swear to god: I did not do anything else with the xfs_*-commands
than the stuff mentioned above
Bernhard
---BeginMessage---
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:59:02 -0400
RW == Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
RW On Apr 9, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Bernhard Gschaider
RW bgschaid_li...@ice-
sf.at
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:58:39 +0100
JP == James Pearson jame...@moving-picture.com wrote:
JP Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Before I'd try to defragment my whole filesystem (see attached
mail for whole story) I figured Let's try it on some file.
JP Might be better to ask
)
Footnotes:
[1] PEBCAB: Problem exists between chair and keyboard
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:54:53 +0200
BG == Bernhard Gschaider bgschaid_li...@ice-sf.at wrote:
BG Before I'd try to defragment my whole filesystem (see attached
BG mail for whole story) I figured Let's try it on some file
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:59:02 -0400
RW == Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
RW On Apr 9, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Bernhard Gschaider
RW bgschaid_li...@ice-
sf.at wrote:
Hi!
During the last weeks I experienced some performance problems
with a large file-system
Hi!
During the last weeks I experienced some performance problems with a
large file-system on XFS basis. Sometimes for instance ls is
painfully. Immidiatly afterwards ls on the same directory is
immidiate. I used strace on this ls and found that during the first ls
the lstat-calls need approx
Hi!
I want to test some software on my CentOS 5 machine that is not too
happy with the system python (2.4). So when I install a python to my
machines I want it to be
a) clean: in other words it should be a RPM
b) safe: it should not remove the system-python (in order not to break
the
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:24:24 -0500
JP == Jim Perrin jper...@gmail.com wrote:
JP On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Bernhard Gschaider
JP bgschaid_li...@ice-sf.at wrote:
a) clean: in other words it should be a RPM b) safe: it should
not remove the system-python (in order
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:36:06 -0700
AY == Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
AY On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Bernhard Gschaider
AY bgschaid_li...@ice-sf.at wrote:
I've got a fileserver currently running under 5.3 with the
/home-partition being an XFS-filesystem. I use
Hi!
I've got a fileserver currently running under 5.3 with the
/home-partition being an XFS-filesystem. I use the kmod-xfs from
extras. It works great ;)
Now: as I understand it from the release-notes the 5.4 kernel has XFS
already built-in. Right? Or is it just a kmod-package (technology
Hi!
Some weeks ago the Running Xen-book was recommended to me on this
list. A nice book, but it gave me crazy idea: One of the
recommendations (which sounds very reasonable to me) was to have
instead of a single file that serves as a disk-image to have to
files: one of them (which is mounted to
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:47:07 +0200
BG == Bernhard Gschaider bgschaid_li...@ice-sf.at wrote:
BG Thanks to everyone who took the time to answer in this thread.
BG I'm just writing this message to give this thread some closure
BG and am not expecting any answers
I found the cause
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:43:57 +0300
PK == Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote:
PK On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 06:04:06PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider
PK wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:47:07 +0200
BG == Bernhard Gschaider bgschaid_li...@ice-sf.at wrote:
BG Thanks to everyone
Thanks for the replies so far.
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:06:08 +0100
MMG == Marcelo M Garcia marcelo.maia.gar...@googlemail.com wrote:
MMG Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Hi!
I have the following problem: I have a server (CentOS 5.3
x86_64) on which I want to install a virtual
Thanks to everyone who took the time to answer in this thread.
I'm just writing this message to give this thread some closure and am
not expecting any answers
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
IM == Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
This (and other replies) lead me to two
Hi!
I have the following problem: I have a server (CentOS 5.3 x86_64) on
which I want to install a virtual Xen-machine (CentOS 5.3 x86_64), I
ssh from my workstation (Centos 5.3 x86_64 do you see the pattern ;) )
to that server and start the virt-manager. I create a new Guest
Hi!
I'm justing in the process of setting up a new fileserver for our
company. I'm installing CentOS 5.3 (64 bit) on it.
One of the problems with it is that it has a 3.5TB filesystem for
the user data which I formatted during setup as an ext3. Now my
experience with our current fileserver is
Thank you all for your quick answers (you guys must have started
typing BEFORE I hit the Send-button).
The general consensus seems to be If you can start anew: use
XFS. This leaves one question: as the XFS is not included in the
standard-kernel which option offers the smoothest sailing
Hi!
