Re: [CentOS] youtube-dl No module named 'pkg_resources'

2019-05-08 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Wed, 8 May 2019 09:08:12 -0500 (CDT) Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Wed, 8 May 2019, Nux! wrote: > > > How did you install it? > > Most recently > yum reinstall youtube-dl > > > I'm using their binary and it works great, just tested it. > > > > https://ytdl-org.github.io/youtube-dl/download.h

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 8 released

2019-05-07 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 7 May 2019 11:05:29 -0700 John Pierce wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 10:59 AM Marko Vojinovic > wrote: > > > > Which Fedora release was used as a base(*) for RHEL 8? > > Wikipedia says, "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 is based on Fedora 28 Oh, RHEL 8 has jus

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 8 released

2019-05-07 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 7 May 2019 10:07:15 -0400 Rich Bowen wrote: > This morning Red Hat announced the general availability of Red Hat > Enterprise Linux 8. Which Fedora release was used as a base(*) for RHEL 8? (*) As far as I am aware, RH constructs each release by taking a snapshot of a current Fedora, an

Re: [CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

2019-01-22 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:41:09 -0800 Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:01 AM Akemi Yagi wrote: > > > > That output indicates that that kmod package is built for the EL 7.5 > > kernel and is not compatible with the current kernel. I suggest you > > file a request to have the kmod-8188eu

Re: [CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

2019-01-22 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:03:22 -0500 Mike Burger wrote: > On 2019-01-22 11:01, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:54 AM Marko Vojinovic > > wrote: > >> I am having trouble using the realtek wifi chip in my new tp-link > >> usb wifi dongle. [sni

Re: [CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

2019-01-22 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:01:55 -0800 Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:54 AM Marko Vojinovic > wrote: > > > > I am having trouble using the realtek wifi chip in my new tp-link > > usb wifi dongle. [snip] > > However, yum install kmod-8188eu refuses to inst

[CentOS] Yum refuses to install kmod-8188eu from elrepo

2019-01-22 Thread Marko Vojinovic
I am having trouble using the realtek wifi chip in my new tp-link usb wifi dongle. Upon plugging it, the device gets registered by the kernel (in /var/log/messages), but that's about it, no network device is being created (iwconfig does not see it, nothing else works). A few google searches late

Re: [CentOS] How to troubleshoot partial shutdown problem?

2019-01-01 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 12:47:42 +0100 Marko Vojinovic wrote: > after issuing a regular shutdown, > the system starts the shutdown procedure, but stalls at some point, > and never finishes. It gets to the console, writes the "powering down" > message and stops there --- the h

[CentOS] How to troubleshoot partial shutdown problem?

2019-01-01 Thread Marko Vojinovic
Hi folks, I've never encountered the following problem before (but I guess there is a first time for everything) --- after issuing a regular shutdown, the system starts the shutdown procedure, but stalls at some point, and never finishes. It gets to the console, writes the "powering down" messag

Re: [CentOS] Percent bar on screen - for 2 seconds

2015-08-07 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015 00:07:35 + (GMT) Wes James wrote: > Every once in awhile I see this horizontal percent bar flash up on > the screen then disappear. What is that? > > CentOS 7.1,  kde. Is it a laptop, running on batteries? I have a configuration with a laptop with an external monitor

Re: [CentOS] An odd X question

2015-06-25 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:55:41 -0400 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > > mark "and why is it called xorg-x11-server, when in X > terminology, it's the client?"* > > * Which I always thought was bass-ackward, but... You should think of it this way: the program that wants something drawn on the screen

Re: [CentOS] LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?

2015-06-24 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:40:59 -0700 Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 06/23/2015 08:10 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > > For concreteness, let's say I have a guest machine, with a > > dedicated physical partition for it, on a single drive. Or, I have > > the same thing, on

Re: [CentOS] LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?

2015-06-23 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 19:08:24 -0700 Gordon Messmer wrote: > > Such as: > 1) LVM makes MBR and GPT systems more consistent with each other, > reducing the probability of a bug that affects only one. > 2) LVM also makes RAID and non-RAID systems more consistent with each > other, reducing the prob

Re: [CentOS] LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?

