On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:01 -0700, Mike wrote:
> < !include auth-system.conf.ext
This helped. I enabled pam for passdb and now my GSSAPI auth works, but
I don't understand why. I also had to enable "allow_all_users=yes"
otherwise the messages weren't delivered.
I'm going to have to take this to
On 2015-09-09 14:21, Mike wrote:
Yep, I have it working. It's been almost 6 months since I set it up so
don't recall many details other than it was NOT trivial :). Have only
used alpine and thunderbird clients, both work fine.
I wonder if that means Evolution is broken. In any case, could you
On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 13:53 -0700, Alice Wonder wrote:
> You could try rebuilding this src.rpm -
>
> http://awel.domblogger.net/7/libre/src/repoview/dovecot.html
>
> That's what I use for Dovecot on CentOS 7 but I build it against
> LibreSSL so you probably don't want my binary RPM but the
Hi Everyone,
I'm running an IPA server on CentOS 7 successfully and now I want to
change my Dovecot setup to use GSSAPI for IMAP authentication instead
of a flat "userdb" file. I've already joined the Dovecot box to the IPA
domain - ssh and ipa policies and all that are working properly.
I read
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 16:16 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> jailed in a docker is safe to install,
Cool, but it doesn't really answer my question. :P
--
Kanwar R.S. Sandhu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi Everyone,
Years ago the recommended way to install Sun's java was to install from
the tar.gz file because the RPM they supplied did some bad things
(clobbered other files or something...can't remember the details). Is
this still the case with Oracle's java RPM, or is it now safe to
install?
Hi Everyone,
Since Satellite 6 is an amalgam of other F/OSS projects and is no longer
solely based on Spacewalk, is a new upstream project for Satellite 6
going to be created? BEtter yet, is a new upstream project already
available?
Ranbir
--
Kanwar R.S. Sandhu
On 2015-07-22 13:34, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
The upstream project is called Katello, http://www.katello.org/
It has nothing to do with Spacewalk as far as I can tell.
Katello is just one piece. Satellite 6 also integrates Candlepin, Puppet
and more. What I'm wondering is if the entire set of
On 2015-07-22 14:53, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
The Katello project is the whole thing. During installation it pulls in
Foreman, Candlepin, Pulp, Puppet and more.
Really? I couldn't tell based on the Katello project site.
Thanks for the info. I'm going to give Katello a spin at home.
--
Kanwar
On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 19:22 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
I am glad it worked.
Sounds to me like Windows being Windows. SOF (Son-of-Frankenstein
or Windows Nein, oops, Windows 10) is terrible quality. If it
works right in your other VM's, then it is SOF's doing.
The newest update (10162)
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 22:10 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Did it work?
Yes, this time around the install worked. Thing is, the sha1sum was the
same as the first time I downloaded the ISO so there was no corruption
to speak of. I really don't know why it wasn't working before.
I haven't done much
Hi Everyone,
Has anyone managed to install Windows 10 tech preview build 10130 as a
KVM on a CentOS 6 host? I'm having problems that I haven't been able to
get past.
I can get the CD to boot and the install process to begin, but Windows
keeps complaining about missing drivers. I've
Ranbir Sandhu
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
does not start and the 169.254.x.x IP doesn't get added to the
interface.
It's not hard to do after the fact, but putting simple things like that
in a kickstart file prevents one from doing all the mundane, mind
numbing sys admin tasks. :)
HTH,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 19:02 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Am 24.12.2012 00:03, schrieb Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu:
I switched to Roundcube early on it's life and haven't looked back. The
newest release sure is purrrty!! It's worlds better than Squirrelmail.
Interesting. Last time I looked
sure is purrrty!! It's worlds better than Squirrelmail.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 3.6.6-1.fc17.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
18:01:05 up 16 days, 17:58, 8 users, load average: 0.17, 0.31, 0.37
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
the list. But, for some reason or another I didn't
actually give it a go.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 3.5.4-2.fc17.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
21:17:45 up 18 days, 9:34, 3 users, load average: 0.08, 0.05, 0.08
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
Start End Blocks Id System
Command (m for help): quit
So...how do I properly assign this eSATA disk to the KVM? FYI: the
enclosure can use USB as well.