I've got a CentOS4.7-machine as a fileserver. The machine also serves
as the LDAP-server against which all regular users are
authenticated. The problem I am having is that the machine takes a
very long time to boot. Most of the services start up rather quick,
but three services take quite a
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:54:44 -0700
JRP == John R Pierce John wrote:
JRP Mag Gam wrote:
At my university we have 50 computers in the lab. We would like
to use a scheduler to schedule our fluid models, and I was
wondering what is a good suggestion?
JRP you might
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:40:38 -0700
M == MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
M On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Bernhard Gschaider
M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John!
As I understand it the nvidia-x11-drv IS the nvidia.com-driver
just repackaged in such a way
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:53:16 +0200
BG == Bernhard Gschaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:39:22 -0400
WLM == William L Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WLM On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 20:27 +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
snip
Is there a way to say: Hey RPM, have
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:51:35 -0400
WLM == William L Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WLM WARNING! Due to my background, I don't often read man pages
WLM like I used to. So there may be some inaccuracies or
WLM ambiguities below.
WLM On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 11:58 +0200, Bernhard
@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with
J nvidia-drv-x11 when upgrading to CentOS 5.2
J On Tue, June 24, 2008 3:08 pm, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Hi!
I know that the nvidia-drv-x11-package is from RPMForge, but I
thought I might mention it here.
J problem
with
J nvidia-drv-x11 when upgrading to CentOS 5.2
J On Tue, June 24, 2008 3:08 pm, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Hi!
I know that the nvidia-drv-x11-package is from RPMForge, but I
thought I might mention it here.
problem snipped
J
Thanks for the answers
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:51:37 -0400
MS == Meenoo Shivdasani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MS On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Johnny Hughes
MS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a BUG with nss_ldap:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448014
I noticed, that the directory
/usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/plugins/
is NOT created on CentOS 5.2. Therefor for instance the flash-plugin
is not installed for the new firefox
(After manually creating the directory and setting the right symlink
it works all right)
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:03:26 +0100
KS == Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KS Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
I noticed, that the directory /usr/lib/firefox-3.0b5/plugins/
is NOT created on CentOS 5.2. Therefor for instance the
flash-plugin is not installed for the new
Judging from the frequency of my messages here one could think that
I'm too stupid to upgrade a workstation to 5.2 (but the servers I've
tried work without problem)
OK. The problem: I've tried to upgrade a 5.1-x86_64-workstation to 5.2.
During the upgrade immidiatly after (according to the
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:49:22 +0100
KS == Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KS Bernhard Gschaider wrote: Also, sitewide plugins are better in
KS /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ which comes from the xulrunner rpm.
You're right. I wasn't aware of this directory. The funny thing
OK. I managed to beat the machine into submission. But a slight
incertainty remains.
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:34:26 +0200
BG == Bernhard Gschaider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BG Judging from the frequency of my messages here one could think
BG that I'm too stupid to upgrade a workstation
Hi!
When trying to prepare a workstation with (so that the real yum
upgrade doesn't have to download the packages)
yum upgrade --upgradeonly
it fails with these messages:
Error: Missing Dependency: libegroupwise-1.2.so.12 is needed by package
evolution
Error: Missing Dependency:
Hi!
I know that the nvidia-drv-x11-package is from RPMForge, but I thought
I might mention it here.
I have a machine with a NVidia-card and because of the ease of use I
use the rpmforge-package for that.
After upgrading the problem was that during rebooting as soon as the
machine hit the RHGB
Hi!
I'm using CentOS 5.1 (x86_64) machines which authenticate using
LDAP. At the start of booting I get messages like this:
udevd[1158]: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server
ldaps://ldap.server.example.com/: Can't contact LDAP server
udevd[1158]: nss_ldap: reconnecting to LDAP server...
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:17:56 -0400 (EDT)
MAJ == Marko A Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MAJ On Tue, June 24, 2008 3:08 pm, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Hi!
I know that the nvidia-drv-x11-package is from RPMForge, but I
thought I might mention it here.
I have
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:25:11 -0500
JH == Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JH Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Hi! When trying to prepare a workstation with (so that the
real yum upgrade doesn't have to download the packages) yum
upgrade --upgradeonly it fails
On Tue, 27 May 2008 21:51:07 -0400
WLM == William L Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WLM On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 17:19 -0700, MHR wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Robert Spangler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I use one out of the Fedora's repos? If so, which repo?
36 matches
Mail list logo
