Brandenburger
filbran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 18:28, Art Age Software artag...@gmail.com wrote:
IPTABLES -A INPUT -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d
192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
s1 kernel: DROP -- Catch All: IN=bond0 OUT= SRC
Hi,
I'm experiencing the most perplexing problem with iptables on CentOS
5.2. I'm hoping someone can point out what I must be missing here.
I have memcached set up on several nodes on an internal network. I
have the following rules set up to allow traffic between memcached
nodes:
IPTABLES -A
, Filipe Brandenburger
filbran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 15:45, Art Age Software artag...@gmail.com wrote:
IPTABLES -A XXX -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d
192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -j ACCEPT
Dec 12 20:33:53 s1 kernel: DROP -- Catch All: IN= OUT=bond0
SRC
=0x00 TTL=64 ID=49105 DF
PROTO=TCP SPT=49535 DPT=11211 WINDOW=501 RES=0x00 ACK PSH URGP=0
Any ideas?
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Art Age Software artag...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I originally had stateful rules in place and
packets were being dropped. I had just switched
Thanks - appreciate the info. Still, I would like to understand why
these denials are occurring during what should be a pretty typical use
case: namely sending emails from a web app. Does anyone have any
insight into this?
If these denials do not interfere with the normal workflow
of the
Hi All,
I'm running CentOS 5.2 with SELinux in enforcing mode (default
targeted policy). The server hosts a PHP web app that sends mail. I'm
getting the following errors (see end of message) in my selinux
audit.log file every time the app sends an email. The email always
seems to get sent
Very interesting.
Looking under the hood, it's actually handled by the
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-eth script, which writes the
values to the pseudo-files under /sys/class/net/bondX/bonding/, so
there you go, another way to change that dinamically without having to
restart the interface.
surprised that it has persisted so long
without being addressed.
Should I file a bug with Red Hat? It is possible for CentOS to fix
kernel problems? Or must they always be fixed upstream?
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Art Age Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the second bonding interface
without being addressed.
Should I file a bug with Red Hat? It is possible for CentOS to fix
kernel problems? Or must they always be fixed upstream?
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Art Age Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the second bonding interface have no primary interface, then? What
:45 AM, Art Age Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
could you describe in more detail?
What exactly is ignored? The options do not look much different.
As I said, I am trying to set a different primary interface for each
bond: eth0 for bond0, and eth2 for bond1.
Did you try without renaming
value), and I think you will see that it is ignored.
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Art Age Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've using linux bonding in active-backup mode to combine two pairs of
GigE NICs (eth0/eth1, eth2/eth3) into two logical bonds (bond0/bond1).
All is working fine
Hi,
I've using linux bonding in active-backup mode to combine two pairs of
GigE NICs (eth0/eth1, eth2/eth3) into two logical bonds (bond0/bond1).
All is working fine. However, I would like to specify a primary
interface for each bond. This means I need to specify different
options to the bonding
Hi all,
I would like to set up a local CentOS mirror, as suggested by others
on this list, to cut down on bandwidth usage, etc. I have read a
couple HowTos and it seems pretty straight-forward, but I do have some
questions.
1) How should I change my entries in /etc/yum.repos.d? Specifically,
Hi,
I'm wondering what the correct channel is for communicating with the
maintainer of a particular package in the Extras repo. Specifically, I
would like to find out who maintains the DRBD 8.0.x package, as there
is a newer version (8.0.12) that I would like to see added. Or,
alternatively, what
14 matches
Mail list logo
