m loath to redo it. But I will if
needsbe.
I will take the opportunity to run fsck on the system HDD while in a live dvd
mode.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Ma
pped me into give a "File-based locking initialisation failed."
when I try to run vgdisplay or vgs.
Any guidance appreciated.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow l
attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E
links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E
ttachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 07
ot to
networks having differing cidr masks?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario
e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905
nsitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario
On Wed, June 20, 2018 15:37, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/20/2018 11:19 AM, James B. Byrne via CentOS wrote:
>> I am encountering messages similar to this in the system logfile:
>>
>> Jun 20 13:38:18 inet03 named[3720]: malformed tr
, what caused it, nor how to fix it.
Any suggestions relevant to any of the above are most welcome.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrne
CURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
H
esult of recent changes made to the extensions
interface. I can hardly wait to see what is broken with v57.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrne
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario
ot@lcomp5 ~]#
>
>
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.ha
ttachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
_
That decision is site
specific.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne
rack units its fans sounded like a jet taking off. This
turned out to be a known problem and the final fix was a BIOS update
from SM.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E
error
What does this mean and how do I fix it?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Lim
able benefit to
the parties tasked with dealing them. Systemd is not the problem. It
is a symptom of a deeper malaise, indifference.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-
. They are symptoms of a fundamental difference of focus
between what our firm needs and what the Linux community wants.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrne
tage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd? Are you
> still ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to
> it?
>
A. FreeBSD-11.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments n
here a way to get the non-day-lite savings time
> zone ?
> For example EST is valid - EDT is not.
>
date -u
Wed Apr 5 20:18:45 UTC 2017
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links
NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox
ing is seriously wrong somewhere.
As shown above I have since reconfigured grub.conf to fallback to the
last working kernel. Nonetheless, I would like guidance on how to
proceed with fixing/removing the broken one.
Suggestions?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
D
-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive
an upgrade or replacement for speex. One just conflicts
with the other.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne
ted in an LV assigned to a libvirt pool
associated with a single vm. Can this be checked and corrected
without having to deal with the base system? If so then how?
Regards,
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open at
On Thu, March 9, 2017 09:46, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> This indicated that a bad sector on the underlying disk system might
>> be the source of the problem. The guests were all shutdown, a
>> /forcefsck file was created on the h
ing over?
2. How do I get the fsck issue with dm-6 resolved?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte &am
On Fri, February 10, 2017 15:44, Alice Wonder wrote:
> On 02/10/2017 12:34 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, February 10, 2017 06:26, Patrick Begou wrote:
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I have more and more troubles using firefox in professional
>>>
CURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive
achments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
J45 ports in hotel rooms with wi-fi frequently
no longer active and simply relics of an earlier Internet service.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
Ja
o the certificate(s) support?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited htt
invalid?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.
follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canad
NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton,
tput and 'php
-i' is certainly handier when in a terminal session on the host.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrne
don't frequently use.
Most of us have that problem; head injuries or not.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@h
/username
>
> Hope it helps
>
>
Is SELinux enabled? If so then what does 'audit2why -l -a' say?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James
T transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +
On Mon, June 27, 2016 12:29, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/26/2016 01:50 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> However, all I am seeking is knowledge on how to handle this using
>> iptables. I am sure that this defect/anomaly has already been
>> solved wherever it is an issue.
On Fri, June 24, 2016 12:24, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 6/24/2016 9:20 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> We received a notice from our pci-dss auditors respecting this:
>>
>> CVE-2002-0510 The UDP implementation in Linux 2.4.x kernels keeps
>> the
>> IP Identification
an example somewhere?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.
On Mon, June 20, 2016 13:16, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/20/2016 07:47 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not interested in turning this in to a discussion on
>>> epistemology.
>>> This is ba
On Sat, June 18, 2016 18:39, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/18/2016 02:49 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Fri, June 17, 2016 21:40, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>> https://letsencrypt.org/2015/11/09/why-90-days.html
>> With respect citing another person's or people's op
em is a significant risk in my opinion.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte
On Fri, June 17, 2016 11:06, Walter H. wrote:
> On 17.06.2016 16:46, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Thu, June 16, 2016 13:53, Walter H. wrote:
>>> On 15.06.2016 16:17, Warren Young wrote:
>>>> but it also affects the other public CAs: you canât get a
>>&g
On Fri, June 17, 2016 12:31, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Fri, June 17, 2016 10:19 am, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> Keys issued to individuals certainly should have short time limits
>> on them. In the same way that user accounts on systems should
>> always have
uild the devices. But we all have to do that
already. Bought any USB devices from China recently?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemail
rusted-ssl-certificates-for-its-domains-made-in-france/
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne
on.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockle
- in the standard repo naming exactly the same packages as
those included elsewhere. You can use globbing in the package names
in both cases.
