Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 19:35, Stephen Harris wrote:
>> Which shows it's working... but painfully slowly. Bandwidth and especially
>> latency is killing you.
>>
>
> Other than getting a new ISP, is there anything that I can do about the
> latency?
I can smoothly run X over
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Thanks Les for your reply. (I dont top-post normally, but this was an
> emergency)
Emergency? Sorry, but your posts are leading me to think that you have
lost it.
>> Have you looked at Ubuntu's setup? I don't think it deals with GPU's but it
>> m
> Idea being that the dumb switches are used solely for local data
> transfer between up to X number of App servers and storage nodes. The
> managed switch then handles only external communications as well as
> any firewalling.
Oh you have dumb switches in the mix? Not going to work as Gordon has
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion, I'll read up more about them. The
> bond0 and just works sounds simple which is a Good Thing! The problem
> was the last time I tried to cross connect multiple switches,
> everything just died so there must be something a bit more involved?
>
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>> Christopher Chan wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 08, 2010 05:09 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
>>>> On 07/08/2010 05:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>>>>>> Hmmm ... which bond mode are you using?
&g
JohnS wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 07:51 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I think some bridge or vlan scenarios require promiscuous mode (and the
>> corresponding disabling of hardware acceleration). Maybe the real issue is
>> that
>> something accidentally disabled it and you now only work wh
Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> HiChristopher,
>
> On 08/07/10 10:25, Christopher Chan wrote:
Why mode 4 of course.
>> Huh? Like why? It's the recommended mode unless the switch does not
>> suppoprt it or the boards don't.
> I never realised this is the recommended mode. Do you have pointers
> where
Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Thursday, July 08, 2010 05:09 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
>> On 07/08/2010 05:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Hmmm ... which bond mode are you using?
>>> Why mode 4 of course.
>> Ouch. Never used that mode.
>
> Huh? Like why? It's the recommended mode unless the swi
>> Are you running a proxy for http? It would be rather
>> surprising that internal machines can access the Internet
>> without forwarding turned on otherwise. When you say internal
>> machines cannot access your server, are they connecting to it
>> via the local interface's ip or the Internet
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>> Christopher Chan wrote:
>>> And now the thing is working again...
>> It's not working again.
>>
>> Running tcpdump -i vlan seems to trigger something to get the network
>> working again b
Christopher Chan wrote:
> And now the thing is working again...
It's not working again.
Running tcpdump -i vlan seems to trigger something to get the network
working again but as soon as I stop tcpdump...nada, zip, zilch.
Any ideas? I see no errors in the logs whether of the switch or the box,
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 6/29/10, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
> wrote:
>> gluster don't care about underlying filesystem...it don't support acl
>> yet for a reason
>
> Could you elaborate on that? Although at the moment I don't appear to
> have a
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 6/29/10, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> raid1/iscsi if you have a single host accessing the data or gluster if
>> you have more than one host accessing the data...
>
> This is starting to look really complicated with NCP Storage units on
> zfs -> iscsi to gluster unit e
CList wrote:
>>> I have been trying to install CentOS 5.4 on a Intel SR1530SHS, Intel
> S3200SH
>>> mainboard.. It has a 3 x 1TB sata hotswap drives with LSI software raid
>>> onboard.
>> fake-raid alert!
>>
>>> I had configured the LSI to have Sata0 and Sata1 with raid 1 and the
> third
>>> drive
CList wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been trying to install CentOS 5.4 on a Intel SR1530SHS, Intel S3200SH
> mainboard.. It has a 3 x 1TB sata hotswap drives with LSI software raid
> onboard.
fake-raid alert!
>
> I had configured the LSI to have Sata0 and Sata1 with raid 1 and the third
> drive as a
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/5/2010 12:00 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>> Try to run the same IO operations as your production server is running.
>>> Bonnie++ could be good application for benchmarking. Also run some
>>> parallel rsync, rm, find, etc proccesses.
>>>
>> I am with John Pierce on this one
Georghy wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher a écrit :
>> xe dd (assuming you have a floppy [is usb supported?] disk with the drivers)
>>
> A floppy isn't enough because the driver is about 2.7Mb so I use a USB
> Stick. It should be the same with a Floppy.
