On February 15, 2011 09:12:07 am Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am trying to install on a DL320 proliant.
> The disk is not being recognized. It fails when setting up disk with "no
> devices" found.
> I dont get an sda or cciss either one.
>
> I tried to disable the on board smart array controller? That di
On February 2, 2011 10:02:03 am Larry Vaden wrote:
> Is there that much distrust of the current output of leading authors
> that we need to "wait a long while"?
You don't need to wait at all. Build your own packages or install from source.
___
CentOS mai
On January 11, 2011 03:16:23 pm aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> mkpart 0 3T it works and the partition is 3TB.
>
> This is a hardware based Areca RAID. I didn't feel the need to load
> any Areca drivers as Centos supports this out the box.
>
> Any ideas?
>
Maybe it can only make 16TB partitions?
On January 9, 2011 04:26:50 pm Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Can you pass along a copy of your configuration, especially
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ and relevant /etc/ settings for a
> working KVM domain and network? I'd like to compare.
Sent offline.
___
On January 7, 2011 06:37:15 pm Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > I haven't tried that, but wouldn't you bridge the bond device instead of
> > bonding bridged nics?
>
> That would make sense, but it didn't work at all. I assume this is
> because the features are simply not simultaneously supportable.
>
On January 5, 2011 08:53:16 am Abilio Carvalho wrote:
> I have Centos 5.2 and am trying to set up my first tape loader, a
> Quantum SuperLoader 3. My "cat /proc/scsi/scsi" outputs the following:
>
> Attached devices:
> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
>Vendor: transtec Model: PV610F16R1C
On January 4, 2011 07:36:27 am Lamar Owen wrote:
> In my case, our primary e-mail server is Scalix, so that dictated the
> storage format. But, honestly, I personally would love to use a
> PostgreSQL backend so that real concurrent access is possible;
dbmail with PostgreSQL works really well. I m
On December 22, 2010 02:05:26 am Tony Mountifield wrote:
> The thing you CAN'T do is to have name-based virtual hosting with multiple
> domains on a single IP address, with more than one of them using SSL.
> Name-based virtual hosting relies on the HTTP Host: header to identify
> which virtual host
On December 13, 2010 08:14:24 am Sven Aluoor wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I have more than 12 years experience with UNIX system administration,
> but I am too stupid for programming. My only programming experience is
> shell scripting. I tried to learn Java, but don't understand it
> because it is too co
On December 8, 2010 11:23:55 am Steve Campbell wrote:
> I hadn't noticed until just now that the default apache config file
> doesn't show a virtual host for https anymore. Does that have any
> significance, and do the same old config parameters apply to the new
> httpd when I want to set up a secu
On December 1, 2010, "Scot P. Floess" wrote:
> I think when CentOS 6 is released, that may not be even close to true :)
> I'm running RHEL 6 @ work as my desktop - it has a fairly decent version
> of KDE (4.3 specifically) - and this is on a laptop -> its great ;)
>
Until a year from now. When
On November 26, 2010 11:25:06 am Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> KVM, itself, was unusable in my testing due to the "bridged network"
> mishandling and its complete lack of a concept of failover for network
> issues, particularly pair bonding for the server itself. PXE for the
> clients was unusable, an
On November 16, 2010 11:49:42 am Rob Kampen wrote:
> Hi list,
> I have noted over the last week or so my DNS servers are dumping lots of
> messages for bogus domain lookups. Examining the postfix queue with
> postqueue -p: I see many
> (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
> name=
On November 16, 2010 08:31:05 am Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 10:41 AM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
> > Thanks John, I appreciate it! Both are being replaced after a nearby 55
> > KV power line shorted to ground and blew a manhole cover 50' into the
> > air, damaging a lot of equipment over he
On September 17, 2010 01:14:42 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
> Is there any distribution (or even a VM image) that comes with LDAP
> working out of the box for local and samba authentication and ready to
> replicate to others? I think ClearOS has it for a single install but
> the last I looked the repli
On September 16, 2010 11:02:25 am Les Mikesell wrote:
> > Amanda's dumps are standard tar archives and can be restored without
> > Amanda.
>
> Well, sort-of. You have to know how to skip over the amanda label and
> header. And how to find the right set of tapes.