It is a little more work to set up but it is a lot safer to my way of
thinking, particularly where there are multiple sysadmins involved.
--
***
led then try this:
restorecon -R ~/.ssh
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte &
On Mon May 9 2016 15:24:20 UTC, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
>>On Mon, May 9, 2016 10:26, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>> Any ideas as to what happened and how to fix it?
>>
>
> It looks like your package update was interrupted by a
> SIGHUP signal (that's wh
ppening here?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.c
data via e-Mail
Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 9
complete the update. In fact,
anything of that nature would benefit from requiring a special switch
to install so that 'yum update' would not break a running system.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
D
o hide that, use a proxy server. ((GBWG))
>
>
On the other hand, setting it to 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0' would make one look like the
latest TOR browser. Which, if CentOS set Firefox to that by default,
would make identifying TOR users a g
o NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada
sured by
'forgetting' the key. But encrypting an SSD after the material is put
on it is not sufficient.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Lim
>
I use vim/gvim together with numerous add-ons from Tim Pope.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte
Os. So my question is: What
has changed to cause this behaviour? Any ideas?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.h
he former then they will be back and you
will need to consider how to deal with the next assault.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited h
3 without problems. The load on the fax host is trivial.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Dri
o the
kernel in a manner similar to how KVM made its way.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley D
onics when
> everything went to surface mount.
>
>
Kids these days! I remember taking the vacuum tubes to the testing
centre in the corner drug-store to see which ones need replacing.
Apologies to the four Yorkshiremen.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel
68.51.41?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton
cannot determine is exactly what package(s) is/are required.
What is the minimal package set needed to enable chrooted users to
perform dns lookups on CentOS-6?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrne
yesterday to this host and this may be an intended
alteration. However, can anyone confirm this for me? Or, otherwise
explain what has happened?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn
p work as I imaging? What would be the correct
static routing table entries to make it work?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited
to calibre-tarball.txz below as appropriate:
sudo mkdir -p /opt/calibre && sudo rm -rf /opt/calibre/* && sudo
tar xvf /path/to/downloaded/calibre-tarball.txz -C /opt/calibre &&
sudo /opt/calibre/calibre_postinstall
HTH.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel
t;
>
I am running LO-5.0.3.2 on CentoS-6.7. without any known issues.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.ha
form was, in large
part, to reduce the resources given over to managing the software. It
would be ironic in the extreme were the reverse prove the case.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrne
or not having paid
enough attention to that item.
Am I correct?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Broc
On Mon, December 7, 2015 13:41, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:03:50AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:50:38PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> > For laptops, great. For anything else, not so much. For example,
>>
orld moves on and we perforce move with it
or are left behind.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley
has
already released.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, On
s incident report.
It may not be intuitive to some but it is certainly the logical way of
handling this.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Li
r or are they
caused by something I am doing wrong? If so then what do I need to do
to eliminate them?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited
virtual guests?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hami
ail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905
If not, then What are the implications of creating a custom policy to
handle this using the output given above?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte &am
Hit reply instead of reply all. This is for the list.
-- Original Message --
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can one construct an IPTables rule to block on
NS records?
From:"James B. Byrne"
Date:Wed, October 7, 2015 08:52
To: &quo
sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E
channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario
On Wed, September 30, 2015 09:33, James B. Byrne wrote:
> If I log into a host via ssh from my workstation then I can enter
> this:
>
> shutdown -r +90&
>
> and log out. The shutdown command will continue in effect and will
> activae 90 minutes later.
>
> However
n command does not remain in effect. Why is this so
and is there some way to achieve this?
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http
explanation.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hami
airs on a
sinking ship. It does not address the fundamental issue. Plus
assignment to a non-standard port adds to maintenance and support load
since it must be separately accounted for each time it is referenced.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT t
0/443
so we do not even see it any more, except via proxy. Taiwan is nearly
in the same boat and Vietnam is next in the queue.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne
On Sat, September 19, 2015 06:51, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article
> ,
James B. Byrne wrote:
>> After some experimenting I have observed that overriding settings from
>> /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf in
>> /etc/logwatch/conf/logwatch.conf doe
annel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada
in alphabetic order, along with the other services which simply take
the implicit default value.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limi
On Mon, September 14, 2015 14:51, James B. Byrne wrote:
> The Logwatch imapd service script distributed with CentOS-6 does not
> generate anything when I run logwatch --service all on a cyrus-imapd
> host. Is this expected behaviour? Is there a separate script for
> cyrus-imapd
On Mon, September 14, 2015 21:28, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 14:51 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> The Logwatch imapd service script distributed with CentOS-6 does not
>> generate anything when I run logwatch --service all on a cyrus-imapd
>&
e-Mail
James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
___
Ce
1 - 100 of 854 matches
Mail list logo
