Re: [CentOS] Cons of disabling *.i386 and *.i686 in a 64bit Distribution

2011-09-15 Thread James Nguyen
I haven't seen this option before. Let me do some googling and see if it fits into the solution I'm looking for. Thanks =) On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:02 AM, John Doe wrote: > From: James Nguyen > > > So the premise for this question is that I setup an exclude=*.i368,*

Re: [CentOS] Cons of disabling *.i386 and *.i686 in a 64bit Distribution

2011-09-14 Thread James Nguyen
that I don't need or nor run. I treat my services the same. If you don't need it, don't run it. =) -- > If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me on +61 478 > 241 896. > > Regards, > Christopher Hawker > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:52 AM, J

[CentOS] Cons of disabling *.i386 and *.i686 in a 64bit Distribution

2011-09-14 Thread James Nguyen
Can anybody give me a reason why this would be a bad idea. So the premise for this question is that I setup an exclude=*.i368,*.i686 in my yum.conf. While doing a yum update I come across missing package dependencies for instance mkinitrd for the i386 package. I noticed there is already one for

Re: [CentOS] managing a rack full of centos servers

2011-09-05 Thread James Nguyen
I'm managing two data centers and some instances on rackspace cloud servers. Currently running Cobbler+Puppet+Mcollective. So far it's been great for a team of one, myself. At the moment I'm looking into either using Aeolus or Openstack to bridge the gap of my data centers and the public cloud s

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?

2011-03-07 Thread James Nguyen
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 12:11 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 03/04/11 11:59 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >>> I'm looking forward to the new cgroups and KVM.  This will give it >>> >  some capabilities similar to AIX virtual partitions which can divvy up >>> >  CPUs at a fine resolution. >> Really? So

Re: [CentOS] Load balancing...

2011-03-04 Thread James Nguyen
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:25 AM, wrote: > James Nguyen wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Todd wrote: >>> Brian, >>> Thanks for all of the great words here. I appreciate the detail in your >>> reply. >>>> >>>> OK, so what'

Re: [CentOS] Load balancing...

2011-03-04 Thread James Nguyen
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Todd wrote: > Brian, > Thanks for all of the great words here. I appreciate the detail in your > reply. >> >> OK, so what's good?  For my requirements, HAProxy is excellent.  It >> handled sticky sessions well, performs monitoring of each host, allows >> dynamic add

Re: [CentOS] Does anybody know a PeerGuardian like app?

2011-02-03 Thread James Nguyen
moblock is for linux On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:04 AM, S Mathias wrote: > Are there any programs blocking ip, and has frequently updated lists, like > the peerguardian on windows? > > sorry for the question, but i looking for this kind of application :O > > Thank you, and a happy christmas! > > >