>>&g
Georghy wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher a écrit :
>> Georghy wrote:
>>
>>> Tru Huynh a écrit :
>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:03:00PM +0200, Georghy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> (1)Downloa
Georghy wrote:
> Tru Huynh a écrit :
>> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:03:00PM +0200, Georghy wrote:
>>
>>> (1)Download that driver :
>>> http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=Y&ProdId=3117&DwnldID=18570&lang=fra
>>> from the intel support web site
>>>
>>>
>> You should have sta
Jure Pečar wrote:
>>> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> I think what you want is a proper storage array with mirrored write
> cache.
>
> When ext3 came into widespread use, a popular method to "cache" frequent
> fsyncs was to run it in a full data journaling mode, with external journal on
> a sepa
Brian Sr wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 14:29 +0100, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
>>> Here's a question: are you using your old configuration files? You might
>>> want to compare the default from the install with the old ones - there may
>>> be deprecated or defunct or invalid options.
>>
Benjamin Franz wrote:
> Robert Heller wrote:
>> I suspect that this is a simular case to what I did: I have a server
>> with 4 drives. I have several (small) RAID1 partitions (/boot, /,
>> /usr, /var, etc.) with 4 mirrors and one large RAID5 with three
>> partitions and a hot spare (a LVM volumn g
Benjamin Franz wrote:
> Ross Walker wrote:
>> No, not yet, but I always recommend setting up your data arrays
>> manually so your intimately familiar with how they are constructed and
>> the mdadm command usage is fresh in your head.
>>
>> Did you know with Neil's raid10 implementation you can
JohnS wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 23:19 -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>>> Mysql by itself has built in "clustering" though
>>> there can be significant limitations in it depending on your
>>> requirements.
>> I agree. The built in cluster has too many limitations to
>> be useful, but MySQL master
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Can anyone, who has used both Postfix & Exim please share some experience
> with me? Which of these 2 did you prefer to use, and why?
I have not used exim but I know someone who swears by it. It is highly
configurable and had stuff like sender based routing before postfix did
Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Christopher Chan
> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, March 09, 2010 12:34 AM, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> Can somebody recommend CentOS-OK, dual socket motherboards for compute
>>> elements? A quick look up at Intel pages suggests they
Mihai T. Lazarescu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34:34AM -0400, Susan Day wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis wrote:
>>
Why?
>>> That is a good question - I "guess" that google's email system thinks
>>> you're
>>> sending them spam. If you want your mail to be acc
Brian Mathis wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Dominik Zyla wrote:
>
>> And please, stop send mails with html encoding.
>>
>> --
>> Dominik Zyla
>>
>
> No, do not stop sending emails with HTML encoding.
>
> Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have flying
> car
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:01:28 +0800:
>
>> Programmers always have a hard time picking up on the
>> system admin side of things.
>
> Still they should be able to find the best avenue for their questions, or
> not
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Susan Day wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:25:38 -0400:
>
>> Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list
>> __last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either.
>
> Maybe that's because of the nature of your questions. I get the impression
> that you
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>>> postfix has a very active mailing list -- the originator and primary
>>> developer, Wietse Venema,responds to posts quite often, as well as
>>> many other postfix experts.
>>>
>>> http://www.postfix.org/lis
>> postfix has a very active mailing list -- the originator and primary
>> developer, Wietse Venema,responds to posts quite often, as well as
>> many other postfix experts.
>>
>> http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
>
>
> Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list
> __last_w
B.J. McClure wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 08:57 -0400, Susan Day wrote:
>
>
>
>> With respect to Kai's suggestion I find a qmail list, I'm sorry to say
>> there don't appear to be ANY discussion lists for ANY email servers
>> that are active. I'm desperate to get this working.
>> TIA,
>> Suzie
Susan Day wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>> 2010/2/26 Susan Day :
>>> Hi;
>>> The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does
>>> reach their destination:
>>>
>>> [root qmail-send]# tail current
>>>
>>> @40004b87b3d3392cbddc new msg 97
>> Susan, is qmail-send running? tcpserver is used to run qmail-smtpd to
>> accept emails but qmail-send does the actual queue processing and delivery.
