On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Les Mikesell
wrote:
> However, I can start a chrome connection to gmail and it just goes
> direct (which happens to work, I just prefer the proxy which will use
> a different outbound route). If I go to any non-google site, it uses
> the proxy and will pop up
I'm running a memory check right now, just to rule things out.
Gé
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:36 PM, wrote:
> Gé Weijers wrote:
> > Thanks for answering.
> >
> > a) The workstation has:
> > - CPU E5-2687W
> > - 32 GB RAM (ECC)
> > - AMD FirePro V7900
BTW: I just saw those 'oopses', or I would have mentioned them right away.
I'm seriously suspecting the RAID controller.
Gé
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Gé Weijers wrote:
> Thanks for answering.
>
> a) The workstation has:
> - CPU E5-2687W
> - 32 GB R
---[ end trace a0e1ee14d68f0684 ]---
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:02 PM, wrote:
> Gé Weijers wrote:
> > I'm getting a lot of this at boottime:
> >
> > udev still not settled. Waiting.
> > udevadm settle - timeout of 0 seconds reached, the event queue contains:
> > /sys
I'm getting a lot of this at boottime:
udev still not settled. Waiting.
udevadm settle - timeout of 0 seconds reached, the event queue contains:
/sys/module/scsi_wait_scan (11707)
udev still not settled. Waiting.
udevadm settle - timeout of 0 seconds reached, the event queue contains:
/sys/mo
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Fred Smith
wrote:
> they may have been there forever, but I never noticed them before.
> This system is an AMD Phenom-II X2 CPU on a Gigabyte MA770-UD3 motherboard.
>
> I have no idea which BIOS option I need to change to solve this, I see
> nothing in the setup t
The latest and greatest driver for AMD/ATI FirePro 3D cards (I use the
V7900) now works with the X.Org version used by CentOS 6.4. Previous
versions only worked on 6.3 and earlier, requiring a rollback of X11 and
Mesa RPMs.
That's not longer necessary. Everything seems to work with the 12.104.2
dr
I've not been able to get a FirePro V7900 to work. This card does not use
the regular ATI drivers, so the 13.1 test driver is useless.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Trevor Cooper wrote:
>
> On 03/10/2013 03:45 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
> > On 10/03/13 01:24, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> >> Akemi Y
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Nux! wrote:
> I tried building Chromium in the past for EL6 and I gave up as it was
> too difficult for me. Of course someone else might succeed in doing so,
> but even in that case, for how long can he/she keep up with backporting
> updates and so on?
>
It would
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
>
> Whilst bowing in due deference to people who've been using *nix/Linux
> since it required a piece of string, two tin cans & coven in order to
> achieve results, I was under the impression that nowadays, unless you
> actually need some functio
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 11:30 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Aug 10 17:44:56 sshd[12350]: Connection from 114.113.199.142
>> port 511
>> 871
>> Aug 10 17:44:57 sshd[12341]: Received disconnect from
>> 114.113.199.1
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Sun JDS Linux was damn good (included Java and StarOffice preloaded,
> and a cool Gnome theme).
>
> I used (purchased!) both JDS Linux 2003 and JDS Linux R2.
> JDS Linux R3 was in beta by the time the Solaris militia won the
> internal bat
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> I just don't see the value proposition of OL from a user perspective.
I'd only consider OL if I was running Oracle software on top of it.
"One throat to choke", as Scott McNealy used to say.
--
Gé
_
This is likely to be a bug in RHEL5 rather than one in RHEL6. RHEL5
(kernel 2.6.18) does not always guarantee that the disk cache is
flushed before 'fsync' returns. This is especially true if you use
software RAID and/or LVM. You may be able to get the old performance
back by disabling I/O barriers
It may not be a bug, it may be that RHEL 6.x implements I/O barriers
correctly, which slows things down but keeps you from losing data
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:18 AM, wrote:
> Thought I'd post this here, too - I emailed it to the redhat list, and
> that's pretty moribund, while I've seen r
On Wednesday, June 20, 2012, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>
> I think google/gmail gives you 10 gigs for free these days. Or at the
> cost of ignoring the ads on the right side if you use the web
> interface, but you can use imap if you want. Before they offered imap
> I used to use fetchmail to pull to
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Ge,
>
> Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would
> partition the drive for the installation.
Any way you'd like. CentOS can't BOOT from a GPT partitioned device if
the BIOS does not support it, but you can cer
Here's the low-tech approach: put /boot on a memory stick, and boot
from that (assuming your BIOS can be set to boot of a USD device).
/boot usually only get access when you do kernel updates.
--
Gé
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://list
The magic is called DKMS.
--
Gé
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Hal Davison wrote:
> Noted that xterm by default uses 24 lines
> per window.
>
> I have reviewed /etc/termcap looking for a
> specific entry for xterm that I can edit
> to change the ln#24 to ln#25 for our
> application.
Text-mode applications should get their screen size fr
I am investigating an Apache change I was told about that involved
adding apache22_http_accept_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf, but I don't
think this exists on CentOS 5.
You'd do that on FreeBSD. FreeBSD can collect a complete HTTP request in
the kernel and only wake up Apache when the data i
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> RHEL is much better about that, although by now the "production" RHEL
> 5 is 4 years out of date, the "leading edge" RHEL 6 is now one year
> out of date after the lengthy release testing, and CentOS will always
> lag that.
I believe "out of date
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Rob Kampen wrote:
Gé Weijers wrote:
I'd support the above hardware as a minimum - it appears most will be
reading, thus software RAID1
will work just fine - If there are many different files, I'd go for more
smaller disks - say 8 by
500G in RAID1, thus the
50 simultaneous users will require more than a bargain desktop PC.
I would go for low-end server hardware, which will get you ECC memory and
more SATA ports. The cost is probably not significantly more than a _good_
quality desktop system.
You may want to allow for some expansion, 2 To may gr
If you log in on CentOS (or Ubuntu or anything Linux and modern) using a
graphical console >>DO NOT START ssh-agent<<. The standard startup scripts
run one for you, and when you log out it dies. I assume that's what you
want.
The 'deamon' version is designed to run the following way in a
.p
010, Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Hi All,
I cannot seem to find a resource that will allow me to RAID5 3 x 1tb drives on
system install. Can this be done?
-jason
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://l
26 matches
Mail list logo
