Slack-Moehrle wrote on Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:18:15 -0800 (PST):
How do I stop this from happing? Do I need to buy an SSL cert?
Either that or allow the exception or import the CA cert to the browser.
This is not a CentOS issue at all. Folks, please keep off-topic questions
off the list.
Kai
--
Rudi Ahlers wrote on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:17:14 +0200:
and don't want to
downgrade the running kernel and reboot the server
you have to reboot the VM (I assume you mean this by server?), anyway,
for a new kernel.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Jacob Hydeman wrote on Sat, 9 Jan 2010 18:15:14 -0800:
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
I'm using the same setup for multiple bridges for Xen, no problem. But I
use static IP addresses. You *have* to use IP numbers from different
subnets.
I've read somewhere that STP needs to be enabled when using multiple
Frankly, you should not administer a server at all with this knowledge
level. Pragmatically spoken, you want to use WinSCP.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Rudi Ahlers wrote on Sat, 9 Jan 2010 11:27:57 +0200:
I have an issue with my XEN servers, in that when I do a yum upgrade,
it upgrades the kernels, and then updates the grub.conf file to boot
with the normal Linux kernel, and not the XEN kernel
That happens because your first installation was
More information, please.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Rudi Ahlers wrote on Sat, 9 Jan 2010 17:47:29 +0200:
In this case, I suspect the repository is incorrect, or it's not in a
common repository ? OR, is it actually part of MySQL? This particular
server already has MySQL installed, but replace isn't there.
Wow, I've never heard of it, but, yes,
For the mailing-list maintainer, mailservers to block for the latest spam
to this list:
contestjd.com
monopost.com
linkedin.com
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:18:23 +0100:
As said, I haven't seen any. But many people on the list here want to
connect to other people on social networks. That happens from time
to time.
I'm happy with that but the requests should not go to this list. Anyway,
there have been
Ralph Angenendt wrote on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:28:38 +0100:
Nope. Take a look at the complete headers of that mail - I'm sure that
there is a Reply-To: or a Sender: header in there, which has a
subscribed mail address.
Well, I can't ;-) Mailman has overwritten these. The only original clue is
For what do you need the hash? You don't supply the hash for logging in.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Roland Roland wrote on Mon, 4 Jan 2010 19:42:02 +0200:
though most of them are related to Login though I want to set PAM up for SSH
logins...
AFAIK ssh already uses PAM, look in /etc/pam.d
I've set the max erroneous logins to just THREE and even after trying
to login with an error pass I
Jerry Geis wrote on Fri, 01 Jan 2010 15:05:35 -0500:
All three machines have MX records. they all have the same domain name.
machines do not have MX records, domains have MX records. I think you
told your provider some wrong information and that's why they set it up
wrong.
It is a big
Gilbert Sebenste wrote on Fri, 1 Jan 2010 13:52:03 -0600 (CST):
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0 tests=FH_DATE_PAST_20XX,
SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Report:
* 3.4 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
add
score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0
to
Are you sure you read the OP's message(s)?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Frank M. Ramaekers wrote on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:51:10 -0600:
chroot: cannot run command `/bin/bash': No such file or directory
man chroot:
If no command is given, run ${SHELL} -i (default: /bin/sh).
Likely bash relies on some library that is not available. (this is an
error thrown by
Obviously, if you are running several vhosts and plesk you likely have
other logs to check. Also, one can usually see the origin of the mail
injection in the maillog (e.g. complaints about setting to an unsafe
sender) or in the outgoing messages. At runtime you can see the connects
with full
Sean Carolan wrote on Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:08:53 -0600:
The software the client is
using is WinSCP which does have a restart feature, however it's not
working for us.
Tell him to switch WinSCP to SCP mode.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
MySQL is *not* listening on TCP 3306 since *long* unless you tell it to in
the my.cf. It uses a local Unix socket by default.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS
Mike A. Harris wrote on Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:40:38 -0500:
And some people don't believe the Flying Spaghetti Monster exists. This
is proof.
Be careful.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
James Bensley wrote on Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:46:00 +:
Internet Explorer however only works with http://hostname/secure and
not f.q.d.n/secure? (Integrate with Windows Authentication IS
enabled).
That is because your FQDN is detected as Internet zone and that will not
use Windows
Google for remi repo
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Mhr wrote on Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:09:17 -0800:
Now you've sparked my curiosity - how is the XP firewall any better than ZA?
