[CentOS] Intel DP55WG centos 5.5 support?

2010-10-18 Thread Coert Waagmeester
Hello all, I have looked around on the HCL and on other hardware sites. Do any of you have experience with Centos 5.5 64 bit on these motherboards? Regards, Coert Waagmeester ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman

Re: [CentOS] LARTC and CentOS question

2010-09-09 Thread Coert Waagmeester
Kahlil Hodgson wrote: > On 08/09/10 19:26, Coert Waagmeester wrote: >> Could someone point me in the right direction, where I can find >> CentOS/Redhat specific documentation on the whole >> /etc/sysconfig/network* setup? > > > Might want to have a look at &

[CentOS] LARTC and CentOS question

2010-09-08 Thread Coert Waagmeester
etup? Kind regards, Coert Waagmeester ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] mail server best practices question

2010-05-11 Thread Coert
Ned Slider wrote: > Coert wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> About a year ago I set up a mail server on CentOS using this howto: >> http://wanderingbarque.com/howtos/mailserver/mailserver.html >> I managed to add amavisd-new with clamav and spamassassin. >> It ru

Re: [CentOS] mail server best practices question

2010-05-11 Thread Coert
Coert wrote: > Benjamin Franz wrote: >> On 05/10/2010 01:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> On 5/10/2010 2:51 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote: >>>> Actually, they do (break when updating, that is). >>>> >>>> The problem is at least one of the packagers fo

Re: [CentOS] mail server best practices question

2010-05-11 Thread Coert
Benjamin Franz wrote: > On 05/10/2010 01:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On 5/10/2010 2:51 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote: >>> Actually, they do (break when updating, that is). >>> >>> The problem is at least one of the packagers for clamd/amavisd-new >>> blindly overrides the path to clamd.sock by overwri

[CentOS] mail server best practices question

2010-05-10 Thread Coert
appreciated. Regards, Coert ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] VMware server 2 - Strange behaviour

2010-03-29 Thread Coert
ppreciated > Hi Georghy, I run VMware server 2 on PAE kernel. Are you running 2.0.2? I had the same problem as you when running < 2.0.2 2.0.2 has been fixed to work with CentOS 5.4 without that glibc trick on the CentOS bug tracker. I have so far not had any problems with my installation. Reg

Re: [CentOS] drbd xen question

2009-08-20 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 09:38 -0600, Alan Sparks wrote: > Ross Walker wrote: > > On Aug 20, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Coert Waagmeester > > wrote: > > > >> Hello all, > >> > >> > >> I am running drbd protocol A to a secondary machine to ha

[CentOS] drbd xen question

2009-08-20 Thread Coert Waagmeester
Hello all, I am running drbd protocol A to a secondary machine to have 'backups' of my xen domUs. Is it necessary to change the xen domains configs to use /dev/drbd* instead of the LVM volume that drbd mirrors, and which the xen domU runs of? rega

[CentOS] OT: eclipse on x86_64 compile for x86?

2009-08-14 Thread Coert Waagmeester
Hello all, Have installed eclipse 3.5 x86_64 from the eclipse site, with CDT and QT integration. I am just starting to learn C++ but I would like to know how to set up the ability to compile for 32 bit as well? At the moment I am googleing this as well. Regards, Coert

Re: [CentOS] [SOLVED sort of] DRBD very slow....

2009-07-30 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 11:42 +0400, Roman Savelyev wrote: > No way in 8.2 > It's a socket option, managed well in 8.3 and later releases. > If you don't hav large amount of very small syncronius writes, you don't > need it. > - Original Message - >

Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....

2009-07-28 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 18:18 -0400, Ross Walker wrote: > On Jul 27, 2009, at 4:09 PM, Coert Waagmeester > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:37 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:02 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrot

Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....

2009-07-27 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:37 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:02 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 08:30 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > > > > >> Hello Roman, > > >> > >

Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....

2009-07-27 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:02 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 08:30 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > > >> Hello Roman, > >> > >> I am running drbd 8.2.6 (the standard centos version) > > > Hi, > > hav

Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....

2009-07-26 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 08:30 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 10:18 +0400, Roman Savelyev wrote: > > > Invest in a HW RAID card with NVRAM cache that will negate the need > > > for barrier writes from the OS as the controller will issue them async > &

Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....

2009-07-26 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 10:18 +0400, Roman Savelyev wrote: > > Invest in a HW RAID card with NVRAM cache that will negate the need > > for barrier writes from the OS as the controller will issue them async > > from cache allowing I/O to continue flowing. This really is the safest > > method. > It's

Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....

2009-07-26 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 09:27 -0400, Ross Walker wrote: > On Jul 24, 2009, at 3:28 AM, Coert Waagmeester > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 10:21 +0400, Roman Savelyev wrote: > >> 1. You are hit by Nagel alghoritm (slow TCP response). You can > >> b

Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....

