point though.
Thats the one thing that the garmin apps do really well. As a
workaround, I've used viamichelin to good effect ( and wikiloc ); and
all the tools and bits you need to track and refactor on the road, come
together really well on CentOS.
HTH
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 |
do your own benchmarks for
interfaces and components eg. pci bus etc.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://li
ublished, since in many
cases as is with CentOS, people are talking about problems and potential
solutions to internet facing infra / production services etc
regards
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key :
On 12/04/17 13:23, Andrew Holway wrote:
>
> Thoughts? Experiances?
>
been talking with the mattermost people to get an instance up in
centos.org space - more open source, more privacy and better terms of
service.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.co
On 09/04/17 05:39, Anthony K wrote:
> So, at which stage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd? Are you
> still ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to it?
I think the points been made, can we all move along and let this thread be.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0
iling list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
1.4.1 is available now
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-20
someone could please correct these inconsistencies it would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jared Baker
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
let me see if we can get this fixed and c
hi everyone,
just a quick reminder that we only have a few more places available at
the CentOS Dojo next week Friday :
https://wiki.centos.org/Events/Dojo/Brussels2017
If you are in the area, or able to make it into the area, do come by.
regards
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http
> /dev/lvm/vm-disk for example.
for the sake of size, lots of people prefer to download the qcow2c image
( note the compressed flag ), and qemu-img convert on their own end. Is
that an option for your usecase ?
>
> Official wiki link is broken regardless.
will try and get that fix
e there is no way to login to the images without
exporting the metadata externally to setup passwords and keys etc.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
e able to run a rss feed locally for content going into the
repo, it might need a bit of work to map back to the announcement emails
though.
what is the real workflow you are looking at for this ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http:
is available we will
work through the build machanics and take it from there.
regards
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
Cen
centos.org and point me at it ( ideally assign the issue to me ), I
can work out the required bits.
What sort of info would you expect to see in this beyond
- filename
- date of last upates
- centos ver
- arch
- file format
- sha256um
regards
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.kar
this point what that
might be ?
regards
- --
Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAg
I suspect a large
part of that is just going to be time in day.
> Have you, as the CentOS project lead ever asked RedHat if they can
> make their version of Chromium for CentOS 6 available for us? If
> not, can you please?
I havent, but am more than willing to take the question up.
r
why we can't get a working, up
> to date, and therefore secure version of chromium running on CentOS
> 6.7!!
Happy to host it, is this something you are working on at the moment
Matthew ?
Regards,
- --
Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.or
On 02/04/16 17:07, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 11:25 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday February 24th, at 6pm UTC time, the DC hosting some of
>> the CentOS equipments used for various roles had suffered from
>> multiple electricity
On 22/03/16 01:06, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> On 21 March 2016 at 11:51, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> On 21/03/16 14:34, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
>>> What is the point to pack single raw file into the tar.gz and to name it
>> raw ?
>>> Or it's just a mistake
which will itself only
have a .raw file compressed inside it )
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org
> environment I am comfortable in.
>
> Can anybody comment here on the best way to run RHEL/Fedora/CentOS on a
> RasPi,
> or if there's even a useful port?
https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/Arm32/RaspberryPi3
Just put that up, the baseline stuff a
rch/Arm32 for more info
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ss build as well for the altarch distro's.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
m, with every major vendor
in the ARM 64bit platform working with us. We say the rpi3 release this
morning and are going to work on a bringup to match our rpi2 images.
However, we will also be doing a 64bit image, based on CentOS Linux
7/aarch64 release
regards
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389
xternal power source. If I'm at the work table
and plugged in, run with throughput-performance mode, and if the
external power is disconnected, run in powersave mode ? I've had,
admittedly a brief, look and found nothing obvious. Has anyone else run
into this before ?
Regards
--
Karanbir
e initial bootstrap,
and should have it done soon - I would recommend dropping into the next
SCL SIG meeting ( they are held on IRC in #centos-devel on
irc.freenode.net at 16:00 UTC on alternate Wednesdays ).
https://www.centos.org/community/calendar/#Software_Collections_SIG_Sync-up
regards
--
due to RF-kill
>
> Any idea what is wrong??
your laptop has a switch to turn on/ turn off the wifi - and its
currently turned off. this might be a real switch, or a key combination.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http:
specs for epel and others, they might help too.