Thanks,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 3.5.4-2.fc17.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
12:20:20 up 12 days, 37 min, 3 users
Hi Everyone,
How do I change the console resolution of CentOS 6 KVMs to be 1024x768
or more?
I have the spice server and qxl card selected for the KVM. I assumed it
would be enough to put the text console into high res, but I was
wrong. :/
Regards,
Ranbir
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 10:52 -0400, Nicolas Ross wrote:
did you try running authconfig --enablemkhomedir --updateall
Great, that worked !
That options isn't even in the man page !
That's a bug then. Please report it!
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 3.5.2-3.fc17.x86_64
? What would you guys do?
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
CentOS
install for your KVMs would give you essentially the same thing.
If there was a similar bare metal install option like RHEV-H through
CentOS, I could see going that route for my deployments eventually.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 3.3.7-1.fc17.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 12:39 +0200, C. L. Martinez wrote:
Somebody knows how can I do this??
This is a really late reply: you should join the rsyslog mail list -
you'll get lots of help there.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 3.3.5-2.fc16.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
12:27:33 up 1
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 13:08 -0700, Nataraj wrote:
Furthermore RedHat has decided that they don't like
Upstart and they are going to yet another replacement for upstart in
future releases (sorry, I don't remember the name of it).
You're thinking about systemd.
I believe Fedora 15 was the first
15' /devnull.
will figure it out.
Add postgrey to your setup. Your spam should drop to nothing (well, so
near to nothing it makes no difference).
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 3.2.9-2.fc16.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
08:10:36 up 23:16, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.05
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 05:57 +0200, Udo Siewert wrote:
A shot in the dark: my DVD image burned by K3B won't also boot. Using
Brasero and all was fine. Not reproducable, but worth the attempt.
I used Brasero: failed to boot.
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 22:17 -0600, Devin Reade wrote:
My successful burns (although not tried with CentOS 6 yet) have been
using growisofs directly:
growisofs -speed=1 -dvd-compat -Z /dev/dvd=image.iso
Tried this: failed to boot.
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175
follows the drive or the machine?
I used a different burner in a different PC running Fedora 15: failed to
boot.
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
09:36:17 up 9:25, 1 user, load average: 0.19, 0.14, 0.10
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 09:32 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
ETCDisolinux: Found something at drive = EF
No DEFAULT or UI configuration directive found!
boot:
The same disc works fine in my 4 year old HP laptop, and when installing
CentOS 6 as a KVM.
I've tried everything people have so
then?
I already tried that: it won't boot. :(
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
12:12:23 up 12:01, 1 user, load average: 0.44, 0.10, 0.03
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
the CentOS problem.
I'll still try it. It's worth a shot.
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
12:15:29 up 12:04, 1 user, load average: 0.29, 0.16, 0.06
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
15
behave differently.
Thanks to everyone that tried to help out. I appreciate everyone's
efforts.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
12:18:37 up 12:07, 1 user, load average: 0.24, 0.16, 0.08
.
Does anyone know what's going on? I've never seen this problem before.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
09:21:53 up 10:20, 2 users, load average: 1.20, 1.47, 1.34
___
CentOS mailing list
.
The drive in my little server is a DVD/CD burner, too. So, that's not
the problem.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
22:23:20 up 23:22, 4 users, load average: 0.24, 0.12, 0.04
___
CentOS mailing list
drive. :/ However, I have
used it to burn LinuxMCE DVD images, and those have always booted on my
new machine without issue.
I think it's something specific to CentOS 6 and the particular hardware
I'm using.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU
to burn the DVD image. I changed the speed to
1x, but K3B reported the burn speed as 2.4x - I guess it couldn't go any
lower.
The newly burnt image didn't boot either. The error was the same.
So sad. :(
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
23
(though I'm a Red Hat and Red Hat based guy), but Ubuntu? Forget
it!