2015-06-23 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:42:13 -0700 Gordon Messmer wrote: > > I wondered the same thing, especially in the context of someone who > prefers virtual machines. LV-backed VMs have *dramatically* better > disk performance than file-backed VMs. Ok, you made me curious. Just how dramatic can it be? F

Re: [CentOS] LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?

2015-06-23 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:23:52 -0400 Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Marko Vojinovic > wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:15:30 -0500 > > Jason Warr wrote: > >> > >> I'm curious what has made some people hate LVM so much. >

Re: [CentOS] Recording piano and voice

2015-06-23 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:14:08 -0600 Frank Cox wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:15:35 -0400 > Lamar Owen wrote: > > > The USB MIDI port won't give you audio, just MIDI text. > > That's what I thought. To this point, I've never done anything MIDI > and I really don't know much about that; I just u

Re: [CentOS] LVM hatred, was Re: /boot on a separate partition?

2015-06-23 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:15:30 -0500 Jason Warr wrote: > > I'm curious what has made some people hate LVM so much. I have been > using it for years on thousands of production systems with no issues > that could not be easily explained as myself or someone else doing > something stupid. And eve

Re: [CentOS] /boot on a separate partition?

2015-06-23 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 10:42:35 -0400 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Timothy Murphy wrote: > > Do most people today have /boot on a separate partition, > > or do they (you) have it on the / partition ? > > > Separate partition, 100% of the time. Inside / (which is mostly always ext4), 100% of the time. :

Re: [CentOS] C7: EPEL conflicts with Base and ElRepo?

2015-06-19 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 14:54:21 -0500 Johnny Hughes wrote: > To be perfectly honest, the differences between EPEL and Base+extras > can usually be completely ignored anyway. > > While somethings may be in epel and extras .. and the extras versions > might lag, the extras version likely came from EPE

Re: [CentOS] C7: EPEL conflicts with Base and ElRepo?

2015-06-19 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 11:36:45 +0100 (BST) John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > > Well, a list of names of those conflicting packages would be nice to > > have. Or instructions how to ask yum to compile it. > > yum update -d3 Wow! Excellen

Re: [CentOS] C7: EPEL conflicts with Base and ElRepo?

2015-06-19 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 07:51:36 +0100 Ned Slider wrote: > The overlap between elrepo and EPEL is due to the 5 VirtualGL packages > in elrepo. > > VirtualGL packages, albeit 64-bit only, are also available in EPEL. > They don't appear to be shipping the 32-bit VirtualGL libs. Exactly what I wanted t

Re: [CentOS] C7: EPEL conflicts with Base and ElRepo?

2015-06-19 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:13:25 -0700 Akemi Yagi wrote: > One thing people should be aware is that EPEL is built for RHEL and > that the package list is not the same between RHEL and CentOS. For > example, CentOS adds cloud-related ones to the centos-extras repo > which may overlap EPEL's. Thanks fo

Re: [CentOS] C7: EPEL conflicts with Base and ElRepo?

2015-06-19 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:01:43 +0200 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: > You are correct, but what "more info" do you want? Well, a list of names of those conflicting packages would be nice to have. Or instructions how to ask yum to compile it. > You've spelled it > out quite well, you have the solution

Re: [CentOS] C7: EPEL conflicts with Base and ElRepo?

2015-06-18 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:53:14 -0400 Fred Smith wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:04:04PM +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > This just came to my attention --- I have CentOS 7 installed on one > > machine, and have configu

[CentOS] C7: EPEL conflicts with Base and ElRepo?