>>
> 27755 ?S 0:00 multilog t s10 n20 /var/log/qmail/qmail-send
Susan, why do you say the email server is broken?
'tail -f /var
Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/2/24 Susan Day :
>> Hi;
>> [r...@13gems beno]# netstat -ltnup
>> Active Internet connections (only servers)
>> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address
>> State PID/Program name
>> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:33060.0.0.0:*
>>
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Also, what would have caused this all of the sudden? This box has been
running fine for months.
>>> Well, do you think that computer hardware lives forever?
>>>
>> They don't? /me stares at 486dx with a working floppy drive and working
>> floppies from the eighties
>> Also, what would have caused this all of the sudden? This box has been
>> running fine for months.
>
> Well, do you think that computer hardware lives forever?
>
They don't? /me stares at 486dx with a working floppy drive and working
floppies from the eighties and early nineties.
_
Craig White wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 09:50 -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
>> On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
>> > > wrote:
>>
>>>> If you have hundreds or thousands of users and hundreds of groups,
>>>> well good luc
> If you have hundreds or thousands of users and hundreds of groups,
> well good luck. It is extremely hard to automate assigning these uids/
> gids and making sure they don't collide with each other or other unix
> systems and doing it by hand is a torture reserved for the ninth
> circle o
> Wbinfo -u & wbinfo -g do indeed work for me however getent passwd or getent
> group returns no AD users or groups. I have winbind entries in nsswitch for
> both the passwd & group entries. Josepeh, I will try a newer RPM from a
> different repository and see if that resolves my issues. Did my
Sergej Kandyla wrote:
> Christopher Chan wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 04, 2010 03:48 PM, Hadi Motamedi wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All
>>> I need to install Windows as guest on my CentOS 5 as host . Can you
>>> please give me the link to download the requierd rpm package for this
>>> purpose ?
>>> Tha
>> Ah, well #1 on his list then is to figure out what he is running!
>
> LOL, I know it sounds quite noobish, coming across like I've no idea
> what DBMS it is running on. The system currently runs on MySQL but
> part of my update requirement was to decouple the DBMS so that we can
> make an even
Anas Alnaffar wrote:
> I tried to run this command
>
> find -name "*.access*" -mtime +2 -exec rm {} \;
>
Should have been: find ./ -name \*.access\* -mtime +2 -exec rm -f {} \;
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/l
> On the machine where I had the problem I had to run memtest86 more than a day
> to
> finally catch it. Then after replacing the RAM and fsck'ing the volume, I
> still
> had mysterious problems about once a month until I realized that the disks
> are
> accessed alternately and the fsck pas
ded a 4-port Intel Gigabit adapter too but that is of
no consequence with storage right now.
>
> Regards
> Per Qvindesland
>
> At Tisdag, 12-01-2010 on 11:57 "Chan Chung Hang Christopher" wrote:
>
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 12/01/10 00:02, Christopher Chan wro
Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
> 2010/1/12 Chan Chung Hang Christopher :
>> Eeek! That thing will be hosting the school's vle. Looks like I better
>> memorize the after hours password for HP support.
>
> I have had lots[1] of problems lately with DIMMs becoming defective
>> Which is why I specifically said 'performance wise' as respects 3ware. I
>> don't remember anything bad about 3ware stability wise or monitoring wise.
>
> Is that supposed to be a joke? 3ware has certainly had their fair share of
> stability problems (drive time-outs, bbu-problems, inconsiste
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 12/01/10 00:02, Christopher Chan wrote:
>>> problems mostly centered around management and performance issues. the
>>> world is littered with stores of cciss fail
>> Really? Man, I have been given this spanking new HP DL370 G6 and running
>> Centos 5.4 on it...
>
> I'v
> " Maximum 3.5" hot-swap drives density 36x (24 front + 12 rear) HDD bays"
>
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/chassis/4U/847/SC847A-R1400.cfm
>
> Did anybody else think "WTF?" when you saw that picture?