I hope you find it as stable and reliable as CentOS.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
06:47:45 up 23:59, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.35, 0.26
# virsh define guest.xml
Done.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
21:41:35 up 4 days, 20:21, 2 users, load average: 0.08, 0.21, 0.16
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
21:15:40 up 1 day, 19:55, 2 users, load average: 0.02, 0.02, 0.05
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
and restore from the images.
That's an excellent idea! I didn't consider it when I was trying to
figure out how to migrate a physical CentOS 5 server to a KVM.
I will try this just for shits and giggles.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
21:37
.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
15:39:12 up 9 days, 21:23, 3 users, load average: 0.03, 0.07, 0.02
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Cluster Suite for the storage and KVM clustering
bits).
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.32.23-170.fc12.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
07:08:09 up 11 days, 22:13, 6 users, load average: 0.08, 0.26, 0.20
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 09:31 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
If you are starting from scratch and don't know your way around the
linux system, why not use one of the 'appliance' style distributions
like ClearOS (fairly new) or SMEserver (older but still works)? These
are based on CentOS code but
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 12:28 -0400, Tait Clarridge wrote:
I am having trouble simulating a network cable disconnect with KVM. I
would like to test active backup bonding for a switch IOS upgrade in a
production environment.
Couldn't you just do a ifdown ethX in the KVM itself? One of the
bonded
On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 15:54 +0100, Niki Kovacs wrote:
I'd like to handle the two PCs from the medical office remotely with
FreeNX. I figured that the best way to distinguish them would be to
assign a different port for SSH to each of them, and then redirect each
of the ports respectively.
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 10:10 -0800, jd wrote:
Hi
We are very pleased to introduce ConVirt 2.0 – the next major step
up in open source virtualization management. The ConVirt 2.0
generation combines a flexible, open architecture, the highest level
of management capabilities, and the
it several times, it is not that hard and you get the
most recent version.
Fair enough, but the kmod-kvm rpms in the extras repo are for ancient
kernels. There hasn't been a new package since Oct. 2008.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU
Hi All,
Does anyone know of a repo packaging a recent pulse audio release as
RPMs for CentOS 5?
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
11:26:10 up 8 days, 12:22, 5 users, load average: 1.09, 0.35, 0.18
? Is installing
the older kernel my only option?
BTW, I'd post this on the virt-list, but I have a hard time getting
answers on that list.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
14:44:30 up 8 days, 15:41, 5 users, load average: 0.56, 0.22, 0.21
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 11:36 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
I've tried change
an existing VM to virtio for disk and network, but each time I start it,
I get this error:
error: Failed to start domain popdns02
error: internal error unsupported disk type 'vda'
I don't know why
: internal error unsupported disk type 'vda'
I don't know why this is happening. From what I've read, virtio should
be available. Can someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong?
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
11:32:58 up 6 days
(lfarkas)
I can't find that package anywhere in that repo. So, where do I get it
from?
BTW, I would have asked this on the CentOS virt list, but that list is
really quiet.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
21:14:54 up 1 day, 22:11, 2
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 21:17 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
I can't find that package anywhere in that repo. So, where do I get it
from?
Forget I asked: I'll just grab it from the CentOS base repo.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU
Hi All,
Can I use virt-manager from a Fedora 11 box to manage Qemu/KVM VMs, or
is this crazy (re: incompatible)?
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
21:36:22 up 4 days, 20:37, 4 users, load average: 0.22, 0.20, 0.18
.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
23:53:03 up 12 days, 15:19, 3 users, load average: 0.34, 0.27, 0.18
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
a try.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
11:27:48 up 6 days, 2:54, 4 users, load average: 1.40, 1.28, 1.29
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
it for and seems to be finally stable:
kmod-kvm-2.6.30.1-2.el5
qemu-*-0.10.5-2.el5
I don't see a libvirt package. Should I just use the one from the
extras repo?
