Re: [CentOS] RedHat to CentOS packages

2011-08-02 Thread Gabriel Tabares
> How do you use nagios to cve monitoring? Is there plugin available for that? > We're ussing OSSIM, as it integrates Nagios and Nessus. My guess is that you could probably write a Nagios plugin to query Nessus but we haven't needed to look into that yet ;) __

[CentOS] RedHat to CentOS packages

2011-08-01 Thread Gabriel Tabares
TPD as the example): CentOS httd-2.2.3-43.el5.centos.3 is equivalent to RedHat httpd-2.2.3-43.el5_5.3 So, it looks like CentOS replaces "_$MINOR_RELEASE" (in this case "_5") with ".centos" . Is this a fair assumption or are there other rules we are missing? Is this docum

Re: [CentOS] How to strip out the title bar from xterm windows on CentOS 5 GNOME?

2010-12-17 Thread Gabriel Tabares
> Hi. Running CentOS 5 with the default GNOME desktop. Is it possible > to configure xterm windows not to have title bars to get the most out of > the available screenspace? I don't know how to do it with Gnome but, with KDE 3, you can set up a shortcut to remove the window decorations on a per

Re: [CentOS] OT: programming language for morons (newbie friendly language in Open Source world)

2010-12-14 Thread Gabriel Tabares
> Hi folks > > I have more than 12 years experience with UNIX system administration, > but I am too stupid for programming. My only programming experience is > shell scripting. I tried to learn Java, but don't understand it > because it is too complicated for my limited brainpower. > > What program

Re: [CentOS] yum/RPM behaviour: does yum/RPM overwrite a file modified by a user during an update ?

2010-11-29 Thread Gabriel Tabares
> a very easy. But what will yum/RPM do during the next update ? Will it > overwrite the file ? Will it write on display that the file was modified > by an user (as under debian) ? > As far as I can tell, if the file is marked as a configuration file in the RPM, it will be left alone and the new

Re: [CentOS] upgrading Centos-Xen when version 6 comes along

2010-11-18 Thread Gabriel Tabares
> The biggest single up-front difference for me on CentOS machines was > that KVM hosts default to NAT on a private bridge while Xen hosts > default to straight bridging. Some network tweaks are necessary to get > KVM hosts to live on a straight bridge. Sorry, I forgot to add to this before. If y

Re: [CentOS] upgrading Centos-Xen when version 6 comes along

2010-11-18 Thread Gabriel Tabares
> Also, if you assign MACs to your VMs at installation time (I do, for > DHCP- and DNS-related reasons), you should note that KVM MACs lives in > a different namespace: 54:52:00:xx:xx:xx. You can change the allocated MAC address by editing the files in /etc/libvirt/qemu . Edit the section and y

Re: [CentOS] good shell script examples?

2010-11-16 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 15/11/2010 18:47, Kill Script wrote: > I am looking for a beginner guide to shell scripting simple tasks on > CentOS (e.g. ssh'ing into a server / router / switch, checking for > certain things, then exiting and going to the next IP). If you don't want to use ssh keys, you will have to write sc

Re: [CentOS] updating to gtk+ >= 2.0

2010-11-15 Thread Gabriel Tabares
>> In that case: >> >> yum install gtk2 gtk2-devel > > Funny thing is those are already installed. > > However I require a later version of gtk+. > > I'm attempting to compile from source. > CentOS comes with an old version of GTK 2. Most application these days require a later version of the libr

Re: [CentOS] RPM/YUM on CentOS 5.4 issue - multiple versions of the same package installed

2010-11-15 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 11/11/2010 13:47, Gabriel Tabares wrote: > Hi all, > > We currently have an issue with multiple versions of a custom package > being installed. The RPM contains a liquibase script (a Java-based DB > change management tool) and a %post script to run liquibase. > > We are in

Re: [CentOS] xServes are dead ;-( / SAN Question

2010-11-15 Thread Gabriel Tabares
> I tought of that, and I will be needing something like this, since I have > some services that need to be restarted in the event of them dying or being > killed. > > But I'm not that much confortable scripting a modification of the initab to > activate / deactivate services on a server-by-serve

