Re: [CentOS] Filesystem for Maildir

2007-12-04 Thread Heitor A.M. Cardozo
Christopher Chan wrote: ext3 again takes the slowest performing title overall as expected...in fact it appears not much as changed fs vs fs wise since Bruce Guenter's tests. I agree but the values are more acceptable in comparision with others filesystems. On Bruce tests it shows a very bad

Re: [CentOS] Filesystem for Maildir

2007-12-04 Thread Heitor A.M. Cardozo
Mensagem original Assunto: Re:[CentOS] Filesystem for Maildir De: Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Data: terça-feira, 04 de dezembro de 2007 12:06:43 Heitor A.M. Cardozo wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: ext3 again takes

Re: [CentOS] Filesystem for Maildir

2007-12-03 Thread Heitor A.M. Cardozo
Christopher Chan wrote: Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote: Hi, A draft with results of my benchmark based on fsbench is available in http://www.htiweb.inf.br/benchmark/fsbench.htm. The methodology and the conclusion i will publish later,

Re: [CentOS] Filesystem for Maildir

2007-11-28 Thread Heitor A.M. Cardozo
. And sorry for my english... Heitor A.M. Cardozo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos