Re: [CentOS] fstab, unusual behavior of "missing UUID"

2013-07-06 Thread John Austin
On Sat, 2013-07-06 at 10:40 -0500, Joseph Hesse wrote: > I have the following as the last line of my /etc/fstab file on a > computer running CentOS6.4.. > > UUID=3b550884-8d05-41a5-a205-17b6d7269dd1 /mnt ext3 > rw,suid,dev,exec,noauto,nouser,async 0 2 > > The UUID refers to an ext3 partition

Re: [CentOS] acrobat reader for x86_64?

2013-03-05 Thread John Austin
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 10:28 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Fred Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:45:40AM +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> > Behalf Of Fred Smith > >> > > >> > Adobe doesn't seem to have acroread for x86_64 linux, or at least I > >> > don't see it anywhere. > >> > > >> > A

Re: [CentOS] make /home/user without all the maps

2012-09-26 Thread John Austin
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:13 +0100, Nux! wrote: > On 26.09.2012 11:30, Johan Vermeulen wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > I would like to make a whole lot of homedirs without Documents, > > Downloads , > > like it was in CentOs5. > > > > I know I have to adapt something in /etc/skel but cannot find o

Re: [CentOS] Best way to duplicate a live Centos 5 server?

2012-07-09 Thread John Austin
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 09:00 -0700, aurfalien wrote: > On Jul 8, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > > > On 7/9/12, Micky wrote: > >> The best and traditional way that has been there for decades is an rsync > >> and then reinstallation of boot-loader. > >> It works always if you know ho

Re: [CentOS] One disk speed problem [SOLVED], and a question on hdparm

2012-03-28 Thread John Austin
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 12:32 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:02 PM, wrote: > >> > >> Still, I'd have to agree with m.roth: parted(8) has a...um...classical > >> UI. It's not far advanced beyond the ex(1) school of UI design. > > > > I disagree. I don't think it's advanced

Re: [CentOS] Latest yum update cr (6.1?)

2011-12-11 Thread John Austin
On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 13:28 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 11.12.2011 13:22, schrieb John Austin: > > > > Is anyone else seeing this ? > > > > John >

[CentOS] Latest yum update cr (6.1?)

2011-12-11 Thread John Austin
Is anyone else seeing this ? John [root@maui ~]# yum update Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit

Re: [CentOS] ext4, 4k sector alignment

2011-07-25 Thread John Austin
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 13:23 -0400, R P Herrold wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Les Mikesell wrote: > > > My questions for any filesystem experts are: > > > > Is there a way to adjust the existing md partitions to get the right > > alignment for 4k sectors without having to do a file-oriented copy to

Re: [CentOS] Any known problems with kernel-2.6.18-164.el5.x86_64 / x86_64 / 3ware?

2009-09-28 Thread John Austin
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 09:02 -0400, mbneto wrote: > Hi, > > I have a server that is running centos 5.3 x86_64 that until last week > was running fine. With no error messages in console and > in /var/log/messages the server simply stops responding. > > After a reboot everything is fine. The on

Re: [CentOS] External Backup Systems?

2009-09-28 Thread John Austin
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 03:17 +0100, M. Hamzah Khan wrote: > On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 21:10 -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > At Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:40:17 +0100 CentOS mailing list > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey everyone, > > > > > > My home server just had a disk failure a few weeks ag

Re: [CentOS] Getting started with NFS

2009-07-04 Thread John Austin
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:46 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote: > JohnS a écrit : > > > > It is in the man page which is astonishing to me. > > > > Neither 'man nfs' nor 'man exports' specify any version. But I tried > again to mount the NFS share, this time by specifying a filesystem, like > this: > >

Re: [CentOS] Local root vulnerability in udev

2009-04-20 Thread John Austin
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:21 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote: > Lanny Marcus wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Lanny Marcus > > wrote: > > > >> I just saw this thread in the OLM forum. Possibly of interest, since > >> they say it includes CentOS 5, if the update hasn't been released yet. > >>