On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Ian jonhson wrote:
>> I had similar problem in the past. I used 586 kernel and it didn't work.
>> Do you have 686 kernel? If yes, can you send us the output of the
>> following commands:
>>
>> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cp
> I had similar problem in the past. I used 586 kernel and it didn't work.
> Do you have 686 kernel? If yes, can you send us the output of the
> following commands:
>
> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies
>
> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_av
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:49 PM, nate wrote:
> Ian jonhson wrote:
>
>> # modprobe acpi-cpufreq
>> FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq
>> (/lib/modules/2.6.29.3/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko):
>> No such device
>
> That error tells
> ---
> No i do not think it is a typo because I get the same exact error that
> it is missing where as it was available 2 kernels ago?
>
Do you mean modprobe can not find the proper module file when
it faces two and more kernels in same machine? I think this would
not happen.
> File Bug Report?>
> You have to write:
>
> # modprobe p4-clockmod
>
> It means no "ko" extension.
>
Same result.
The p4-clockmod is not in
/lib/modules/2.6.29.3/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/.
But I tried the acpi-cpufreq.ko and got the same result.
-- dump of screen
# ls /li
>> - dump of screen
>>
>> # modprobe p4-clockmod.ko
>> FATAL: Module p4_clockmod.ko not found
>>
>
> odd that you modprobe'd p4-clockmod but it complained that p4_clockmod
> is missing...
>
> or is this a typo in your post?
>
>
oh...typo (copy wrong messgae). I already t
Dear all,
The cpufreq modules have been distributed in Centos. But recently,
I met a problem when I tried to test the power-related applications.
The module can not be modprobed in kernel notwithstanding releated
with Centos distribution.
The messgae thrown out is:
- dump of screen
Hi,
I make a mistake so that crash the whole system which can
not boot from hard dist. But I am sure if I can access that hard
disk, I can fix it.
Now, the problem I met is how to boot from other media such as
CD and then mount the hard disk so as to fix the mistake.
Could anybody give me some a
Hi,
I have recompiled my kernel and updated it to kernel-2.6.27.
However, I found there are no more than 1G disk space left
for my jobs.
How can I free my disk space but in the same time keep
all the compiled kernel modules (*.ko files) here?
Can I remove the *.o files created by kernel compiling
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Romeo Ninov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have installed kernel-devel package?
>
Sure. but the problem is still there.
Any help?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/c
008 at 8:39 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:14 AM, Ian jonhson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My jobs need to recompile the kernel codes, but I don't know
>> how to yum the kernel source codes.
>>
>>
Hi,
My jobs need to recompile the kernel codes, but I don't know
how to yum the kernel source codes.
Any help?
Thanks in advance.
Ian
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> It seems that you tried to patch the CentOS kernel and it didn't work.
I am doing this experiment. And, I don't know what would happen.
Different from previous work, I don't patch the kernel from www.kernel.org
but patch the one download from www.centos.org.
I would use the same version (kernel
> If you need a newer kernel to use that patch, I would recommend something
> that runs more cutting edge for that server, maybe Gentoo or Fedora 9. I
> don't recommend patching CentOS with a new kernel as you lose the main
> benefit for using an Enterprise distro .. stability.
You meant I should
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Luca Deri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian
> from the trace below I don't see an error related to PF_RING but a
> soft-lockup (see below).
>
> I have tested PF_RING on 2.6.24 and .26 and have not experienced the problem
> you reported.
hmm... I have restarted the
> PF_RING seems to be used for the newest version of ntop for faster packet
> capture and analysis. Is that what you are trying to accomplish?
Yes. this is the reason why we turn back on PF_RING to patch the kernel.
Generally, the libpcap can not meet our need to capture the network packets.
> Or
> When you use a custom kernel, you usually get to keep the pieces.
>
> Go buy a new car and change the engine and then see if they honor the
> warranty.
>
> We stopped using Dell machines some time ago. For some reason there
> reliability has been steadily falling. I don't know if they are doing
>
> CentOS 5 uses kernel 2.6.18-xx ... If this PF_RING thing requires a
> different kernel, I think a more accurate statement would be, .
> PF_RING is not supported on CentOS.
Indeed. I wonder whether there exists some difference between CentOS
kernel and genral kernel from www.kernel.org?
If
Hi all,
The PF_RING seems not to work smoothly in CentOS 5.
Several day before, I patched the kernel 2.6.25.3 and
installed the PF_RING-patched kernel in my CentOS5.
Based on the PF_RING, I developed my program to capture
the network packages. I wished it can work until the
machine power is off. U
BTW, the patched kernel by PF_RING is version 2.6.25.3.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian jonhson wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I selected CentOS5 in my works and installed them in two DELL
>> PowerEdge1950.
>
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ian jonhson wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I selected CentOS5 in my works and installed them in two DELL
>> PowerEdge1950.
>> However, a trouble blocked me during the machines run after two days.
>> The machines
>
Dear All,
I selected CentOS5 in my works and installed them in two DELL PowerEdge1950.
However, a trouble blocked me during the machines run after two days.
The machines
crashed and the syslog said it got the following messages:
-- part dump of /var/log/messages
22 matches
Mail list logo