2015-06-18 Thread Marko Vojinovic
Hi everyone, This just came to my attention --- I have CentOS 7 installed on one machine, and have configured elrepo and epel as additional repositories. When I turned on the yum-priorities package (and set up priorities in the order base&updates < elrepo < epel), it turns out that there are 65 c

Re: [CentOS] Looking for a life-save LVM Guru

2015-02-27 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:24:57 -0800 John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/27/2015 4:52 PM, Khemara Lyn wrote: > > > > What is the right way to recover the remaining PVs left? > > take a filing cabinet packed full of 10s of 1000s of files of 100s of > pages each, with the index cards interleaved in the fi

Re: [CentOS] Another Fedora decision

2015-01-30 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:15:05 -0800 Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Scott Robbins > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 03:39:47PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:13:17 -0500 > >> Scott Robbins wrote: > >> > You may have noticed how if Fedora, by some odd sc

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 Nvidia openGL breaks vncserver

2014-11-18 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:32:36 -0700 Stan Cruise wrote: > Bare metal Centos 6.5, vncserver running, client able to connect with > perfect resolution. Nvidia GT240, driver 331.49. > > Upgrade to Centos 7 with nouveau basic driver, all still works fine. > Resolution poor on wire connected monitor,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 equivalents in CentOS 7

2014-10-30 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:04:32 + Always Learning wrote: > > The order of rules in any IPtables table is pure common sense and very > logical. Essentially, the first rule is the first action. The second > rule is the second action etc. Sure, I do know how it works. :-) However, the iptables req

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 equivalents in CentOS 7

2014-10-30 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 16:24:02 +1300 Peter wrote: > On 10/30/2014 04:16 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote: > > yes, so I just figured out. Thank you so much. Where does > > `semanage` come from? I tried policycoreutils-python but it cannot > > be found. > > It should be in policycoreutils-python.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 equivalents in CentOS 7

2014-10-30 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 03:56:58 + Always Learning wrote: > iptables -A table-name -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT > > No reboot needed. 'table-name' can be INPUT or another user defined > table name. > > firewall-cmd with its Windoze-like structure and syntax is definitely > unappealing to many no

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 equivalents in CentOS 7

2014-10-29 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:50:54 -0700 "Jason T. Slack-Moehrle" wrote: > I tried to install CentOS 7 on a new system. It works. > > However, I'm noticing small things: > 1. system-config-network-tui is not installed and yum cannot find it. > I realized for this -- nmtui > > What about firewall? I c

Re: [CentOS] Systemd Adding Its Own Console To Linux Systems

2014-10-10 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:05:19 -0500 (CDT) "Valeri Galtsev" wrote: > It is about fundamental approach. We always modularize things: split > into smaller subunits each of the last doing its smaller task. This > allows to make smaller things work reliably, and test these smaller > things more comprehe

Re: [CentOS] Skype on CentOS 6.5

2014-08-18 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 21:09:41 -0400 Mark LaPierre wrote: > About a week ago my Skype installation stopped working. I can start > it up but I can't log on. [snip] > Can anyone offer some sound advice to getting my Skype running again? The reason skype stopped working is that Microsoft decided to c

Re: [CentOS] KVM in CentOS 5?

2014-08-07 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 23:39:01 +0300 Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2014-08-07 23:21 GMT+03:00 Marko Vojinovic : > > > On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 22:54:40 +0300 > > Eero Volotinen wrote: > > > 2014-08-07 22:49 GMT+03:00 Marko Vojinovic : > > So, is there any possibility to have

Re: [CentOS] KVM in CentOS 5?

2014-08-07 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 16:27:50 -0400 Fred Smith wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 09:21:31PM +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 22:54:40 +0300 > > Eero Volotinen wrote: > > > 2014-08-07 22:49 GMT+03:00 Marko Vojinovic : > > > > I've been

Re: [CentOS] KVM in CentOS 5?

2014-08-07 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 22:54:40 +0300 Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2014-08-07 22:49 GMT+03:00 Marko Vojinovic : > > I've been trying to do some KVM virtualization on a C5 host, and to > > my surprise, there seems to be no kvm package in any of the repos. > > read docs at &

[CentOS] KVM in CentOS 5?

