Dear all,
The cpufreq modules have been distributed in Centos. But recently,
I met a problem when I tried to test the power-related applications.
The module can not be modprobed in kernel notwithstanding releated
with Centos distribution.
The messgae thrown out is:
- dump of
- dump of screen
# modprobe p4-clockmod.ko
FATAL: Module p4_clockmod.ko not found
odd that you modprobe'd p4-clockmod but it complained that p4_clockmod
is missing...
or is this a typo in your post?
oh...typo (copy wrong messgae). I already tested the
You have to write:
# modprobe p4-clockmod
It means no ko extension.
Same result.
The p4-clockmod is not in
/lib/modules/2.6.29.3/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/.
But I tried the acpi-cpufreq.ko and got the same result.
-- dump of screen
# ls
---
No i do not think it is a typo because I get the same exact error that
it is missing where as it was available 2 kernels ago?
Do you mean modprobe can not find the proper module file when
it faces two and more kernels in same machine? I think this would
not happen.
File Bug Report?
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:49 PM, natecen...@linuxpowered.net wrote:
Ian jonhson wrote:
# modprobe acpi-cpufreq
FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq
(/lib/modules/2.6.29.3/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko):
No such device
That error tells me most likely your hardware
I had similar problem in the past. I used 586 kernel and it didn't work.
Do you have 686 kernel? If yes, can you send us the output of the
following commands:
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
# cat
Hi,
I make a mistake so that crash the whole system which can
not boot from hard dist. But I am sure if I can access that hard
disk, I can fix it.
Now, the problem I met is how to boot from other media such as
CD and then mount the hard disk so as to fix the mistake.
Could anybody give me some
Hi,
I have recompiled my kernel and updated it to kernel-2.6.27.
However, I found there are no more than 1G disk space left
for my jobs.
How can I free my disk space but in the same time keep
all the compiled kernel modules (*.ko files) here?
Can I remove the *.o files created by kernel
at 8:39 PM, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Ian jonhson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My jobs need to recompile the kernel codes, but I don't know
how to yum the kernel source codes.
Any help?
First look in http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Romeo Ninov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have installed kernel-devel package?
Sure. but the problem is still there.
Any help?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi,
My jobs need to recompile the kernel codes, but I don't know
how to yum the kernel source codes.
Any help?
Thanks in advance.
Ian
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
If you need a newer kernel to use that patch, I would recommend something
that runs more cutting edge for that server, maybe Gentoo or Fedora 9. I
don't recommend patching CentOS with a new kernel as you lose the main
benefit for using an Enterprise distro .. stability.
You meant I should not
It seems that you tried to patch the CentOS kernel and it didn't work.
I am doing this experiment. And, I don't know what would happen.
Different from previous work, I don't patch the kernel from www.kernel.org
but patch the one download from www.centos.org.
I would use the same version
PF_RING seems to be used for the newest version of ntop for faster packet
capture and analysis. Is that what you are trying to accomplish?
Yes. this is the reason why we turn back on PF_RING to patch the kernel.
Generally, the libpcap can not meet our need to capture the network packets.
Or
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Luca Deri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian
from the trace below I don't see an error related to PF_RING but a
soft-lockup (see below).
I have tested PF_RING on 2.6.24 and .26 and have not experienced the problem
you reported.
hmm... I have restarted the
When you use a custom kernel, you usually get to keep the pieces.
Go buy a new car and change the engine and then see if they honor the
warranty.
We stopped using Dell machines some time ago. For some reason there
reliability has been steadily falling. I don't know if they are doing
PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian jonhson wrote:
Dear All,
I selected CentOS5 in my works and installed them in two DELL
PowerEdge1950.
However, a trouble blocked me during the machines run after two days.
The machines
crashed and the syslog said it got the following messages:
-- part
BTW, the patched kernel by PF_RING is version 2.6.25.3.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian jonhson wrote:
Dear All,
I selected CentOS5 in my works and installed them in two DELL
PowerEdge1950.
However, a trouble blocked me during the machines run
Hi all,
The PF_RING seems not to work smoothly in CentOS 5.
Several day before, I patched the kernel 2.6.25.3 and
installed the PF_RING-patched kernel in my CentOS5.
Based on the PF_RING, I developed my program to capture
the network packages. I wished it can work until the
machine power is off.
CentOS 5 uses kernel 2.6.18-xx ... If this PF_RING thing requires a
different kernel, I think a more accurate statement would be, .
PF_RING is not supported on CentOS.
Indeed. I wonder whether there exists some difference between CentOS
kernel and genral kernel from www.kernel.org?
If
Dear All,
I selected CentOS5 in my works and installed them in two DELL PowerEdge1950.
However, a trouble blocked me during the machines run after two days.
The machines
crashed and the syslog said it got the following messages:
-- part dump of /var/log/messages
21 matches
Mail list logo