2009-07-24 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 10:21 +0400, Roman Savelyev wrote: > 1. You are hit by Nagel alghoritm (slow TCP response). You can build DRBD > 8.3. In 8.3 "TCP_NODELAY" and "QUICK_RESPONSE" implemented in place. > 2. You are hit by DRBD protocol. In most cases, "B" is enought. > 3. You are hit by triple

Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....

2009-07-23 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 18:16 -0700, Ian Forde wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 11:16 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > > The highest speed I can get through that link with drbd is 11 MB/sec > > (megabytes) > > Not good... > > > But if I copy a 1 gig file over that li

Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....

2009-07-23 Thread Coert Waagmeester
___ Any tips would be greatly appreciated. Kind regards, Coert ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....

2009-07-22 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 11:16 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > Hello all, > > we have a new setup with xen on centos5.3 > > I run drbd from lvm volumes to mirror data between the two servers. > > both servers are 1U nec rack mounts with 8GB RAM, 2x mirrored 1TB > seagat

[CentOS] DRBD very slow....

2009-07-22 Thread Coert Waagmeester
internal; on baldur.somedomain.local { address 10.99.99.1:7793; } on thor.somedomain.local { address 10.99.99.2:7793; } } Kind regards, Coert ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Centos 5 samba with AD integration and XFS with extended ACLs

2009-07-21 Thread Coert Waagmeester
XFS supports it. I want to set up a samba server that authenticated to AD. I have that up and running, only the extended ACLs still to do. Thanks in advance, Coert ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] raid 1 disks upgrade

2009-07-13 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 12:20 +0200, Tim Verhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Coert > Waagmeester wrote: > > > > I have a machine with 2 SATA 250GB disks which I want to upgrade to 1TB > > SATAs > > > > This is the partition structure on both di

[CentOS] raid 1 disks upgrade

2009-07-13 Thread Coert Waagmeester
an easier way? Regards, Coert ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Is there an openssh security problem?

2009-07-10 Thread Coert Waagmeester
EW --set -j ACCEPT /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -s 196.1.1.0/24 -d 196.1.1.31 \ --dport 22 -m state --state ESTABLISHED --state RELATED -j ACCEPT it only allows one NEW connection to ssh per minute. That is also a good protection right

[CentOS] new RAID5 array: 3x500GB with XFS

2009-07-03 Thread Coert Waagmeester
worth the trouble to also create an LVM volume on the RAID array? Regards, Coert ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS and Redhat Directory Server

2009-07-02 Thread Coert Waagmeester
o make workstations authenticate to the DS and such? Regards, Coert ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How do I change passwords / remove users for Samba?

2009-06-23 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:08 +0100, Kevin Thorpe wrote: > I've got a bit of a problem with Samba. I just can't work out how to > change passwords or remove users. > I've just got user security.. lines in smb.conf are: > > security = user > passdb backend = tdbsam > > I've remov

Re: [CentOS] NAS Storage server question

2009-06-19 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 15:28 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: > Coert Waagmeester schrieb: > > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 22:59 +0200, Giuseppe Fuggiano wrote: > > > >> 2009/6/11 Coert Waagmeester : > >> > >>> Hello all, > >>> &g

Re: [CentOS] NAS Storage server question

2009-06-18 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 22:59 +0200, Giuseppe Fuggiano wrote: > 2009/6/11 Coert Waagmeester : > > Hello all, > > Hi, > > > At our office a have a server running 3 Xen domains. Mail server, etc. > > > > I want to make this setup more redundant. > > > &

Re: [CentOS] Xen with multiple virtual network interfaces with one bond

2009-06-17 Thread Coert Waagmeester
Sorry for mailing this to the wrong list. Rectified On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 14:21 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > Hello all, > > I have been running xen for a while now with two interfaces: > dummy0 for host only communication, and > eth0 for the outside network. > > my s

[CentOS] Xen with multiple virtual network interfaces with one bond

2009-06-17 Thread Coert Waagmeester
but that also does not work. It also messes up my bond. Any tips would be greatly appreciated. Kind regards, Coert ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] NAS Storage server question

2009-06-11 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 13:35 -0700, RobertH wrote: > > > > > Briefly, but iet has been rock stable for me. It just runs forever... > > I have only used NFS under vmware, it worked good. > > > > jlc > > ___ > > jlc, > > what has been rock stable? > >

Re: [CentOS] NAS Storage server question

2009-06-11 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 17:14 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: > Coert Waagmeester schrieb: > > Hello all, > > > > > > At our office a have a server running 3 Xen domains. Mail server, etc. > > > > I want to make this setup more redundant. > > > > The

[CentOS] NAS Storage server question

2009-06-11 Thread Coert Waagmeester
the iSCSI target server in a production environment yet? Is NFS and option? Kind regards, Coert Waagmeester ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Building a custom install CD

2009-06-09 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 15:13 -0700, Fred Moyer wrote: > Greetings, > > I am looking for resources on how to build my own Centos install CD > for a preselected package set that I want to install. I think Red Hat > may have had this functionality at some point but it has been a while > since I have