--- On Fri, 2012/3/30, Nataraj wrote:
> I have poked around in google and have seen a number of youtube videos,
> but my question is whether anyone really has linux running on any kind
> of tablet or tablet PC device in such a way that the touch screen can be
> used productively and it won't ta
On 01/12/2012 04:49 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>> On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 01:22:05 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> I don't think of myself as a 'normal user', but I still don't
>>> appreciate it when a distribution goes out of its way to arbitrar
On 01/12/2012 03:48 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> In Fedora we currently dontaudit this leak.
>
> audit2allow -i /tmp/t
>
>
> #= httpd_sys_script_t ==
> # This avc has a dontaudit rule in the current policy
>
> allow httpd_sys_script_t httpd_t:udp_socket { read write };
On 01/12/2012 03:18 AM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> Is this really supposed to get easier over time? :) Now my audit.log
> file shows that SELinux is blocking my cgi script, index.cgi (which is
> what's actually served when the user visits the front page of one of our
> proxy sites like sugarsurfer.
On 01/11/2012 07:19 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> Well there is already a beginner-friendly introduction:
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux
> The problem I had with it is that there are several statements that are
> unclear, missing, or just wrong. That's not necessarily the fault of the
> a
On 01/11/2012 11:07 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> That is not the way it works. SELinux Reference policy is a database
>> of rules that govern the default ways application run.
>
> Yes, but it is application developers that know what thei
On 01/11/2012 05:04 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh
> wrote:
>>
>> Now if only more people used RHEL we could further enhance
>> the products. :^)
>>
>
> Why isn'
On 12/31/2011 01:56 AM, Craig White wrote:
>
> On Dec 30, 2011, at 9:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Craig White wrote:
>>> looked like English to me...
>>>
>>> On Dec 30, 2011, at 9:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
Hey, supergiantpotato (and btw, this list is plain text, not unicode,
>>
On 12/31/2011 01:19 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> On Friday 30 December 2011 19:40:55 夜神 岩男 wrote:
> [snip]
>> We can start a 10,000 computer botnet (or, more realistically, a 10m
>> computer botnet these days, and this is a technique used right now)
>> working on the
On 12/31/2011 01:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Hey, supergiantpotato (and btw, this list is plain text, not unicode, and
> most of us don't read Japanese...),
Thanks for the info
> This is really complicated and fiddly. Look at the one awk script that was
> posted, which is *far* simpler, and
On 12/30/2011 09:00 PM, ankush grover wrote:
> Hi Friends,
>
> I am trying to write a shell script which can merge the 2 columns into
> 3rd one on Centos 5. The file is very long around 31200 rows having
> around 1370 unique groups and around 12000 unique user-names.
> The 1st column is the groupna
On 12/30/2011 02:33 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> I like to use serial numbers from MB, HDD, etc., as passwords. I never
> use normal words for my passwords, and few other users (with ssh/cli
> access) are carefully checked for their passwords.
>
> If this formula is true "(1/2 . 2 ^ 54 . 1s / 1
On 12/30/2011 01:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> On Thursday 29 December 2011 14:59:14 Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> Am 29.12.2011 14:21, schrieb Marko Vojinovic:
> so explain me why discuss to use or not to use the best
> currently availbale method in context of secur
On 12/30/2011 12:41 AM, Marc Deop wrote:
> On Thursday 29 December 2011 14:59:14 Reindl Harald wrote:
>> the hughe difference is: while having the same password (for the key)
>> it can not be used directly for brute-force und you need the password
>> and at least one time access to the key file
>
>
On 12/30/2011 12:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> 夜神　岩男 wrote:
>> On 12/29/2011 10:21 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>> On Thursday 29 December 2011 13:07:56 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.12.2011 12:56, schrieb Leonard den Ottolander:
> On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 12:29 +0100, Reindl Harald
On 12/29/2011 10:21 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Thursday 29 December 2011 13:07:56 Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 29.12.2011 12:56, schrieb Leonard den Ottolander:
>>> Hello Reindl,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 12:29 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.12.2011 09:17, schrieb Bennett Haselton:
>
On 12/29/2011 05:17 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 12/27/2011 10:42 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> 2. Why have password logins at all? Using a secure ssh key only for
>> logins makes the most sense.
>>
>
> Well that's something that I'm c
On 12/28/2011 04:40 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Rilindo Foster wrote:
>> On Dec 27, 2011, at 11:29 PM, Bennett Haselton
>>
>> What was the nature of the break-in, if I may ask?
>>
>
> I don't know how they did it, only that the hosting company had to take the
>
On 12/28/2011 02:01 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> Yeah I know that most break-ins do happen using third-party web apps;
> fortunately the servers I'm running don't have or need any of those.
>
> But then what about what my friend said:
> "For example, there was a while back ( ~march ) a kernel expl
On 12/28/2011 01:29 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Gilbert Sebenste<
> seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Bennett Haselton wrote:
>>
>>> Suppose I have a CentOS 5.7 machine running the default Apache with no
>>> extra modules enabled, a
On 12/27/2011 11:32 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
> I'm trying to learn more about Plymouth, but am having trouble finding
> sufficient documentation on it.
...
> Perhaps the error message is just confusing me.
>
> If it is just the background image, then what is not valid about the
>
I'm trying to learn more about Plymouth, but am having trouble finding
sufficient documentation on it.