[CentOS] RPM/YUM on CentOS 5.4 issue - multiple versions of the same package installed

2010-11-11 Thread Gabriel Tabares
Hi all, We currently have an issue with multiple versions of a custom package being installed. The RPM contains a liquibase script (a Java-based DB change management tool) and a %post script to run liquibase. We are installing with scripts that run "yum update liquibase-script". If the %post s

Re: [CentOS] Network cards not recognised

2010-09-13 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 12/09/2010 14:54, Mogens Kjaer wrote: > On 09/11/2010 05:04 PM, Gabriel Tabares wrote: > ... >> Unluckily, I have no physical access to the machine, so removing cards >> is not an option. > Do you have iLO access to the machine? > > Then you should be able to di

Re: [CentOS] Network cards not recognised

2010-09-11 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 11/09/2010 15:52, Larry Vaden wrote: > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Gabriel Tabares > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have a HP DL385 G6 server that is having an issue. Two of the 4 >> network cards are not being recognised by Linux. >> >> We ha

[CentOS] Network cards not recognised

2010-09-11 Thread Gabriel Tabares
Hi, We have a HP DL385 G6 server that is having an issue. Two of the 4 network cards are not being recognised by Linux. We have quite a few other servers with the same hardware and no issues but, before I call HP, I would like to make sure that I am not doing anything wrong :) I have tried

Re: [CentOS] Wrapper package / yum repository

2010-09-08 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 07/09/2010 17:47, Steve Huff wrote: > On Sep 7, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote: > >> tomcat-6.0.26-1.13 >> adm-app-conf-18-2010.09.01 >> jdk-1.6.0_20-2.0 >> ant-1.8.1-1 > > there's your problem. in the specfile, these dependencies should

Re: [CentOS] Update to base release

2010-09-07 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 07/09/2010 16:22, John Kennedy wrote: > Hello All, > We have some machines running CentOS 4 Update 4 (4.4). We want to > update these boxes to the stock CentOS 4 Update 8 (4.8). > We have the 4.8 iso images. Is it possible to use up2date and have it > use the 4.8 mounted iso images on a remo

Re: [CentOS] Wrapper package / yum repository

2010-09-07 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 07/09/2010 15:55, Steve Huff wrote: > rpm -qp --requires tomcat-6.0.26-1.13 adm-app-conf-18-2010.09.01 jdk-1.6.0_20-2.0 ant-1.8.1-1 /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 ___ CentOS ma

[CentOS] Wrapper package / yum repository

2010-09-07 Thread Gabriel Tabares
Hi, I am setting up a yum repository for our applications and I am having a bit of trouble. I copy the files to a webserver, run createrepo and then configure the servers to use it. One of the RPMs is a "release" package that includes exact versions of all the binary and configuration files

Re: [CentOS] ip aliasing on bonded interface possible?

2010-09-06 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 05/09/2010 18:33, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > Has anyone successfully created a bonded interface (bond0) with say > two nics AND also then aliased that interface to get bond0 and bond0:1 > (for an alias ip) > > I just want to know if it's possible and reliable > Possible and seems to be quite s

Re: [CentOS] bridge

2010-09-03 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 03/09/2010 10:59, mattias wrote: > Ifcfg-eth1 > > > # Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ > > DEVICE=eth1 > > > > HWADDR=00:50:FC:F9:84:CB > > ONBOOT=yes > > DHCP_HOSTNAME=vps.mjw.se > > BRIDGE=br0 > > Ifcfg-br0 > [br0] > > ONBOOT=yes > > TYPE=Bridge > > BOOTPROTO=dhcp > Can

Re: [CentOS] bridge

2010-09-03 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 03/09/2010 10:41, mattias wrote: > I try to use a bridge with openvz but get the following Bridging Support > is not available in this kernel This message are in all kernels i tryed > from the centos yum repo On a frech 5.5 It has worked before With the > same install i have used > Can you tr

Re: [CentOS] Automatically detecting LUNs without a reboot

2010-09-01 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 01/09/2010 05:00, cpol...@surewest.net wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 04:48:01PM +0100, Gabriel Tabares wrote: >>From there, I went to >> http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/html/Online_Storage_Reconfiguration_Guide/rescan-scsi-bus.html >