>
> I have seen crazy stuff, but that one is pretty high-up on the list
>
> Doesn'
John Doe wrote:
> From: Boris Epstein
>> This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set up
>> some storage servers to run under Linux - most likely CentOS. The storage
>> volume would be in the range specified: 8-15 TB. Any recommendations as far
>> as hardware?
>
> Dep
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Yes, these figures indicate that you are fairly close to being cpu bound.
>>
>> What kind of filtering are you doing? If you have any connection
>> tracking/state related rules set, you will need to be using a fair
>> amount of cpu.
>
> Initially, when the load
Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 31.12.2009, 12:34 +0100 schrieb Chan Chung Hang
> Christopher:
>>>> Look at the first two columns. What column have higher numbers? If r,
>>>> you're CPU-bound. If b, you're I/O bound.
>>> pr
>> Look at the first two columns. What column have higher numbers? If r,
>> you're CPU-bound. If b, you're I/O bound.
>
> procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system--
> -cpu--
> r b swpd free buff cache si sobibo in cs us sy id wa
> st
>
Peter Serwe wrote:
> I'll second damn near everything nate said, and hopefully add a tidbit or
> two.
>
> If you're new to BSD, you may want to consider the pfsense project in the
> aforementioned active-active configuration.
>
> It gives you a nice, intuitive gui to manage your failover firewall
sadas sadas wrote:
> The syntax is not a problem. The problem is in the performance. I suppose
> that if I configure OpenBSD to process the in/out packets only to layer 2 the
> performance will be much more than linux with iptables.
>
You know SQUAT about filtering on Linux. You want a bridg
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>> What about NetBSD? I heard that NetBSD has the best network stack out
>>> there. Maybe NetBSD with pf is the best choice?
>> NetBSD is a very nice OS, I personally like it most (out of all BSDs out
>> there); however, as can be read on
>>
>> http://www
Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
>
>> Steve Thompson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS
>>>> box. I
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS
> box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single
> LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB cheap
> storage in a single mount point).
How about eSATA? Surely an
Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
>
>> I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS
>> box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single
>> LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB cheap
>> storage in
Alan McKay wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Christopher Chan
> wrote:
>> A cluster filesystem
>
> OK, but you've just given me a circular definition.
>
>> When you do not need/want a cluster file system
>
> and again ...
>
Okay, a cluster/distributed file system that does not have it
>> Write barriers were introduced to give data guarantees with hard drives
>> that have their write cache enabled. Unfortunately, not everything has
>> been given barrier support. LVM and JFS do not have write barrier support.
>>
>>
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-December
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
>> LVM like md raid and drbd is a layered block device and
>> If you turn the wire caches off on the HDs then there is no problem,
>> but HDs aren't designed to perform to spec with the write cache
>> disabled they expect important data is written with FUA access (forced
>> u
Timo Schoeler wrote:
> [off list]
>
>
> Thanks for your eMail, Ross. So, reading all the stuff here I'm really
> concerned about moving all our data to such a system. The reason we're
> moving is mainly, but not only the longisch fsck UFS (FreeBSD) needs
> after a crash. XFS s
Timo Schoeler wrote:
> thus Chan Chung Hang Christopher spake:
>
>> Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>
>>> thus Christopher Chan spake:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Ian Forde wrote:
>>>>
>>
Timo Schoeler wrote:
> thus Christopher Chan spake:
>
>> Ian Forde wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Florin Andrei
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
John R Pierce wrote:
> I've always avoided XFS because A) it wsan't supported natively in
> RHEL
> anyway
John R Pierce wrote:
> Timo Schoeler wrote:
>
>> For enterprise environments my favorite FS is XFS, YMMV, though.
>>
>>
>
> I've always avoided XFS because A) it wsan't supported natively in RHEL
> anyways, and B) I've heard far too many stories about catastrophic loss
> problems and d
Jure Pečar wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:48:56 -0800
> John R Pierce wrote:
>
>
>> Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>
>>> For enterprise environments my favorite FS is XFS, YMMV, though.