2014-08-07 Thread Marko Vojinovic
Hi folks, I've been trying to do some KVM virtualization on a C5 host, and to my surprise, there seems to be no kvm package in any of the repos. Yum install kvm says: No package kvm available. Nothing to do This machine is a CentOS release 5.10 (Final) with the 2.6.18-371.11.1.el5 kernel. Also

Re: [CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

2014-07-15 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 10:32:16 -0500 Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Jonathan Billings > wrote: > > It also is > > significantly less-featureful than a shell programming language. > > Yes, you're going to be using shell elsewhere, but in my > > experience, the structure of m

Re: [CentOS] List attitude and content

2014-07-14 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:44:25 +1000 Anthony K wrote: > Having to open up a thread just to find +1 is a waste of time for us > all! +1 // Sorry, couldn't resist... ;-) // Best, :-) Marko ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org

Re: [CentOS] OpenVPN problem

2014-02-11 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 01:15:15 + Timothy Murphy wrote: > I'm interested to know how you - or anyone else implementing OpenVPN - > actually uses it in practice. Well, I tend to support a number of people (Linux/computing noobs in general), maintaining their laptops and desktops. So each machine

Re: [CentOS] OpenVPN problem

2014-02-10 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:33:49 + Timothy Murphy wrote: > I have OpenVPN set up; I found the brief instructions > that come with CentOS openvpn (eg /etc/openvpn/2.0/README) > perfectly adequate - what I'm asking about is the _use_ of OpenVPN. Sorry, what exactly are you asking for here? The imp

Re: [CentOS] OpenVPN problem

2014-02-09 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:14:12 + Ken Smith wrote: > Its down to the question about what you are needing to do. If you > just need SSH access then SSH direct without VPN is just fine. SSH > itself is encrypted and the VPN just encrypts the already encrypted > traffic again and just slows things d

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public

2013-12-12 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 01:19:26 +1300 Peter wrote: > Right, but core should be just the bare minimum. NetworkManager is > certainly not required to configure your network, in fact el7 runs > just fine without it. Just set your ifcfg-eth0 scripts, etc, and > you're good to go. By the same logic you

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 VirtualBox

2013-12-05 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:28:29 -0800 John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/5/2013 12:30 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > AFAIK, KVM does not support host CPU's which don't have > > virtualization support. If OP has somewhat aged hardware, he may > > have no option but to use

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 VirtualBox

2013-12-05 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 09:50:41 -0800 John R Pierce wrote: > On 12/5/2013 5:35 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: > > Precisely! An the host being the CentOS 6.5 system. Perhaps I wasn't > > clear enough about this, although it seemed obvious when I wrote > > the post. > > > > The guest OS really doesn't come i

Re: [CentOS] k3b -> cddb doesn't work

2013-08-21 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:18:48 -0700 John R Pierce wrote: > On 8/21/2013 10:05 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > But Debian attacked cdrtools for using the GPL when it has been > > 100% GPL. > > I find this an extremely odd assertation. I am not nor ever have > been a Debian user, but I know Debian i

Re: [CentOS] k3b -> cddb doesn't work

2013-08-21 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:09:10 +0200 Joerg Schilling wrote: > Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > > So if you want your software to be used by the majority of Linux > > distros without license-related hiccups, you can always just > > re-license it to GPL and everyone will be ha

Re: [CentOS] k3b -> cddb doesn't work

2013-08-21 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:25:23 +0200 Joerg Schilling wrote: > John R Pierce wrote: > > The allegation was that some of it is CDDL, which is problematic. > > The CDDL was accepted as definitely OSS compliant by bopensource.org > within 14 days and without to mention problems. > > The GPL did take

Re: [CentOS] RHEL Subscriptions

2013-08-18 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:50:23 -0700 Keith Keller wrote: > On 2013-08-19, Anthony K wrote: > > > > I was recently approached by Dell stating that I HAVE TO renew my > > Red Hat Subscriptions. > > ...or what? ...or else!!! // ...sorry, couldn't resist... :-D // :-) Marko __

Re: [CentOS] convert webpage to image

2013-08-14 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Joseph Spenner wrote: > >From: Carl T. Miller > >To: CentOS > >Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 5:47 AM > >Subject: [CentOS] convert webpage to image > > > >What is the easiest way to convert a webpage into a jpg > >or png file?  I've seen several progra

Re: [CentOS] Touchpad doesn't work with C6, kernel-related...

