[CentOS] Help -- LVM snapshot full -- how do I recover?

- 24.00G dom6_snapVolGroup02 swi-d- 1.00G dom6_data 100.00 Any help very much appreciated! Liam This is on a Dell 2950 with CentOS 5.0 running Xen -- Liam Kirsher PGP: http://liam.numenet.com/pgp

Re: [CentOS] Postfix+MySQL - how to create DB

n know you didn't know. -- Daniel J. Boorstin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Liam Kirsher PGP: http://liam.numenet.com/pgp/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Securing SSH

mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- Liam Kirsher PGP: http://liam.numenet.com/pgp/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] You can't get there from here -- SOLVED

ngs > -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_mynetworks,permit_sasl_authenticated,reject Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Miark wrote on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:55:32 -0500: > > >> The winning solution >> > > Nevertheless, Bowie's solution is the correct

Re: [CentOS] vsifax on Centos 5.1

ed in a vsifax installation. > > I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be > listening to this list and could give me a hand. > > Thanks much!!! > > Greg Ennis > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@c

Re: [CentOS] Trying to understand Remote desktops

; On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 15:31 -0700, Liam Kirsher wrote: > >> Well, that's concise. Thanks. >> >> Scott Moseman wrote: >> >>> On 8/22/07, Liam Kirsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> It looks like

Re: [CentOS] Trying to understand Remote desktops

Well, that's concise. Thanks. Scott Moseman wrote: > On 8/22/07, Liam Kirsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It looks like FreeNX only runs on 32-bit, won't run on 64-bit kernel. >> Is that correct? If so, is VNC the next best alternative? >> >>

Re: [CentOS] Trying to understand Remote desktops

>> >> Trying to save memory on the server >> >> But wait, the client has even LESS memory :( > > Freenx/NX will use more memory at both ends than a plain remote X > session because it gets most of its performance gain and the ability > to suspend a r