On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Try this
> http://www.howtoforge.com/creating_a_local_yum_repository_centos
What I was really looking for was a little more detail on exactly what
I *must* have from the mirror to successfully upgrade.
Would excluding everything up to the 5.4
Good afternoon folks.
Earlier today, I started upgrading a few of our servers to 5.4 based
on input from the list. So far, all has gone well. I have about 6
servers (not very many, but still) that need to be upgraded. Instead
of taking precious bits from the mirrors for each upgrade, I was
cur
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Matt wrote:
> Just curious, why the move from Debian to CentOS?
There is very little in the way of technical reasoning for it. Mostly it
was a call by those in charge.
We still have several servers running Debian doing various network
related tasks. DNS and mai
Thanks for the input folks. I think I see now that it's going to be a
pretty easy going process, and I don't need to screw around with crazy
update processes. Very good to know.
-jonathan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.or
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> But the latency over the net is much higher.
> Who knows if the kernel can handle this in all situations?
I could see it taking longer to notice a failed disk then it normally
*should*. I wonder
what type of impact this would have.
-jonat
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> You can, if you connect the iscsi block devices into one machine that can
> combine them in one or more md raid devices, put a filesystem on them, and
> export via nfs and/or smb to the systems that want shared space. However, the
If you did
Hi there folks. I've been watching the never ending "CentOS 5.4 OMG
WHEN?" threads for the last few days / weeks and had a question. I'm
pretty new to anything rpm based. I used Red Hat 9 back in college,
but that's about it. Currently, I do have a few Cent OS servers and
we're slowly migrating
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Daniel Bird wrote:
>
> Lincoln Zuljewic Silva wrote:
>> List archive: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/
>>
> Thanks for not reading my post. See "I can't find it in the archives or
> via Google" in the text below.
Spent a few minutes looking at the the arc
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
---8<
> I imagine the following scenario: someone walks into my office building with a
> laptop (a colleague, a visitor, a guest, whoever), and hooks up onto the local
> net (wired or wireless). The server detects an unknown MAC address,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 09/14/2009 05:35 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> A week or two ago someone mentioned something about using their own
>> home-grown RPMs for managing config info on their boxes.
>
> this is a really really bad idea. I'd suggest you dont waste yo
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rick Barnes wrote:
8<
> Since my switch *does* support 802.3ad, including layers 2,3 and 4
> hashing, should I use mode=4? Or would one of the other modes be
> "better" for providing fail-over and link-aggregation, specifically
> balance-tlb or balance-alb.
Are y
11 matches
Mail list logo