2013-03-24 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:34:15 + Nux! wrote: > On 24.03.2013 14:29, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > The mainline kernel works beautifully, thanks! :-) > > > > Now the only question is how does it coexist with the regular > > kernels? More precisely, when I do a "yu

Re: [CentOS] Touchpad doesn't work with C6, kernel-related...

2013-03-24 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 07:24:25 -0700 Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Marko Vojinovic > wrote: > > I have a Fujitsu Lifebook U series laptop running updated CentOS 6.4 > > (64bit), and the touchpad doesn't work. It's a new laptop, the > > tou

[CentOS] Touchpad doesn't work with C6, kernel-related...

2013-03-23 Thread Marko Vojinovic
Hi folks! :-) I have a Fujitsu Lifebook U series laptop running updated CentOS 6.4 (64bit), and the touchpad doesn't work. It's a new laptop, the touchpad works correctly in Fedora 18 Live (given the kernel parameters below), no hardware problems. I searched the web all around, and it's a known

Re: [CentOS] X/Display resolution configuration

2012-10-08 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday, 8. October 2012. 15.54.19 Mike Watson wrote: > Here's the output of "xrandr." My Xorg.0.log does not exist. That is very very weird. The log file should exist. Here is one of my machines: [root@bojan ~]# ll /var/log/Xorg.0.log -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 31880 Sep 21 14:18 /var/log/Xorg.0

Re: [CentOS] X/Display resolution configuration

2012-10-08 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday, 8. October 2012. 12.52.18 Mike Watson wrote: > On 10/08/2012 12:38 PM, Nux! wrote: > > On 08.10.2012 18:20, Mike Watson wrote: > >> I've installed CentOS 6.3 on a new system. I've a nagging problem > >> that > >> I'm trying to fix---the screen resolution changes. I've a flat screen > >>

Re: [CentOS] slowness with new kernel+nouveau?

2012-08-16 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday, 16. August 2012. 16.34.01 Sorin Srbu wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > > Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us > > Sent: den 16 augusti 2012 16:13 > > To: CentOS mailing list > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] slowness with ne

Re: [CentOS] SSD as system drive - partitioning question

2012-04-17 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tuesday, 17. April 2012. 17.40.32 Frank Cox wrote: > My plan is to have everything that doesn't change (much) on the SSD, such > as /boot, /lib, /bin and so on. I want to put /tmp and /var and /home on > the regular hard drive. > > Now that I'm at the stage of actually setting this up I have d

Re: [CentOS] Need help configuring wireless NIC

2012-03-28 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tuesday, 27. March 2012. 19.45.33 Ned Slider wrote: > That ndiswrapper issue should hopefully be fixed now with the > kmod-ndiswrapper-1.57-1.el6 release. It at least gives you that option > should the native driver prove fruitless. Indeed, the new ndiswrapper works perfectly! :-) The compat-wi

Re: [CentOS] Need help configuring wireless NIC

2012-03-26 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tuesday, 27. March 2012. 10.02.25 Arun Khan wrote: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > Yesterday I managed to find a driver for my USB wireless dongle, and it is > > now correctly recognized by the kernel. However, I don't know how to > > c

[CentOS] Need help configuring wireless NIC

2012-03-24 Thread Marko Vojinovic
Hi everyone! :-) Yesterday I managed to find a driver for my USB wireless dongle, and it is now correctly recognized by the kernel. However, I don't know how to configure it. The system-config-network opens up in text mode and is not very forthcoming (it lists ethernet, ISDN and modem as poss

Re: [CentOS] Ndiswrapper refuses to install?

2012-03-23 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Friday, 23. March 2012. 21.36.54 Ned Slider wrote: > On 23/03/12 21:16, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > I have a problem with making a wireless USB dongle work under CentOS 6. > > The > > dongle is known to not work natively under Linux and last time I used it > > (cca 3

Re: [CentOS] Ndiswrapper refuses to install?

2012-03-23 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Friday, 23. March 2012. 14.36.26 Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > >> This time I was hoping to make it work again in the same way. But the > >> "yum > >&

[CentOS] Ndiswrapper refuses to install?