ZA is not just a firewall. Googling will tell you about the problems with it.
Also, in regard to other answers I've seen on the list, since I'm
using NAT, isn't
I thought I post this link
http://monty-says.blogspot.com/2009/12/help-saving-mysql.html
in case anyone isn't aware of this yet and wants to email the EC.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Mhr wrote on Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:50:27 -0800:
would it be a bad idea (or a complete waste)
to use a firewall, like ZoneAlarm, on my Windows guest OS?
Yes, using ZA is a bad idea. XP has its own firewall which is enabled by
default if you are patched up-to-date. Keep that on.
Kai
--
Kai
[r...@dom0 ~]# xenstored
[r...@dom0 ~]# FATAL: Failed to initialize dom0 state: Invalid argument
Should be already running, did you check with ps? I get this error as
well, when I try to run it while running.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
Ben M. wrote on Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:26:17 -0500:
I have been scratching my head
With or without scratching, please do not hit reply when you want to send
a *new* message to the list! Use new message!
Thanks,
Kai
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
Ben M. wrote on Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:18:29 -0500:
Oddly I am getting Saves,
Is it possible that you once used xm start for this domain? Your xm list
at the end suggests you didn't, but, well ...
AFAIK you get saves only if you added the vm to xen storage with xm start.
If you didn't then it
Billy Huddleston wrote on Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:35:43 -0500:
I'm trying to install CentOS 5.4 on a machine with a LSI SAS 1068E
controller.
It should work out of the box. I have several Dell and HP machines that
have cards based on this LSI chip and they worked straight out of the box.
You
Niki Kovacs wrote on Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:58:41 +0100:
Is there any way to disable the Hibernate option ? In the past, I've
accidentally clicked on it, which put the computer to sleep, only it
refused to wake up after that.
Hibernate isn't sleep (suspend). Usually you simply power it on
Wahyu Darmawan wrote on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:07:34 +0700:
Need your help soon.
And it doesn't come to your mind you have to provide details first?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Wahyu Darmawan wrote on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:12:43 +0700:
when i configured ip on eth2,
why don't you simply tell exactly what you did? It should be *very*
obvious to you that there is something wrong with the data (netmask?) you
entered or with the way you did it. Continued telling that you
Well, I think reality is that most of us have had very good experience
with yum-priorities. There is no thing as absolute security.
And I'm going to continue to use it, it certainly allows for a more fine-
grained control than protect-base.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at
Rob Kampen wrote on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:18:46 -0500:
On updating my server today, I noted that dnsmasq was updated, I do not
recall installing this onto my server as it is running bind/named and
dhcpd, thus why does it need dnsmasq?
Some packages require it, for instance xen/libvirt.
$
Kjs wrote on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:53:11 +:
Please put stuff that needs recycling where it belongs.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
Joe Pruett wrote on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:39:30 -0800 (PST):
i think that directory context is not just Directory, and the text at
the url says the directive may be placed in directory,
location, or
files which i assume means filesmatch as well.
Right. I was getting the German version of
Joe Pruett wrote on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:43:41 -0800 (PST):
what in the docs are you reading to indicate forcetype won't work?
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#forcetype
says it works only if given in directory-type context and that's unlikely to
happen here. You would rather set
Joseph L. Casale wrote on Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:48:05 +:
Arghh, wrong log file:) It looks like it wants to write in the root of the
virtual
hosts dir, so apache needs write access? Any php gurus know how to force it to
write those rendered images somewhere else?
Maybe here:
Ricky Tompu Breaky wrote on Mon, 16 Nov 2009 04:21:58 +0700:
I want to install Magento
Read the Magento PHP version requirements first.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
John R Pierce wrote on Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:26:08 -0800:
I had both of these on my server, and just now replaced them with
similar FilesMatch... sections.
Just a comment about the FilesMatch thing. The proposed additional
ForceType will not work in there according to the httpd docs. Not that
Scott Ehrlich wrote on Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:46:46 -0500:
Human communication is still key (like this list).
But doesn't fit the messages of this guy. He's abusing the list because
he's too lazy to educate himself and doesn't want to pay someone else with
more knowledge. Other lists would have
Neil Aggarwal wrote on Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:34:24 -0600:
Is there a command in virsh to shutdown all domains?
I can do one at a time, but that is untenable for a large
number of domains.