>>>
>>>
>> I've always avoided XFS because A) it wsan't supported natively in RHEL
>> anyways, and B)
Miguel Medalha wrote:
> I am about to install a new server running CentOS 5.4. The server will
> contain pretty critical data that we can't afford to corrupt.
>
> I would like to benefit from the extra speed and features of a ext4
> filesystem but I don't have any experience with it.
> Is there s
Alan McKay wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> We've got some new hardware and are trying to figure out what best to
> do with it. Either run CentOS right on the bare metal, or
> virtualize, or several combination options. Mainly looking at :
>
> - CentOS on bare metal
> - CentOS on ESXi 4.0 with local dis
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>> How can I RAID 10 on install?
>>
>
> Does anyone know if this approach:
> http://www.howtoforge.com/install-ubuntu-with-software-raid-10
>
> Will work for CentOS?
>
Never tried the Centos LiveCD so I cannot say but manually creating the
raid1 arrays and then stripi
ML wrote:
> People went back and forth on the list saying that if a hardware
> controller was out of the budget right now RAID 10 would be the best
> solution.
>
That is raid1+0. raid10, under md, is something else different from raid1+0.
> It seems that the installer wont let you create t
James Bensley wrote:
> 2009/10/22 Chan Chung Hang Christopher
>
>
>> Sorry, got mixed up. I thought he was talking about what he was doing
>> for his company. Just kind of wary of people who go: Calling all Hackers
>> but they actually mean Calling all Crackers
>
James Bensley wrote:
> Wait a minute, didn't someone just try and offer their help to the
> community;
> Where in their email did they mention cpanel?
>
Sorry, got mixed up. I thought he was talking about what he was doing
for his company. Just kind of wary of people who go: Calling all Hacker
Jerry Geis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a local user account call "panel" on a machine.
> When I use the mail command to manually send email to the panel account
> it over 1 minute until that mail actually deposited in the mail account.
>
> What setting is that reduces this time?
>
> I changed /etc/
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher schrieb:
>
>> I suspect so. After all, it is just seen as a disk as far as md is
>> concerned and it will do the same normal thing if you unplugged a single
>> disk from the array.
>>
>>
>
&
Jonathan Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> You can, if you connect the iscsi block devices into one machine that can
>> combine them in one or more md raid devices, put a filesystem on them, and
>> export via nfs and/or smb to the systems that want shared
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Does anyone know about some free (as in beer, and maybe as in speech)
> software
> which would implement authentication and authorization of a user prior to
> issuing a valid dhcp lease?
>
> I imagine the following scenario: someone walks into my office building with
>
Toby Bluhm wrote:
> You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
>
> We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of this
> "soon" crap will do. Please post a progress report on packages built,
> isos transfered, server update progress by region, hours worked,
> ke
Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
> testing mail delivery
>
>
deliver failure: 550 Administrative Prohibition
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> When you say go voip, do you mean use sip for the stations only or also
>> for the trunks?
>>
>
> My experience (and the experience of those I know) is that SIP trunks
> don't really work consistently. But, when I say I need to learn VOIP
> I'm mostly talking about the station side. My goa
>> You can get asterisk packages from rpmforge on Centos...but on Ubuntu
>> you do not have to add an extra repository to get asterisk.
>>
>
> Don't bother with that, go straight to the source!
> http://packages.asterisk.org/
> These get updated rather quickly.
>
Ah, now that will defini
Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Tait Clarridge wrote:
>
>
>> CentOS is great for server use and if you want to learn CentOS for use
>> as a server, Fedora is a great place to start because they are both
>> redhat based. Chances are that if you got something to work in Fed
Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Geoff Galitz a écrit :
>
>
>> Ubuntu has the LTS releases, which are long term stable releases. They are
>> supported for five years after release.
>>
>>
> Ubuntu Long Term Support is three years for desktops and five for servers.
>
> In the last LTS version (8.04), hal
Tom O'Connor wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 03:24:52PM +0100, Tom O'Connor wrote:
>>
>>
>>> If anyone has any ideas for further debugging, or other routes for
>>> support. I'm running out of ideas.
