Good day/night/whatever fellow techies,
I've come to a small problem managing mysql on CentOS 4.7 box[1]. When
I have done things on mysql on my desktop systems it was always just for
personal use so I would be lazy and put everything under the "test" db
so I didn't have to deal with all
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 13:14 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> It's about time someone did that. I completely gave up on Fedora
> after version 6 and unsubscribed from the mail list because they were
> only interested in changing things and adding features, not making
> anything work. Has it become us
Hello all,
I am having a problem running yum after doing the 4.6 upgrade. I did
a live update through yum and no problems were encountered. However, now
when I try to run yum (with any commands/options) I get this error right
after loading/reading the repo's -
eading repository metada
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Where ever you got it from, that is what broke your system.
It came from the atrpms repo. I downgraded and all is fine.
Thank you and to Lorenzo MartÃnez RodrÃguez for pointing me in the right
direction.
--
Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.c
Fellow list members,
I recently tried to add a user to a little used server that hadn't see
a change in users for quite a while. When I use system-config-users I
get an error alert that says -
The user database cannot be read. This problem
is most likely caused by a mis
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 00:39 -0800, Garrick Staples wrote:
> > Any pointers to info on this are greatly appreciated.
>
> Just edit the file. It's fine.
Rock-n-roll, man. That did the trick. You know, there would probably
be use for a tool that checked the files and made sure they w
I just did a yum update and one of the packages updated was
dovecot. I've been using this for imap/pop3 for quite a while. Now,
however, I get an error when trying to login under any account. It gives
"bad user or password" errors for every user. The user can ssh in just
fine and run mut
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Scott Silva wrote:
Anyone run into this? I was planning to upgrade the box to CentOS 5
next month but I may do it sooner if it will fix this.
Do you by any chance have atrpms enabled as a repo?
As it happens, yes. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?
--
Bo
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
Do you by any chance have atrpms enabled as a repo?
As it happens, yes. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?
A good thing definitely. :)
What version of dovecot is now on your system? E.g. what's rpm -q
dovecot saying?
$ rpm -q dovecot
dove
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Because this stuff takes time to design and build and I need to do the
job I get paid for SINCE noone will donate money to the CentOS Project
and I have to eat?
I would love to donate anything I could to CentOS. However, I am
not in a situation to
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
$ rpm -q dovecot
dovecot-1.0.1-1_57.el4
That's an ATrpms version (living in atrpms-testing).
Hmm, I don't have the atrpms-testing repo enabled.
I was thinking of dropping back to an earlier version to see if
that makes a difference.
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
Personally I would recommend fixing the above, as the dovecot version
as shipped by the upstream vendor (0.99.11 from 2004) is not
maintained by the author anymore. See
http://wiki.dovecot.org/UpgradingDovecot
Just for grins I did a yum se
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
$ rpm -V dovecot
. c /etc/dovecot.conf
This output means that /etc/dovecot.conf was modified. If it had been
modified before the upgrade then the new config file lands under
/etc/dovecot.conf.rpmnew.
That's right, I did change the example email
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Scott Silva wrote:
Do you have a /etc/dovecot.conf.rpmnew?
Maybe you need to diff the files and see if something changed.
No .rpmnew or .rpmold or any variation.
If you were running 0.99 from stock CentOS before the upgrade, then you
definitely need to fix your c
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
Was that the previous version? If so then the breakage is serious, as
1.0.1 is considered a stable bugfix release over 1.0.0. Please feed me
(or directly the dovecot list) with any information you can gather.
(Until now I though you were running 0.99.x p
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Dave Hatton wrote:
I've had a similar problem that I haven't been able to resolve yet.
I downgraded to dovecot 1.0.0 (from atrpms) and all is well.
I think that the authentication methods are changing and I was planning
some research tomorrow.
Hope this helps.
It doe
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
I found a bug in the pam_stack autodetection part of the
specfile. This can explain any authentication issues with dovecot on
CentOS4 and 3 (5 is safe). There will be 1.0.1-1_58 very soon to fix
this, thanks for spotting this!
Ha! See? My ex-wife was w
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Dave Hatton wrote:
I have rpms for 1.0.0 / Centos4 stored here - which I can make available
to you if you need?
Although I see Axelis going to produce a fix very soon now so maybe you
won't need them.
Let me know
Thanks, Dave, but I'll just wait for the updated updat
18 matches
Mail list logo