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
12:24:46 up 6 days, 3:51, 4 users, load average
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 18:56 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
see around (it's there since 06.28):
http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/x86_64/virt/RPMS/libvirt-0.6.4-2.el5.x86_64.rpm
Wow, I'm blind. Thanks.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64
replacing it, even though I've excluded the
package. I've tried cleaning the yum cache and a few other trouble
shooting steps, all to no avail.
I'll have to install libvirt locally.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
14:41:50 up 6 days, 6
).
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
17:55:54 up 5 days, 9:22, 5 users, load average: 1.13, 0.47, 0.28
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 18:06 -0400, Kwan Lowe wrote:
I don't think kvm is available upstream until 5.4.
I figured that out about 5 minutes after sending the email. Just great.
Anyone know when 5.4 is hitting?
Thanks for the reply!
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.25
stable is it?
2. Any idea if moving from this testing version to the eventual official
release in CentOS 5.4 will present any problems? (I suspect not)
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
21:49:02 up 5 days, 13:15, 4 users, load average
.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
10:16:18 up 1 day, 16:47, 4 users, load average: 1.37, 1.16, 1.22
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
want to stay away, try Gandi - www.gandi.net
I use gandi.net for my .com domains. Me likey!
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
10:36:40 up 1 day, 17:07, 4 users, load average: 0.27, 0.30, 0.52
.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
09:52:40 up 9 days, 19:26, 5 users, load average: 1.61, 1.35, 1.23
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
wouldn't be found?
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
15:22:34 up 2 days, 16:33, 4 users, load average: 1.11, 1.06, 0.67
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 15:23 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
Does anyone know why librelp-devel wouldn't be found?
Well, shit, I figured it out. librelp-devel is in epel, not in the
CentOS repos. So, after adding the epel repo to the mock config for
centos-5-x86_64 and centos-5-i386
that all work just fine.
I can take this to the rsyslog list if need be. I wanted to try here
first.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
13:46:04 up 1 day, 14:56, 4 users, load average: 1.03, 0.41, 0.14
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:59 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
Hello All,
Does the rsyslog version in CentOS 5 support expression based filters?
I'm asking because a filter I believe should be working, isn't and I
cannot figure out why.
I think this is the likely problem: the CentOS version
either a deeper problem (e.g. network issue), or simply that
you've specified the wrong server to use for checking passwords against.
BTW, I still don't know why you have two kdc entries in your krb5.conf
file. You only need one.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.19
is going to be critical.
So, should I rebuild the F10 rpm, or should I just stick with the
version in CentOS 5? Based on what I'm reading, moving to a newer
release would be wise.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
11:37:20 up 19 days
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 08:44 -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
What about branching Fedora freeradius for EPEL?
I guess I can I make a package request there (I already checked - they
don't have it).
Are people really deploying freeradius-1.1.3??
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10
, if need be.
I suppose my real concern is if our soon-to-arrive network gear requires
features included only in the 2.0 and up releases.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
12:00:42 up 19 days, 11:26, 4 users, load average: 0.72, 0.32
there's a particular way packages need to be built for
inclusion into centosplus. Where be the info? :)
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
12:13:53 up 19 days, 11:40, 4 users, load average: 0.14, 0.23, 0.18
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
14:06:36 up 19 days, 13:32, 4 users, load average: 0.14, 0.20, 0.18
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
and releases unless there's a security issue.
I'd be doing it for the community, not just myself. It would help
everyone out. Besides, what comes around, goes around.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
14:24:09 up 19 days, 13:50, 4
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
15:26:31 up 7 days, 14:53, 5 users, load average: 0.79, 0.32, 0.16
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
might be if part of your
file- system are read-only because you booted the box via PXE.
You could make a RPM pretty easy for it.