Not sure, but might xend or xendomains stop do this?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at
Majian wrote on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:15:51 +0800:
Could someone help me ?
On what? What's your problem?
Skipping filters plugin, no data
Skipping security plugin, no data
That's clear enough, isn't it?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:00:19 +:
After the London Beer event seams to become a regular thing I was
wondering who in Berlin would want to participate in such a thing. I
am visiting for BLIT [1] on the 21. November to promote CentOS and
was wondering how many
oops, I had intended to send in private instead of polluting the list.
Sorry to everyone!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
James B. Byrne wrote on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:06:40 -0500 (EST):
It seems that I get some variant of 192.168.122.x where I need an
you are getting this from dnsmasq. libvirt sets the dnsmasq service to on
because it relies on it for DHCP.
actual routable address in the 216.185.71.0/24 space.
David McGuffey wrote on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:44:39 -0500:
Don't be so hard on him.
I'm not trying to. Sorry, if it sounded like that. The point is that James
still seems to mix some things in his mind which apparently are not to be
mixed. He's to start over to succeed.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl,
Hadi motamedi wrote on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:22:35 +:
Can you please let me know if checking /var/log/messages can help resolving
IP conflict ?
Yes, it will normally tell you if there is a conflict.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
James B. Byrne wrote on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:23:55 -0500 (EST):
Lastly, why is qemu 4.5M but kvm-qemu-img is only 125K?
I would assume it's just the module that works on image files. AFAIK, you
don't need qemu if you have KVM. The same way you don't need KVM if you
use Xen ...
Kai
--
Kai
Sam Acosta wrote on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:06:42 +0800:
But how could I reload the grub config file after boot.
You can't.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing
Markus Falb wrote on Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:37:44 +0100:
Yes, but 5!=5.4
wrong.
I have machines with 5.3 and machines with 5.4 and therefore I need a
local mirror for 5.3
Why do you think did I post it? Read it!
http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=34
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl,
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:37:18 +:
Yes, I do that too.
Then, how are these not in date order? It might help you'd explain the
purpose.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:45:35 +:
Because within apache, you can't necessarily guarantees strict
chronological order of log entries. If, for example, php takes a
couple of seconds to run, the request could come a couple of seconds
before the log entry is written
James B. Byrne wrote on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:44:36 -0500 (EST):
Install qemu.
SELinux denied access requested by qemu-system-x86.
I'm not running KVM (but Xen). From the snippets above I deduce:
- qemu is not part of CentOS, you probably got it from rpmforge.
- that means you do not need qemu
Nice concept certainly
You have definitely *not* understood the concept *at all*.
Trying reading that FAQ again!
again: 5.4 != 5.3
*Can* you read? Nobody wrote that 5.4 == 5.3.
If you want to stay on 5.3, then simply don't do updates anymore.
5=current
5.0=5.0
5.3=5.3
5.4=5.4
Ryan Ivey wrote on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:47:01 -0500:
The file rotates correctly if I manually force it, however my logs won't
update until I restart syslogd. In other words, the new /var/log/maillog
isn't created after the logrotate. I have to manually restart syslogd and
manually touch
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:25:06 -0700 (MST):
Or maybe cpan install Net::Server will work
But he shouldn't use it if he can avoid!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
James B. Byrne wrote on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:48:50 -0500 (EST):
I am afraid I am not seeing the logic behind this sort of install
cockup. If qemu is not supposed to be used at all then why is it
even available
because you enabled rpmforge and installed qemu. *You* did that, not CentOS. I
James B. Byrne wrote on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:30:21 -0500 (EST):
Odd then, do you not think, that when I install virt-manager yum
requires qemu from the extras repository and does not require
kvm-qemu-img.
Yes. It doesn't require any of them for me. Have you tried cleaning your
metadata?
Kai
Markus Falb wrote on Sun, 8 Nov 2009 18:20:14 + (UTC):
In my Experience it is not always possible to upgrade all machines to the
newest and shiniest OS out there. Not within the first week at least. So
I have to maintain machines with 5.3 and machines with 5.4 and ...
My argument is
Monte Milanuk wrote on Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:13:17 -0800:
In practical terms, it may all be a moot point. I'm not too sure how
much more I can jam in that mini-tower case without other problems, and
(hopefully) 500GB should be enough storage for now; intended usage is
just backing up users
Scot P. Floess wrote on Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:46:35 -0500 (EST):
OK - I'll look through the list and see if I can find the discussion :)
I think you actually found it already. It's on the xen list and not on
centos-virt, sorry. But you will find a related thread about problems with
xenbr0 on
Rod Rook wrote on Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:55:52 -0500:
The problem mentioned in the thread you referred to is usually caused by
Network Manager, which has nothing to do with boot.log.