>>
>> use one of the actual mirrors.
>> http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/
>
> Nope. No go.
Switch to the VC's and see what the error message is in the logs. do you
have networking setup at this point ?
ntos.org in the near future.
what I would recommend, is to open an issue report at bugs.centos.org/
to track this as a task.
As a related subject, we do push the main key fingerprints via https at
www.centos.org/keys
regards
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.or
shows with 0 bytes.
>
> Anyone else seen this behavior?
this might be down to when anaconda does its disk scan, and when the
parts were created by hand. Ideally, just use anaconda to do the same
thing and you should be fine.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ |
ving said this, what exactly is the issue you are facing ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Ymm telling you how far adrift you
are... in workloads where there is no real update in place ( think
cloud, container, atomic etc ), its the only reference you get to a
single package set.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://ww
On 07/12/15 16:17, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>
> IRC is not a good choice for communicating with IT admins in a large
> enterprise environment. It is usually blocked.
>
Does google hangout work ? we might be able to also setup a phone dial
in setup
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-09
is.
We are still a small team, and all efforts are flat out on getting the
iso media and images done, out of the door - but as soon as I have this
done, I'll look at hosting some google hangouts, irc sessions and maybe
a longer email thread as well to lay out the numbering proposition.
--
power7 and 8 ( both BE and LE ) are pretty close as well
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mail
t we've
struggled to keep the site updated and relevant, whereas the wiki with
its much larger user base and contributor base has far better churn.
So lets workout what the tangible issues are, and then work on resolving
those.
I will end by saying that we have more than a few million monthly
nt discussion in
> centos-devel?
i dont see it being dropped, on my completely updated machine i still
see the fully qualified numbering in /etc/centos-release ( as an example ) ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | tw
way ).
thanks
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
check there is enough diskspace for the initrd to
be built and hosted in the right place..
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
C
#x27; there is a CentOS release ver to RHEL release ver mapping, to
indicate which version of the RHEL sources a specific CentOS build is
derived from.
7(1503) : RHEL 7.1
7(1406) : RHEL 7.0
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www
unctionality in the new release. In the coming weeks, I will try
and visit some of these via blog posts, videos etc. If anything specific
pop's up, let me know.
regards
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
Gn
entOS group in India at
http://www.meetup.com/CentOS-India/ and another group for the
Netherlands at http://www.meetup.com/CentOS-Netherlands/
Regards and hope to see you at one of these meetups soon,
--
Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.cento
to 2.7.10?
>
> thanks,
There are a few SCL's ready for release - you should see them come
through in the coming week. This includes : py27 / py33 and py34; for
py27 this would be to 2.7.8
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsi
On 03/11/15 05:06, Ramaseshan S wrote:
> Sorry didnt know that
> Here is an attached online link.
>
> http://tinypic.com/r/33pdcw6/9
>
just so i understand this - why are you trying to hide the fact that
this is CentOS you are running there ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207
On 17/10/15 18:48, Jo Rhett wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Karanbir Singh <mailto:mail-li...@karan.org>> wrote:
>>> On 22/09/15 22:37, Jo Rhett wrote:
>>>> Is there any chance we could get a PV AMI for CentOS 7 to match the HVM
>>>> version a
On 23/09/15 19:58, Jo Rhett wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2015, at 9:03 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 22/09/15 22:37, Jo Rhett wrote:
>>> Is there any chance we could get a PV AMI for CentOS 7 to match the HVM
>>> version at
>>> https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/
have a go at this, but there hasent been a huge
request for the pv ami's; also when we tried this back in the early
centos7 days, there were a string of issues.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
__
ontent and the checks reported therein - we do no CVE validation in
CentOS Buildsystems.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
Ce
On 30/07/15 00:20, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 07/29/2015 04:53 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> the biggest blocker to going GA on the x86 build is the kernel; the
>> distro kernel we end up with isnt going to be the same as the upstream
>> x86_64 kernel configs. However, there has
e ) around those builds. So if you
are using it, or are interested in using it - do take the distro out for
a spin and let us know!