I was kind of hoping not having to go down that route...you know,
laziness and all. :)
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10
the Firefox settings. I doubt I would
have remembered they were there.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
14:04:07 up 6 days, 15:51, 4 users, load average: 0.92, 1.02, 0.69
___
CentOS mailing
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 14:07 -0500, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 20:36 -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
In Firefox go to your about:config page and scroll down to:
network.negotiate-auth.delegation-uris
and
network.negotiate-auth.trusted-uris
,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
14:58:02 up 6 days, 16:45, 4 users, load average: 1.32, 1.27, 1.21
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
17:50:59 up 5 days, 19:38, 3 users, load average: 2.08, 1.78, 0.98
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
17:54:53 up 5 days, 19:41, 3 users, load average: 1.20, 1.70, 1.14
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
17:57:09 up 5 days, 19:44, 3 users, load average: 0.21, 1.13, 1.00
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
in.
What's the difference between kerberos auth and winbind auth?
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
19:32:30 up 5 days, 21:19, 3 users, load average: 0.30, 0.24, 0.21
___
CentOS mailing list
to know Apache inside and out, but good
grasp of how to configure apache is a plus.
2. make sure your Windows ADS is configured properly. If there's
anything that will throw off your project, it's the Windows server.
Your Windows admin better know his stuff!
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir
need any tips/help, let me know. I have lots of CentOS servers
and a couple of Fedora and Ubuntu laptops authenticating to AD at work,
and they all work flawlessly.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.7-53.fc9.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
10:17:32 up 6 days, 14:46, 13 users, load
the AD to test AD auth. That is, you want
to be sure your linux side is configured properly to get a kerberos
ticket in the first place. If you're able to get one, you should be to
join the domain.
HTH,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.27.7-53.fc9.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
21:46:24 up 6
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 16:38 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Has anyone built a freenx 7.3 for Centos 5? I'd like to be able to use
the session shadow mode on some machines.
Oh neat! When did this get added to freenx? I've been wanted to test
that out for a long time.
Regards,
Ranbir
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 21:01 +0200, Kay Diederichs wrote:
Fact is that with CentOS-5 kernels (but not with CentOS-4, as this
functionality became available in kernel 2.6.17) you could (or rather
_should_ regularly)
echo check /sys/block/mdX/md/sync_action
to check agreement between the
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 12:09 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote:
cat /proc/mdstat gives progress
cat /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action gives current mode
Of course! I guess when I ran the check on md0, it finished before I
had the opportunity to watch the progress, so I wasn't sure what to
check.
Also, I
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 05:32 -0400, Jim Wildman wrote:
Have not tried it, but I snipped this for future use.
FAN Fully Automated Nagios (based on CentOS)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fannagioscd
Oh wow - I haven't heard of this project. It looks sweeet.
The CentOS 5 + nagios +
to move up to Fedora 10 or CentOS 6.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux
10:30:46 up 20 days, 11:40, 1 user, load average: 0.77, 0.79, 0.72
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
figure.
FYI: I use CentOS 5 for all my server stuff, and even for desktop
machines. But, I just don't want it as my main desktop distribution. :)
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux
11:04:42 up 20 days, 12:14, 1 user, load average: 2.35, 1.58, 1.04
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 07:41 -0700, nate wrote:
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
Hi All,
The subject says it all. I'm asking because I've found Fedora 9 to be
It will be based on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.
CentOS is based on RHEL, RHEL is based on Fedora: hence, my question...
Regards
. :)
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux
16:47:03 up 20 days, 17:56, 1 user, load average: 0.20, 0.42, 0.72
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
option.
Having said that, I'm going to stick with RoundCube. If SquirrelMail
ever gets a total interface overhaul, I'll most likely go back to it.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux
21:30:46 up 31 days, 15:26, 2 users, load average: 0.62, 0.54, 0.46
source for this, though. So
far I haven't found it.
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux
22:25:36 up 9 days, 16:23, 2 users, load average: 0.29, 0.27, 0.27
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
a night, most of the time (instead of
the 8 I really need).
Regards,
Ranbir
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux
21:01:58 up 14 days, 43 min, 1 user, load average: 1.04, 0.96, 0.91
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
--
Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu
Linux 2.6.22.14-72.fc6 i686 GNU/Linux
21:08:42 up 10 days, 50 min, 2 users, load average: 0.58, 0.34, 0.20
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo