On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 05:41 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
> Sorry to jump in here, but combination of humorous and serious thoughts
> crossed my mind. And maybe these thoughts will allay future threads of
> this nature.
>
> On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 09:28 -0500, Doug Tucker wrote:
> (Me, too, of course!)
>
> mhr
MHR,
This is true, and you and I proved we can even have fun with it, but
name calling (I got called an ass here for virtually nothing), and
disrespectful snide remarks (such as telling someone they have provided
zero value to a conversation when it was valuable
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 02:06 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Carol Anne Ogdin wrote:
> > Jumping in late here: I sincerely wish that this list was maintained on any
> > of the quality "bulletin board" or "Forum" tools. It would reduce my eMail
> > load, allow me to zoom in on just the issues of int
> I imagine that most of the folks subscribed are System Administrators,
> Engineers and Architects. I'd also leap to the unproven assumption that
> the majority are overworked, underpaid, stressed, and stuff like that.
> If that doesn't make for a bunch of terse, grumpy, and otherwise
> fr
> OK ... you are officially an ass .. I will no longer reply to your mails
> or help you in any way.
Wow. My apologies, I thought that was actually a productive reply, not
even sure how you got offended, but I will apologize anyway, I don't
intend to ever offend anyone.
___
> All I am saying is that GFS (and any other ADDED repo besides Base or
> Updates) will get updates ... however they are not normally going to be
> as fast as the Base and Updates repos. That is just how it goes.
I can totally live with that, I was just b**ching about RH's approach.
I'm not exp
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 15:56 -0500, Scott Nelson wrote:
> On May 14, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Doug Tucker wrote:
>
> > ...all but dead...I run a usenet server here, had 3 logins last
> > month...user base is over 4000...
>
Usenet is almost dead but e-mail lists abound (you ar
> This is linked from the CentOS FAQ:
>
> http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html
>
> Akemi
LOL! This is just TOO good.
1. Because it is proper Usenet Etiquette.
...all but dead...I run a usenet server here, had 3 logins last
month...user base is over 4000...
2.We use a good news reader
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 13:00 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> Doug Tucker wrote:
> > Do you honestly, like having to scroll down with the rolly thing on your
> > mouse 9 times to get to the reply only to find it is not something you
> > cared to read? I say toss it at the top i
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:37 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> Doug Tucker wrote:
> > My whole issue is around GFS, which is officially supported (someone
> > else hijacked this thread with XFS which got more attention), and in my
> > statement I said: "Keep in mind this is n
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:38 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 11:07 -0700, MHR wrote:
> >> 1) You're top posting - please stop it. In this email list, we bottom
> >> post as
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 11:07 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend to do that. Kernel's removed from automatic updates.
> >
> There you go.
>
> > We'll agree to disagree about the i
ur entire user data resides on, we (the
linux community) would be throwing them under the rug for it.
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 05:44 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Doug Tucker wrote:
> > Tru,
> >
> > I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test
>
2008-05-13 at 13:13 -0230, Scott Thistle wrote:
> Sorry. Misread your requirement..
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Doug Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> gfs_quota command does NOT exist on clients that are mounting
> the
> cluster via n
gfs as the underlying file system, it doesn't
appear the quota values are passed to the exported nfs
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 19:15 -0230, Scott Thistle wrote:
> Use gfs_quota command.
>
> man gfs_quota
>
> gfs_quota [OPTION]
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2008
I have 2 machines in a cluster using GFS, that many client mount up via
nfs. We use quotas extensively here, is there a way from a client
machine to check a users quota? Standard quota command on client
machines do not work like they do when checking a non-gfs nfs mounted
file system. The quotas
Tru,
I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test
environments :). Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated
at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded
with no GFS so it went bye-bye. Is the GFS being installed, compiled
against particula
This is the 2nd time this has happened to me. There was a kernel
release over the weekend to .67.0.15, yet, they did not release the
updated GFS to go along with it, so when the machine rebooted, there was
no gfs file system in the new running kernel which in turn wreaked havoc
on my cluster. I t
tool /sbin
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 09:24 -0500, Doug Tucker wrote:
> Anyone??
>
> On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 10:12 -0500, Doug Tucker wrote:
> > I have a 2 node cluster that has been running for a year, and is still
> > up and working fine. However, a yum update at some point brok
Anyone??
On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 10:12 -0500, Doug Tucker wrote:
> I have a 2 node cluster that has been running for a year, and is still
> up and working fine. However, a yum update at some point broke
> system-config-cluster and it cannot load the management tab anymore,
> becaus
I have a 2 node cluster that has been running for a year, and is still
up and working fine. However, a yum update at some point broke
system-config-cluster and it cannot load the management tab anymore,
because it *thinks* the node is not part of a cluster, yet, all of the
definions are there and
em.
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 11:25 -0600, Doug Tucker wrote:
> I have a cluster that has been operational for some time and functioning
> flawlessly until a recent yum update. The last unflawed working kernel
> was 2.6.9-55.0.12.ELsmp. The current kernel is 2.6.9-67ELsmp. The
> pr
disted_export
started
And then starts over at the beginning again continuously. This is a
production system and this behaviour is causing the clients to hang (of
course) during the restart. Thanks much for your help!
Sincerely,
Doug Tucker
___
CentOS
23 matches
Mail list logo
