At 11:01 PM 8/31/2008, you wrote:
On Aug 31, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Sadaruwan Samaraweera wrote:
also NOT top posting? - Wht do u mean by this I don't get u.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 1:54 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Sadaruwan Samaraweera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> thx every much trying to get me on to the right track and I
apologize for
> being such an ass. Sorry again yes I made a big mistake. I was
under lot of
> pressure in my private life so I think that might have come over me.
Well, now that the pressure's off, or lightened, how about editing
your posts, and also NOT top posting?
he means what you did just here, and in your other posts. :) you put
your response above the quoted message you were replying to, rather
than below it. please don't do this; it makes it difficult to follow
the conversation, and thus it decreases the likelihood that you will
get the responses you want.
also, when i just now did a google search for "top posting", the
entire first page of hits were all links that explained what he was
talking about.
-steve
While I know that the practice won't, and shouldn't change for me, I
would just like to say that for some of us, top posting is more
useful. I am a blind computer user, and top posting is easier to
handle. I can read the response, and continue reading if I need
context, more information etc.
Unix/Linux people tend to be pretty black and white, and the world
should be a certain way ... but remember, others of us may have a
good reason for wanting a different world!
Dave
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