You may want to elaborate what your *problem* really is. And please trim
your answers, thanks.
Kai
--
Kai
Bowie Bailey wrote on Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:18:16 -0400:
The destination address is the private IP of the server. These
seem to be related to outgoing email connections based on the source
IPs
Is 195.140.240.6 the public IP of that machine? Why do you obfuscate a
private IP number? Do you
Michael Kress wrote on Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:50:33 +0200:
I don't know what's going on - it seems that testsaslauthd doesn't
lookup the user 'testomat' in /etc/sasldb2
Should it really do that with auth-mech=shadow?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet
Michael Kress wrote on Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:13:34 +0200 (CEST):
oh, I forgot to mention - of course I already tried that one:
saslauthd -d -a pam -O /usr/lib64/sasl2/smtpd.conf -r -l
I may be wrong, but I would think that this still won't work. If you use
pam or shadow saslauth should use
Michael Kress wrote on Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:07:44 +0200 (CEST):
The purpose for using /etc/sasldb2 is to use SMTP AUTH.
I know (that's always the purpose), but it wasn't clear if you *have* to
use the sasldb2. As I said you can't use authentication schemes against
system accounts if you want
Johnny Hughes wrote on Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:42:58 -0500:
However, you will also need to edit /etc/fstab and /boot/grub/grub.conf
if the disk configurations are different.
or update before the sync and then leave out /boot as well.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at
Michael Kress wrote on Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:07:44 +0200 (CEST):
The purpose for using /etc/sasldb2 is to use SMTP AUTH.
I know (that's always the purpose), but it wasn't clear if you *have* to
use the sasldb2. As I said you can't use authentication schemes against
system accounts if you want
Johnny Hughes wrote on Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:42:58 -0500:
However, you will also need to edit /etc/fstab and /boot/grub/grub.conf
if the disk configurations are different.
or update before the sync and then leave out /boot as well.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at
Jerry Geis wrote on Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:23:31 -0400:
Was just trying to find a way so that users that dont know what this
box is
that is poping up wont even see the box. Sounds like there is no way
around it - to just use https
encryption.
As has been said in this thread and in other
Akemi Yagi wrote on Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:34:21 -0700:
Please run 'yum clean all'
Actually, yum clean metadata seems to be enough. I'm making it now a
habit to run it before an update.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
one time you talk about applications, one time about web site. It's also
not clear what you actually want to achieve. So, what is the exact
question/problem?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Ray Leventhal wrote on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:29:09 -0400:
Should Mailscanner's threshold be addressed or is there something I'm
missing here?
The threshold is ok. What happened is that this message included phishing
text that clamd tripped on. You want to put *all* your servers on the
Gregory P. Ennis wrote on Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:39:21 -0500:
domain.com. IN TXT v=spf1 ip4:###.###.###.### a mx
include:alternatedomane.net ~all
He asked about DKIM.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Ray Van Dolson wrote on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:27:25 -0700:
Looks OK for me in IE8.
for me, too.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Dave wrote on Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:21:23 -0400:
Do i have to have a patched version of bind or compile it with an
option to turn on dkim?
I'm not very familiar with domain keys. But for TXT records you don't need
anything special. If domain keys uses only TXT records then the same
applies.
Ian Murray wrote on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:09:04 + (GMT):
[r...@xen ~]# virt-install -p
ERRORA name is required for the virtual machine.
Oh, my god. I just gave this extra parameter as I thought it would then ask for
the missing data. I forgot that you can either have interactive or
Oliver Ransom wrote on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:12:35 +0930:
As an additional question to the above, would forcing users to log in
with SSH keys rather than passwords avoid requiring any anti brute
force attack measures to be put in place?
Regarding SHH: yes. Nevertheless, you will want to
Bernhard Gschaider wrote on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:47:07 +0200:
- following the Wiki-Howto to the letter (especially using the
Xen-install-kernels)
Again, I think this is the wrong way to go, it's outdated. I've never done
it this way and I think this How-To is derived from very old Xen
Ian Murray wrote on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:21:33 + (GMT):
Actual, virt-install commmand line looks no less daunting to me.