Sure, but at least it's document
On September 16, 2010 10:49:04 am Les Mikesell wrote:
> Agreed there. Backuppc doesn't know much about tapes and nothing about
> changers. But for straight long-term archiving you could wrap a script
> around BackupPC_tarCreate to save whatever you wanted off to tape. And
> you are on your own f
On September 16, 2010 10:23:15 am Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> But I'm convinced now that XEON's would be better even though they're
> far more expensive. And at the same time our older Pentium IV,
> Core2Duo & Core2Quad machines work as well as our XEON machines, but
> at much cheaper prices - which trans
On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, "linux-crazy" wrote:
>
> Is there is any configuration to be tuned on dhcpd.conf or any files or
> parameter to be tuned on windows 2003 guests to get the hostname from the
> DHCP/DNS . i heard about some option like "*dhcpd opt 12*" on windows
> regisrty level will
On Friday, August 20, 2010, Agnello George wrote:
> Have a question , Suppose i had a client tell me that he can access the
> web page but it takes long time to view the pages the website is a
> static website ( suppose this website does not server dynamic data or
> does not connect to a data
On Tuesday, August 17, 2010, Craig White wrote:
> Is there some easy way to rewrite just the base URL to another URL but
> leave all other URL's unmolested?
>
> i.e.
>
> http://www.example.com = rewrite to another URL
>
> http://www.example.com/files = deliver from the assigned subdirectory
>
On Monday, August 16, 2010, Rajagopal Swaminathan
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Alan Hodgson wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 15, 2010, "Robert P. J. Day"
> > wrote:
> >
> > Default ACLs make file sharing permissions work _al
On Sunday, August 15, 2010, "Robert P. J. Day"
wrote:
> i'm just curious -- how many people here are using ACLs as a regular
> and significant part of their sys admin?
>
> rday
Samba shares (a lot). subversion repositories. Some web directories.
Default ACLs make file sharing permissions wor
On Monday, August 09, 2010, Dan Burkland wrote:
> Machine is running 5.3 and somehow both packages got updated to
> libgcc-4.1.2-48.el5 when they need to be libgcc-4.1.2-44.el5. The DBAs
> here perform the Oracle Grid Control client install however they said it
> will not install it if detects an
On Monday, August 09, 2010, Dan Burkland wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have been tasked with "fixing" one of our CentOS boxes by somehow
> downgrading the libgcc and gcc packages to a specific version (Required
> by the Oracle Grid Control client). Normally I'd just remove and
> reinstall the package
On Monday, June 14, 2010, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> I have 3 nics in a NATed gateway file server. Two nics (eth1, eth2)
> Is it possible to disable the NATing, nfs, dhcp and just somehow
> bridge the external WAN nic to the internal ones such that it's just a
> pass through? Basically having the
On Tuesday 13 April 2010, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Those drives are likely fading out of the array because they aren't meant
> to be in arrays in the first place, Adaptec has told us that if you use
> consumer drives with their cards you are operating at your own risk.
>
Every hard drive dies. It's j
On Friday 19 February 2010, chloe K wrote:
> Thank you for your helping
>
> but why user keeps downloading mails what he downloaded before?
>
> I check the mail client setting and it works fine
>
> If it is not server control, any hints about this problem
It's possible that the client is having
On Thursday 18 February 2010, "Slack-Moehrle"
wrote:
> Also, what would have caused this all of the sudden? This box has been
> running fine for months.
Every hard drive will fail eventually. Some take days. Some take decades.
Most fail somewhere in between those extremes. But every single one
On Thursday 10 December 2009, Matt wrote:
> I have CentOS 4.x installed on a single 500GB SATA drive. Drive is
> about 10 percent used. I would like to migrate to software RAID 5
> without reinstalling the OS. Was thinking 3 500GB drives. Is that
> possible or must I reinstall?
>
In theory yo
On Wednesday 09 December 2009, Alan McKay wrote:
> Complete!
> [r...@localhost ~]# rpm --install
> /home/amckay/kerio-kms-6.7.3-7892.linux.i386.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libstdc++.so.5 is needed by kerio-kms-6.7.3-7892.linux.i386
> libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2) is needed by keri
On Thursday 05 November 2009, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> According to google search, errorcode 28 means the HDD is full. But it
> isn't:
>
>
> r...@vps:[~]$ df -h
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda1 84G 18G 62G 23% /
> none 640M 0
On Sunday 20 September 2009, "CSB" wrote:
> We wish to do the following:
> 1. receive an email with an attachment
> 2. process the email body to get some information from it
> 3. send an outbound email to an email address based on the information
> derived from step 2. The email will include the a
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Luis campo wrote:
> Another supplementary question, because CentOS 4.7 only recognizes 273GB
> if the disk is 300GB?
CentOS recognizes the full size of the disk. Your disconnect is between what
the manufacturer sells as 300GB, and the actual size of the disk.
--
On Wednesday 12 August 2009, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > My successor at my previous job has gleefully followed those
> > instructions (he seriously needs a clueby4 which is why he bothers to
> > actually read HowTos) and on a production box (who wants pop-corn and
> > soda? Sorry, the er support co
On Monday 06 July 2009, "fabian" wrote:
> now everything works fine without this file in the /etc/cron.daily
> directory so the tmpwatch was the culprit cause the CPU wait state to
> almost 99 % for almost 6 hrs
> but jus would like to know if this particular script has any signifance
> or any per
36 matches
Mail list logo
