: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2 internet connections and one for backup
Mark A. Lewis wrote:
> Apparently, someone didn't get what they wanted for
> Christmas, is grumpy and feels like being the list police.
> Lighten up man...
>
Do me a favour while I turn the Chri
> You are still flouting the rules of posting on the mailing list
> even after I sent you a polite offlist message not to top-post.
> Read the following link on how to post on the CentOS list.
>
> http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16
>
> Regards,
> Vandaman.
Apparently, someon
IPCop won't stop it. It will let you put a firewall rule in to block them, but
you can do that with regular iptables.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lanny Marcus
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:12 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: R
> I don't trust paypal with my real CC#. Yay for temporary numbers.
What's to trust? They do anything unauthorized, call your CC company and let
them take care of it. That's the beauty of credit cards, your liability is
almost nothing.
___
CentOS maili
> I'm sorry, but I just can't understand why I can't find these
>
> Anne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# pwd
/root
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat .bashrc
# .bashrc
# User specific aliases and functions
alias rm='rm -i'
alias cp='cp -i'
alias mv='mv -i'
# Source global definitions
if [ -f /etc/bashrc ]; then
>Well, there are ways and there are ways. An e-mail that allows a single
>reply to confirm an abuse report (avoiding spurious reports/spams) could
>be sent to the original reporter. Have a single change needed, varied
>with an arbitrary value to avoid mechanical responses, could accomplish
>the sam
>Just the idea of a autoresponder for abuse mail account is dang scary. Would
>make a spammers job easy.
>I do not use autoresponders ever for any accounts. I have the server eat all
>mail that comes in and not bounce them off, Again, a good thing for a
>spammer to find.
And what are they going to
>Male Bovine Defecation! If yahoo is going to provide mail services,
>they damn well should do it in a responsible manner. Just becaue
>they are big does not exempt them from this responsibility. On
>the contrary, the large free mail providers, yahoo, hotmail,
>gmail, etc. are frequently used by
>This is why the RFC clearly states that you must answer certain email
>addresses; abuse@ being one! If you don't follow the RFC's than how
>can anyone expect your protocols or operations to be compliant with
>any standards?
>
>Now, someone decided, in their infinite wisdom, that if you send an
>au
Looking at the structure on one of the mirrors should help you:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 1:36 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Create Local
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Garrick Staples
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 4:32 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 on i586
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 12:40:55PM -0800, MHR alleged:
> On Feb 8, 2008 9:02 AM, Ray Van
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Weaver
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 8:09 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firewall frustration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:21:34 -0500
Robert
> I would love to find a Linux laptop that had good wi-fi support.
> Including WPA and using an integrated wi-fi adaptor. Having to edit a
> File to connect to a secure access point is not user friendly if you
> ask me.
I haven't tried with CentOS, but my new Compaq/HP NC6400 Intel chipset
based
13 matches
Mail list logo