After a rebuild of Plymouth with a few theme changes, I am getting an
error message on boot "Failed to read image" and then it gives me the
grub screen to boot one of the three kernels install
On 12/26/2011 09:45 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> 夜神 岩男 wrote:
>
>
>> The hard part is developing an initial understanding of how certificates
>> are interpreted and managed -- and where insecurity in the system can
>> arise. Key and certificate management is, in fact, the
On 12/24/2011 08:54 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> 夜神 岩男 wrote:
>
>>> I'm trying to setup sendmail/dovecot on a new server running CentOS-6
>>> (well, CentOS-6.2 now).
>>> Everything seems to go well, but when I run fetchmail I get this warning:
>>>
On 12/24/2011 11:34 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I'm trying to setup sendmail/dovecot on a new server running CentOS-6
> (well, CentOS-6.2 now).
> Everything seems to go well, but when I run fetchmail I get this warning:
>
> [tim@grover ~]$ fetchmail imap.maths.t
On 12/08/2011 12:14 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/07/2011 09:09 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Lucian wrote:
>>> On 7 December 2011 14:03, Reynolds McClatchey wrote:
>>>
Any workaround or do I just need to use adobe on WinXP?
>>>
>>> Nobody should need to use windows.
>>>
>>> http://lmgtfy
On 08/04/2011 03:20 AM, Todd wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> what are you doing with this email when you recieve it, beyond just
> saving it?
>
>
> I plan to analysis the mail to group into e-mails on the same topic and
> create a comprehensive answer to the topics. Along the lines of a FAQ
> for top
On 08/03/2011 06:41 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> But back to the original problem, why would anyone use ftp in this
> century when rsync or http(s) are so much easier to manage?
Do we have Kerberized rsync yet? Or Globus rsync?
If so... please post a link and... (^.^)
Anyway, that sort of gets to
On 07/28/2011 01:18 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 07/27/2011 05:34 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
>> PS: If anyone knows anything better than the above sort of commands,
>> please pipe up. I've been doing a *lot* of gconftool-2 scripted
>> customizations lately and some of the
On 07/28/2011 12:47 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
>>
>> Anyway, I'm just being silly above. The gconf key for this is:
>>
>> /apps/gnome-session/options/show_root_warning
>>
> Thats awesome... I new the rest about setting values - I just didnt know
> the name.
> Thanks,
I've become a wizard at finding tho
On 07/27/2011 11:39 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I do this for a reason as a post install step, then the system reboots
> and it never happens again...
And so you will never be asked again, it seems.
> I am trying to find how to set this checkbox which says "never ask me
> again" and move on...
But
On 07/26/2011 02:07 PM, Mike Burger wrote:
>> But you are missing the point -- WHY spend the engineering
>> effort on trying to support such Major 'upgradeany's? A new
>> deployment takes mere minutes for a commercial shop, and by
>> NOT supporting such explicitly, the upstream avoids much
>> sup
On 07/26/2011 01:32 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Mike Burger wrote:
>
>> If IBM can make this happen for their OS, and Red Hat certainly supports
>> such a process in the Fedora line of releases (including the ability to
>> list additional repositories for remote installation as pa
On 07/21/2011 09:26 PM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
>
> And more over, there is nothing earth-shatteringly new in the 3.0 kernel.
> Linus said during the last kernel summit he wanted to change the versioning
> scheme to make it easier for various developers in different realms to track
> version changes.
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 10:54 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 7/18/2011 10:27 AM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
> >
> >> (6) Having to visit a web site and then log-on if one wants to respond.
> >
> > I keychain the logins (I think most browsers have a function like this
> >
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:17 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Monday, July 18, 2011 09:19 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
>
> SPAM-L is that way ==> oh wait, it's dead...
>
> Maybe we can keep discussions about blackhat, incompetent networks,
> about SMTP, open proxies/relays, honeypots and what hav
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 15:00 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> In the example I mentioned, it was a specially created single purpose
> email SMTP address (no POP etc.) used just once about 5? months ago. It
> is easy for me to block it as the mail server (MTA Mail Transfer Agent)
> which I have done.
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 04:04 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 22:37 -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 09:07:38PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > > There is no requirement for the greeting name to match any IP, and isn't
> > > likely
>
> > RFC2821 says
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 10:46 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> >
> > An idle question:
> >
> > What is the advantage of switching to CentOS 6 if you already are
> > running SL6? Or at least... what is the purpose? I'm not really clear on
> > the difference (other than CentOS is the noisier bit of the pa
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 16:00 -0700, Emmett Culley wrote:
> On 07/11/2011 03:26 PM, b.j. mcclure wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 14:35 -0700, Emmett Culley wrote:
> >> The network configuration GUI is not to be found on any of the CentOS
> >> repos or on EPEL. I am not interested in having Network
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 14:17 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> >
> > Downloaded centos-release-6-0.el6.centos.5.x86_64.rpm and
> > redhat-logos-60.0.14-10.el6.noarch.rpm from CentOS repo
> >
> > rpm -e --nodeps sl-release redhat-logos
> > rpm -hiv redhat-logos-60.0.14-10.el6.noarch.rpm
> > centos-releas
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 16:21 -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 10:14:28PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> >
> > Its time for the world to drift away from the M$ Windoze expensive
> > nightmare. Centos is a very good alternative.
>
> While that might be true, the reality of t
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 03:03 +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 7/1/11, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > It seems to me that it should be possible
> > to have a simple, torch-battery operated, system
> > which will keep the machine alive long enough
> > to make a graceful exit.
> > A full-blown UPS wou
43 matches
Mail list logo