What is daunting about virt-install -p?
I don't know if that is possible under virt-install.
Everything is possible, it depends on how deep you want to dig into it.
Eugene Vilensky wrote on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:14:58 -0500:
What is the best way to protect multiuser systems from brute force
attacks? I am setting up a relatively loose DenyHosts policy, but I
like the idea of locking an account for a time if too many attempts
are made, but to balance this
Bernhard Gschaider wrote on Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:56:36 +0200:
My question: am I doing something stupid? But I figured They're all
the same system, this must work
I don't want to play around with it too much as the server is also our
file-server and people start complaining.
So any hint
Bernhard Gschaider wrote on Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:52:52 +0200:
- I always installed as a paravirtualized machine, Could it be that
the install-kernel on the 5.3-media is not aware of this and somehow
manages to shot the host
I haven't done completely new xen setups on 5.3 yet, only on
Rudi Ahlers wrote on Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:05:34 +0200:
I'll see if I can convince the client to use an alternative method of
doing this.
- mailing list
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Dave wrote on Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:36:39 -0400:
How can i update just these specific packages
httpd* and php* without changing my priority options?
You have to exclude them from base and updates.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
Marcus Moeller wrote on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:24:39 +0200:
The only workaroud that is known to me atm is to disable the affected
kernel modules (which should be handled with care as some of them may
provide necessary functionality in your operating environment):
If vm.mmap_min_addr is 0 you
Ian Murray wrote on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:51:05 + (GMT):
I hit reply and changed the subject.
Please stop doing that.
That's what I do on my local
LUG list and nobody complained so, I don't know if I have committed
some list faux pas, so apologies if I have done.
It's wrong for every mail
Marcus Moeller wrote on Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:08:45 +0200:
Maybe these should just not comment on
a thread like this.
Yeah. And that's why I wrote very early on that this list isn't the right
place ;-) Just one comment that someone gets in the wrong throat and the
whole thread and purpose of
Please stop hijacking threads. If you want to ask a question, well, then
hit the button for new message. Thanks.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
Marcus Moeller wrote on Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:52:01 +0200:
Dear Community,
I think the community would benefit from opening a new mailing list for
these issues. There's already a promo list, but a discussion like this
doesn't really fit on it. I also think it doesn't fit here.
So, I think
Christoph Maser wrote on Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:18:26 +0200:
Looks like rpmforge has the same or a higher prio (lower number) than
base
maybe base has accidentally none.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Marcus Moeller wrote on Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:32:29 +0200:
I think that 'centos' is the correct list to address these issues as
it's the most commonly read list and where the 'community' lives.
Well, for the record: I'm not interested to read threads like this on
*this* list.
I have to agree
Patrick Flaherty wrote on Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:35:55 -0400:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^TRACE
RewriteRule .* - [F]
Or you could simply disallow it ... (among some other methods).
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:
Brett Serkez wrote on Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:43:28 -0400:
My understanding of the HWaddr is that the first portion is
manufacturer assigned for uniqueness, I cannot image this NIC
originally had this HWaddr, but I don't know what it originally was.
Indeed, AFAIK all hardware adapters start with
Sergey Smirnov wrote on Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:14:48 +0400:
This commonly happens when you using Xen in the bridged mode (when you
reboot your system the first time, this is default Xen configuration).
You have to change your configuration to routed mode if you want to
prevent that in future.
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:56:22 + (UTC):
Please refer to my thread excessive DNS slows httpd
Why don't you keep posting in there then?
Suggestions would be most welcome.
Foremost, you want to find out why those queries are generated despite the
fact that
Johan Swensson wrote on Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:28:32 +0200 (CEST):
I was wondering, what is the state on getting a more updated version of KVM
onto centos?
I've found some 3rd party repos by I'm curious if one could expect
a new supported KVM soon or will it not get in until EL6?
upstream
Madunix wrote on Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:41:29 +0200:
I have the following issues on a website, would like to know how would
you resolve these issue?
Why? This questions is really not appropriate for this list. This list
tolerates off-topic questions, up to a limit, I consider this question way
Muhammad panji wrote on Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:48:29 +0700:
I got weird permission on one of my server, when I ls -l the / i got
permission for all directory set to drwxr-xr-x. there are dot after
the executable permission for others. what dot mean in permission and
how to fix it?
I have never
301 - 400 of 1148 matches
Mail list logo