Re: [CentOS] Automatically detecting LUNs without a reboot

2010-08-31 Thread Gabriel Tabares
ess. >> >> I have tried kudzu, the rescan-scsi-bus.sh script and everything else I >> have found online, with no luck. The LSI tools only seem to be available >> for i386, and I would like to avoid adding the 32bit environment, if I >> can. >> >> Any help woul

Re: [CentOS] Antwort: Automatically detecting LUNs without a reboot

2010-08-31 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 31/08/2010 11:07, Andreas Reschke wrote: > > centos-boun...@centos.org wrote on 31.08.2010 11:43:50: > > > Gabriel Tabares > > Gesendet von: centos-boun...@centos.org > > > > 31.08.2010 11:44 > > > > Bitte antworten an > > CentOS m

[CentOS] Automatically detecting LUNs without a reboot

2010-08-31 Thread Gabriel Tabares
like to avoid adding the 32bit environment, if I can. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Gabriel Tabares ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] cfengine vs. puppet

2010-08-28 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 27/08/2010 19:11, Ski Dawg wrote: Stefano Sasso wrote: > 2010/8/27 Ski Dawg: >> After spending a little bit of time searching around today, I have run >> across 2 that seem like good options, cfengine and puppet. >> >> Does anyone have any thoughts about either of thes

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-28 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 25/08/2010 14:39, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Gabriel Tabares wrote: >> On 23/08/2010 21:25, Keith Roberts wrote: >>> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote: >>>> From: Gabriel Tabares >>>> On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>>&

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-28 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 25/08/2010 17:44, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > Greetings, > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On 8/23/2010 10:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote: >> >> Some servers do, some don't. > Have you tried google's DNS servers 8.8.8.

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem - kind of resolved

2010-08-28 Thread Gabriel Tabares
tried it and, as > expected, the bonding module did not come back up. > > If bad comes to worse, I could set up host entries for the main machines > in /etc/hosts, but I really am trying to avoid that. > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks > > Gabriel Tabares __

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-25 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 23/08/2010 21:25, Keith Roberts wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote: > > >> To: centos@centos.org >> From: Gabriel Tabares >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem >> >> On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >&g

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-25 Thread Gabriel Tabares
> Not sure if it is RDNS. > > I had similar issues on Fedora, and for me it was to do with IP6. > > Konqueror web browser took ages to load a page. IIRC Firefox handled > it OK. > > Try Googling for 'uninstalling ipv6 linux' > I already tried that. The /etc/sysconfig/network has the IPV6_ENABLE=n

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-23 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 23/08/2010 16:07, Giles Coochey wrote: > On Mon, August 23, 2010 17:03, Gabriel Tabares wrote: > >> On 23/08/2010 14:48, Giles Coochey wrote: >> >>> On Mon, August 23, 2010 15:43, Gabriel Tabares wrote: >>> >>> >

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-23 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 23/08/2010 15:56, Tom H wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > >> The problems can sometimes be caused by not having reverse-DNS records for >> your hosts. Can you resolve to names (any name) from an IP address? >> e.g. nslookup 10.2.9.2? >> > One more th

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-23 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 23/08/2010 14:48, Giles Coochey wrote: > On Mon, August 23, 2010 15:43, Gabriel Tabares wrote: > >> On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> >>>> Both files are the default ones from CentOS: >>>> >>>> >&g

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-23 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Both files are the default ones from CentOS: >> > So what do the host names look like that the application > attempts to resolve, fully qualified or not? What does your > cli based query look like? > > My resolv.conf is: search mydomain.co

Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-23 Thread Gabriel Tabares
On 23/08/2010 13:20, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/host.conf Both files are the default ones from CentOS: nsswitch.conf: (comments removed) -- passwd: files shadow: files group: files hosts: files dns bootparams: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] fi

[CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem

2010-08-23 Thread Gabriel Tabares
of it, I tried it and, as expected, the bonding module did not come back up. If bad comes to worse, I could set up host entries for the main machines in /etc/hosts, but I really am trying to avoid that. Any suggestions? Thanks Gabriel Tabares ___ C