Regards,
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
_
el
free to drop in. Office hours are run as a open house, free question and
answer sessions.
regards,
--
Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/pub
On 21/07/15 12:42, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> hi
>
> Up for grabs, a few packs of CentOS stickers ( but only to the EU )
>
These are all gone now, I've actually had quite a few more than 20
people write in within a few hours. Will try and do something and get a
packet out to e
CentOS sticker
Want one ? email me at kbsi...@centos.org and give me your address, I'll
aim to have these out by the weekend.
Regards,
--
Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS
GnuPG Key : http
On 12/06/15 14:09, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Its been a while since I did the last update post - so this one is going
>> to be a bit longer.
>>
>
> I'd like to let you know that the updates are appreciated. I thin
tall service that allows
you to install any CentOS version / release very easily ? check it out
at http://boot.centos.org/ and read the info page at
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RemoteiPXE
Regards,
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key :
https
certs on machines that other people can get hands-on easily.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
. They will be working on things ranging
from Kpatch live patching, to Xen and Cloud installs, to improving our
documentation trails! I'm very excited to have these students onboard!
Hope they have a great summer ahead and produce some great code.
Regards,
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 |
with a few notes from
various places. Any and all help is appreciated. You can send me news to
post in this at kbsingh _ centos.org.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
ox.
I know that CentOS-6 works fine, out of the box, on the precision
m4800's if you want to Dell.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
stgresql etc ( and we welcome others a well).
Now if you look at the SIGs coming up and delivering content - it should
again be pretty clear what sort of content we are facilitating here.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org
his list for
people to get completely carried away and lose the ability to have a
meaningful conversation.
appreciate it,
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
mcore, but the debuginfo for kernel
> 3.10.0-229.1.2.el7.x86_64 I can't find. Found and installed for kernel
> 3.10.0-123.13.2.el7.x86_64 but that doesn't help me troubleshoot the
> -229.1.2 kernel.
debuginfo's should be on their way, I know Johnny was working on tha
ght need to spread the net
wide to find a reasonable representation.
thoughts ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:
>
> 231 2735 2746 3458 5216 ...
I believe your argument works fine since:
CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1503.iso
CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1507.iso
CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1512.iso
CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1606.iso
note, this is YYmm to indicate age, and not serial numbers.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | ht
of where and how it was privisioned should give you the same
functional package set. This is an important thing.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
in
the content being delivered. We are only opening up options to line up
various media and point-in-time images.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS
> "el_6". Any reason for this discrepancy?
could you please file this as a bug report at bugs.centos.org
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
try and strip out the EULA acceptance bits
from the code and request Johnny to issue an update for this.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
.12-21.el7_1.x86_64
> file /usr/bin/smbcontrol conflicts between attempted installs of
> samba-common-0:4.1.12-21.el7_1.i686 and
> samba-common-0:4.1.12-21.el7_1.x86_64
> file /usr/bin/testparm conflicts between attempted installs of
> samba-common-0:4.1.12-21.el7_1.i686 and
>
ide for an easy upstream vendor
> version reference?
does /etc/centos-release-upstream provide you with that ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mai
he important thing is that we all know ( where 'we' is
the community at large, the consumers and the SIGs ) all have a frame of
reference that maps to the same target; different people have different
goal posts - and if your's involves a 7.1, please use it.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-2
ing special to get it to clean update ? yum update isn't offering
> me anything newer and centos-release still says its 1406
>
>
>
is it possible that the mirror you are hitting isnt updated as yet ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/
on irc.freenode.net for folks who want to get
involved.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 13/02/15 18:45, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> So, what is the secondary MX server that you are describing that "accepts
> everything" is based on?
if you actually read the thread you are replying to blindly, you might
find out ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http
e list unwelcoming to new users, it also
dramatically drops the quality of conversation.
If moderating is the only way to restore sanity and keep things
productive for the folks bringing through conversations then so be it,
we will start putting individual accounts on moderation.
--
Karanbir Sing
a
handful of users. Its irrelevant, take it to an irrelevant venue.
> of 'Why doesn't this work"', or 'How do I fix this problem" that you
> would have if there were something fundamentally wrong with the disto.
