On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 10:43:34 AM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> What is the best way to approach this?
the one you already mentioned:
> set up fetchmail (or something) to do the pop downloads of incoming
> mail, and have some kind of a local imap server running though which
> I access the actual mail
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 20:29:02 PM +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> I don't recall whether the OP expressed whether that was the case or
> not, though I think he mentioned wanting to backup family pictures,
> so it might very well be to a usb HD.
I am the OP. I explicitly made the example of on
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 08:07:40 AM -0500, SilverTip257 wrote:
> Yes, that's the way it works. If you change a directory name, rsync
> has no way of knowing that you moved it.
I was almost sure that this was the case, but it didn't hurt to ask
for confirmation. Thanks to you, Reindl and all the oth
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 12:29:48 PM -0500, ken wrote:
> Considering using rsync on a couple systems for backup, I was
> wondering if it's possible, and if so how difficult is it...
sorry to step in so late, but I have another question on this very topic.
I have noticed that if I just _change_ the n
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 23:51:38 PM -0500, Digimer wrote:
> I used it for many years, but switched to RoundCube as SM seems to
> not be growing much anymore. Been happy with RC so far.
I too use Squirrelmail, but found myself thinking more and more
frequently in the last months to find an alternativ
On Sat, September 15, 2012 7:44 am, Ken Smith wrote:
> Which suggests that there is something about A you need to know more
> about. As said earlier what happens if you run
>
> telnet ip-of-a whatever-port-ssh-is -on--normally-22
I had already answered to this:
http://lists.centos.org/piperma
On Sat, September 15, 2012 4:00 am, Paul Tader wrote:
> Can you post the (sanitized ) output from "ssh -vv my mybadhost.com" ?
Such output is exactly the same I get with only one "v" and already posted
in an earlier reply this morning
Thanks,
Marco
__
On Sat, September 15, 2012 12:10 am, Ken Smith wrote:
> Stephen Harris wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:21:29PM +0200, M. Fioretti wrote:
>>
>>> No, it's not, sorry for the confusion. I meant to write "as soon as the
>>> server is reachable agai
On Fri, September 14, 2012 11:48 pm, Stephen Harris wrote:
> 1) What happens if you run "telnet yourhost 22".
this is what happens (with the proper IP of course):
> Trying 1.2.3.4...
> Connected to yourhost (1.2.3.4)
> Escape character is '^]'.
> Connection closed by foreign
On Fri, September 14, 2012 10:09 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> I'll try that as the server is reachable again.
>
> It's now reachable?
No, it's not, sorry for the confusion. I meant to write "as soon as the
server is reachable again"
Marco
___
CentOS
On Fri, September 14, 2012 9:06 pm, Karl Vogel wrote:
>>> On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:09:46 +0200 (CEST),
>>> "M. Fioretti" said:
>
> M> Yesterday I completed (fingers crossed) the switch to a different ADSL
> M> provider. From the moment I turned on th
On Fri, September 14, 2012 5:32 pm, Scott Silva wrote:
> Could the server A have a firewall that had allow ranges for your
> original ip range? Or denyhosts... something like that
No, there are no such settings.
Answering to other questions:
> have you checked with your ADSL provider, to
> see
Greetings,
I have accounts on two Centos servers, A and B, each hosted on a remote
VPS by a different provider/datacenter.
Until yesterday night, I could connect without problems via SSH to both
servers from my home Fedora 16 desktop.
Yesterday I completed (fingers crossed) the switch to a diffe
On Thu, September 6, 2012 7:14 pm, Marco Fioretti wrote:
> Greetings,
> I run my own email server for some domains I administer, on a centos
> vps server with a very small number of users.
>
> The only services are smtp, imap/pop, webmail
>
> Everything was running without problems until this morn
On Fri, March 30, 2012 5:26 am, Nataraj wrote:
> So for example if I assign an email address for incoming mail from a
> mailing list and then setup a whitelist entry that only allows that
> address to receive email from the mailservers that serve that mailing
> list and then blacklist all other i
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 16:06:23 PM +1000, Christopher Hawker wrote:
> When you login to your vps, are you authenticating the connection via
> password or certificate?
password
thanks,
Marco
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 07:42:28 AM -0400, David McGuffey wrote:
> So...what is the appropriate way to respond when one is receiving
> the digest version?
It probably is to automatically split the digest into the original,
separate message as soon as it arrives, using procmail or
formail. Search for
On Sun, May 17, 2009 00:36:00 AM +0200, Marco Fioretti wrote:
> I have the website http://digifreedom.net running on a Centos 4 VPS
> with Apache and Drupal 6.10... Everything worked perfectly for
> months, if not years... what happens now is that, if I type
> http://digifreedom.net/node/82 the br
On Sat, May 16, 2009 19:32:46 PM -0400, Stephen Harris wrote:
>
> The owner needs to pay their bill.