>>>
>>>
>> Enterprise Linux 5.4 with included
Luis campo wrote:
> hi,
>
> have installed centos 4.7
>
> We have installed qmail + simscan + vpopmail + SpamAssassin + clanAV
> and when we send a mail from a particular domain, the following error leaves
> us
>
>
How about changing that combination of qmail + simscan to postfix +
clamav-mi
CentOS List wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an existing iptables as follows:-
>
> # Firewall configuration written by system-config-securitylevel
> # Manual customization of this file is not recommended.
> *filter
> :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
> :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -
> However, we are NOT accepting monetary donations at this point. We will
> not accept monetary donations until there is something in place where
> more than one person has to approve any spending and some kind of
> committee is in place to manage incoming and outgoing funds.
>
>
ooh, ouch.
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Can I suggest ZFS on Solaris/OpenSolaris? Real breeze to setup.
>>
>> As for Linux, it has been a while but are there still two iscsi-target
>> implementations? Has any one of them got into the mainline (Linux - not
>> Redhat - although if Redhat will support one implemen
> chan, I already have CentOS 5.3 setup, and we need to use this as far
> as possible, due to some of the other software that we'll be using.
>
>
See Joseph Casale's post then. It is not quite available on Centos. Roll
your own is the name of the game.
___
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Chan Chung Hang Christopher schrieb:
>
>> Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Has anyone succesfully setup, and used CentOS as an iSCSI server? I'm
>>> trying to setup a server with 4x500GB HDD's, setup in RAID 1
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Has anyone succesfully setup, and used CentOS as an iSCSI server? I'm
> trying to setup a server with 4x500GB HDD's, setup in RAID 10 to act
> as an iSCSI server for a virtualization project, but I can't find a
> decent howto on how to setup an iSCSI server using CentOS.
>
> I
I would NOT do that. You should like the md layer handle all things
raid
and let lvm do just volume management.
>>> Your under the asumption that they are two different systems.
>>>
>>>
>> You're under the assumption that they are not.
>>
>
> http://en
Miguel Medalha wrote:
>>> You might be interested in this article:
>>>
>>> "Why is RAID 1+0 better than RAID 0+1?"
>>> http://aput.net/~jheiss/raid10/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> The whole raid1+0 or raid0+1 argument was really only relevant in the
>> days of pata when one disk dying on one chan
MontyRee wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
>
> I found that so many unnessary queue files are saved at
> /var/spool/clientmqueue/ directory.
>
How do you know they are unnecessary?
>
>
> I tested two way to delete these files.
>
> 1.
> # rm -rf /var/spool/clientmqueue/*
>
> 2.
> # cd /va
> Now the Designers groups should have rw rights for Projects and subfolders
>
> The draghtsmen should be able to upload only files (not folders) to
> Final subfolder. They are not allowed to modify/delete anything
> anywhere. They will not have any permission in project folder
>
> any ideas?
>
>> Also processes you thinkk you DO recognize:
>> Just for testing how alert my co-workers were, i had a program called
>> "kswapd", just calculating prime-numbers...
>> They never noticed. ;-)
>>
>> Without any preperation it's harder. No point in installing tripwire,
>> activating apparmor/selin
> I didn't know that IPCOP could run on one that old. I have one like
> that up in the attic, time to bring it back down. Before I upgraded to
> 5.3, I was running 4.7 with FireStarter and did not have any troubles.
> As soon as I get some sleep I will be looking in to setting it up.
>
>
A response I got from the local LUG here in Hong Kong to a post about
translating the wiki articles into Chinese pointed me to the links below:
http://www.centoschina.com/
http://apt.nc.hcc.edu.tw/web/student_server_centos/student_server_centos.html
Posted just in case the Centos team has an iss
>> So I started looking around in /var/log. I looked at my secure logs and
>> saw nothing out of the ordinary. I looked in samba and found a log file
>> 58.239.84.158.log. I opened it up and it said the following:
>>
>> [2009/08/15 06:31:34, 0] lib/access.c:check_access(327)
>> Denied conne
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