By assuming that the mailing list is a bug report
t; redirects to http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/scl/x86_64/ which leads
> to 404, instead it should be
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/SCL/x86_64/
>
> Is this a change or bug.
its a bug, pinging folks who should be able to fix it - stuff like this
might be best reported via bu
his?
take a look at the "qemu-img convert" bits - you might be best off
converting the backing disk image to something better supported by
qemu-kvm ( which is what I guess you mean when you say qemu ).
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.c
]:/home/auser/repo
>
> Result: NFS is not mounted even the correct ip is set by passing ip=
> parameters.
>
> Of course I tested the NFS share using CentOS itself.
>
> Thanks for any assistance!
you dont need to include this repo in the installer, its already there
by d
gt;>
>>
>> Red Hat has permission to distribute, to paying customers, pieces of it
>> that are not open source. I need to get permission to strip parts of
>> that out and distribute the rest.
>>
>> I have asked for permission and am waiti
changes from the typical Dojo formats in that this
one is entirely driven by interactive and demo sessions, There are no
speaker / audience like timeslots. The aim is to ensure everyone
attending learns and gets hands on with the topic.
Its going to be a great day, see you there!
--
Karanbir Singh
+44
atibility or equivallencce ).
> An undocumented computer program differs only slightly from a video
> game. Both are filled with mysteries, puzzles, and unanswered questions.
Therefore, lets do the right thing - get the means together in community
to adapt those docs, brand them accordingly an
On 01/05/2015 04:37 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> 2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN we could
> properly publish that data in some way.
get it, then validate it, then we can push it as known correct.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitt
ced that EPEL has started to add
>> errata data to their repositories.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/li
notices and places where there is a red hat string
that implies this is code curated by/at/for Red Hat then thats fine to
leave in. eg: the gcc --version output states Red Hat, since this gcc
codebase is the one maintained upstream.
Finally, when in doubt, bring it up!
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-099
hat has been fixed (far) upstream.
>
or host the fix in the plus repos and let people decide which mailman
they want to use.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
On 14/11/14 18:09, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>
>>> So in practice I think this really boils down to the common problem of
>>> ancient software shipped by RHEL and the bug-for-bug compatibility in
>>> CentOS
of
> ancient software shipped by RHEL and the bug-for-bug compatibility in
> CentOS with the list system eating its own dog food. That is, there
> is a fix for mailman, but not in the CentOS version. Sometimes
> stability is good, sometimes you need the updates.
can
nally cheap off ebay.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
x audit.log entries that were preventing
kvm's ko to be loaded ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
, is to submit tests to
the t_functional suite :
https://git.centos.org/summary/?r=sig-core/t_functional.git
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentO
if its not on
bugs.centos.org, its unlikely to get any attention in a reasonable time
frame.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS maili
On 10/10/2014 03:16 PM, Mike Burger wrote:
> On 2014-10-10 10:07 am, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 10/10/2014 01:09 PM, Mike Burger wrote:
>>> All those in favor of unceremoniously dumping arsh...@gmail.com from the
>>> listserv, say aye.
>>>
>>
>>
On 10/10/2014 01:09 PM, Mike Burger wrote:
> All those in favor of unceremoniously dumping arsh...@gmail.com from the
> listserv, say aye.
>
rather than further promoting spam, as you are doing here - for list
moderation requests, contact the list owner address instead.
--
Karanbir
ted, and very well
established + respected in the peer group. Lets try and keep content to
the technical conversations, ideally CentOS relevant.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
_
hreats, or harassment of any individual or group. We reserve
the right to moderate or ban anyone who violates our guidelines without
notice or discussion.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
- --
Karanbir Singh, CentOS Project Leader
on behalf of the CentOS Project Board
-BEGIN PGP
ever got there.
>
>Would you mind posting this?
>
>For the list-owner, please figure out what happened.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>mark
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.
> send you a nice report about it. Does anyone know if upstream is working on a
> fix?
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147189 has conversation and
details that you might find interesting.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbs
likely
have some level of automation around this already
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/m
On 08/29/2014 09:52 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-announce/2014-August/30.html
>>
>>
>> EPEL-7 is now considered GA and available to all users.
>
> Huzzah! Thank
hi folks,
I know lots of people have been waiting for this :
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-announce/2014-August/30.html
EPEL-7 is now considered GA and available to all users.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http
1 - 100 of 1639 matches
Mail list logo