I *had* paid it yesterday morning or Thursday morning, and also got
from the ISP the confirmation that the payment was OK...
Marco
___
CentOS mailing
sorry for the vague subject, but I couldn't find a better one.
I have the website http://digifreedom.net running on a Centos 4 VPS
with Apache and Drupal 6.10 . This is a multisite Drupal setup: only
one installation, with subdirectories in sites/, and a separate mysql
database for each website. F
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 14:23:30 PM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks (even if late!) for the suggestions, I've applied them.
>>>
>> A reply in 3 days is late? That is good for a lot of lists.
>> Your thank you almost 2 weeks later is what is late.
>
> I think that's wh
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 01:15:41 AM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> M. Fioretti wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> there is a remote (VPS) Centos 4.2 server which *may* have been
>> compromised. Reinstalling everything from scratch isn't a problem, it
>> may even be an occasion to
Hi,
there is a remote (VPS) Centos 4.2 server which *may* have been
compromised. Reinstalling everything from scratch isn't a problem, it
may even be an occasion to improve a few things, the question is
another.
There are backups of necessary shell script, ASCII configuration files
and more or le
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 15:03:50 PM +1000, Harry Sukumar wrote:
> I am trying to help (voluntary service) a country side school
> (Aboriginal community) in Northern Queensland Australia
Harry,
does/will this school have a website, or at least one web page
somewhere, where it presents itself and men
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 04:24:35 AM -0700, Akemi Yagi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 10/6/07, Steven Haigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 2) rpm --rebuilddb will do what you need.
>
> Run this command with lots of caution. Take a look at this page:
>
> http://www.oldrpm.org/hintskinks/repairdb
Hello,
while doing some maintenance on a Centos 4.4 box, I ran rpm -qa --last
and got:
error: rpmdb: damaged header #91 retrieved -- skipping.
...lots of lines identical to the one above and finally:
the_last_package_I_installed_yesterday.rpm
all the other rpms in reverse installation order
I'v
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 16:52:20 PM +0700, beast ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> If this is a dedicated mailserver, i prefer installing postfix from
> source.
I don't, I explicitly mentioned I want to maintain the server via yum/rpm
without installing compilers and what not. Thanks anyway,
Marco
--
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 09:42:17 AM +0200, io ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Before launching rpm or yum, however, I'd like to ask the list which
> way you think is the best way to do this. By "best" I mean the way
> which:
>
> * has no known issues, gotchas, extra configuration tricks...
> * has as l
Greetings,
I would like to install Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 (I need support for SASL
authentication via Dovecot) on a Centos 4.4 server.
I have already found rpm packages at
http://postfix.wl0.org/en/available-packages/ and pages about using
the centosplus repo for postfix.
Before launching rpm or yum
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 23:45:38 PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> >- set up only ssh2 on a non standard port
> >
> >I agree, but I have noticed in the past, and read in several places,
> >that it's not security through obscurity: its main usefulness would
> >not as much
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 12:19:23 PM -0500, Johnny Hughes
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> Don't turn off SELinux.
> >
> > Hmmm... I had also forgotten this side of the package. I will be
> > running on a rented VPS, can SELinux be used in such contexts?
> >
> > Also, frankly I am not up to date on t
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 10:33:14 AM +0200, Ralph Angenendt
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > - set up itables (what would the safest iptables script to do all and
> > only the services listed above?
>
> Depends on from where you want to connect to your imap server. From
> everywhere?
yes. More exact
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 15:12:34 PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> My first point is going over the long list
> http://iase.disa.mil/stigs/stig/unix-stig-v5r1.pdf and figuring out
> what meets the local environment.
> >- set up only ssh2 on a non standard port
>
> Depending
Greetings, everybody
I've browsed around a bit, but there seems to be no single practical
list of this kind.
What would you do to make a new Centos server which must run apache,
IMAP (Dovecot) and SMTP (PostFix) and nothing else for a few domains
as secure from attacks as possible, using only sta
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 17:14:55 PM -0700, Karl R. Balsmeier
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
># *openssl genrsa -out /etc/ssl/private/server.key 1024*
>
># *openssl req -new -key /etc/ssl/private/server.key -out
>/etc/ssl/private/server.csr*
>
># *openssl x509 -req -days 365 -in /etc/ss
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 15:21:31 PM -0500, Jay Leafey
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have a strong aversion to re-inventing the wheel,
Me too, unless when it's a hidden wheel. Fact is, this is the *first*
time I hear mention of this approach. See my original comments about
SSL being one of the worst
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 06:32:42 AM -0700, Paul Heinlein
> You don't need a CA to create a single self-signed certificate.
I see. Actually, this is just one of those things that is not clear at
all from the online docs I found.
> >1) cd /usr/share/ssl
> >2) modify openssl.cnf to have your Common Na
37 matches
Mail list logo
