and CentOS) point releases backward
compatible or not? If you trust point releases to work, why would
you
hesitate to trust
On 4/30/21 4:32 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> Il 2021-04-30 06:55 Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
>> Why do you think that? Are RHEL (and CentOS) point releases backward
>> compatible or not? If you trust point releases to work, why would you
>> hesitate to trust a distribution that resembles an upcomin
> On Apr 29, 2021, at 11:55 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> On 4/29/21 8:51 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> but in the second case I can not put my reputation at stake and finish my
>> phrase with "whatever works on RedHat Enterprise will work on CentOS".
> Why do you think that? Are RHEL (and
Il 2021-04-30 06:55 Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
Why do you think that? Are RHEL (and CentOS) point releases backward
compatible or not? If you trust point releases to work, why would you
hesitate to trust a distribution that resembles an upcoming point
release?
Because it very often break kABI
18 matches
Mail list logo