2012-03-23 Thread Marko Vojinovic
Hi everyone! :-) I have a problem with making a wireless USB dongle work under CentOS 6. The dongle is known to not work natively under Linux and last time I used it (cca 3 years ago) I managed to get it working using ndiswrapper. This time I was hoping to make it work again in the same way. B

Re: [CentOS] Sound drop out with totem. mplayer Can't open audio device /dev/dsp

2012-02-12 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Sunday 12 February 2012 18:03:03 Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 02/12/2012 05:07 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > > Hey all. > > > > This morning I found that my audio playback is randomly sprinkled with > > sound skips and dropouts. I went to /var/log/yum.log and found this: > > > > Feb 09 20:18:

Re: [CentOS] How does a linux DHCP machine inform DNS of its name and obtained address

2012-01-31 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 22:06:53 Jerry Geis wrote: > I am using a number of DHCP devices on a network. Working fine with > CentOS 5 x86_64. > My question is now how do I tell the DNS (after I get my DHCP address) > about my devices > name and IP address so that others can find me by my machine

Re: [CentOS] confidence in partitioning tool (6.2)

2012-01-31 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 05:34:21 Larry Martell wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:15 PM, Arun Khan wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Ken godee wrote: > >> Maybe a little different answer than you're looking for > >> > >> But why not install VMware Workstation (free)? > > > > T

Re: [CentOS] NOUVEAU driver video acceleration

2012-01-15 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Sunday 15 January 2012 21:57:28 Mark LaPierre wrote: > On 01/15/2012 09:34 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > If you absolutely need 3D acceleration, maybe take a look at the nvidia > > proprietary drivers --- you can find CentOS-packaged yum-installable > > rpm's in

Re: [CentOS] NOUVEAU driver video acceleration

2012-01-15 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Sunday 15 January 2012 10:58:35 Mark LaPierre wrote: > My Xorg.0.log file says: [snip] > [ 64601.469]GeForce 6 (NV4x) > [ 64601.474] (--) NOUVEAU(0): Chipset: "NVIDIA NV4b" > > I have no xorg.conf file. > > I have a GeForce 7 (G7x) chip set on my video card. The NOUVEAU driver > is

Re: [CentOS] Is avahi essential?

2012-01-15 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Saturday 14 January 2012 21:43:00 Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/14/2012 04:19 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > If running mediatomb avoids the necessity for Avahi, > > can you give a concrete example of a situation where Avahi_is_ needed? > > I did. "If two PCs were running a collaborative edito

Re: [CentOS] vmware player CentOS 6 2-button 3-button touch pad with pointing device Lenovo ThinkPad

2012-01-10 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 09 January 2012 23:36:53 Igor Furlan wrote: > Is there a way to revert the 'copy&paste' functionality back to the > traditional UNIX way of doing it, > highlight the text with left mouse/touchpad button and paste it with > the middle mouse/touchpad button. AFAIK, it *should* work while i

Re: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'

2012-01-09 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 09 January 2012 15:29:59 Daniel J Walsh wrote: > file_t means the file has no label, so the only way to create this > type of file would be to remove the security attributes on the file. > On an SELinux system, file_t should never be created, they are only > created on a disabled SELinux

Re: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'

2012-01-09 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 09 January 2012 11:45:26 Daniel J Walsh wrote: > SELinux has no idea what the labels are in /tmp, so restorecon will > not change the labels. It would be best to just remove the content > from /tmp and allow new content to be created. If you want the > content to be accessible from apac

Re: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'

2012-01-08 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Sunday 08 January 2012 04:31:05 Bennett Haselton wrote: > [root@g6950-21025 ~]# ls -lZ /tmp/hostname_SKYSLICE.INFO > -rw-r--r-- apache apache system_u:object_r:file_t > /tmp/hostname_SKYSLICE.INFO > [root@g6950-21025 ~]# restorecon -v /tmp/hostname_SKYSLICE.INFO > [root@g6950-21025 ~]# ls -lZ /

Re: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'

2012-01-07 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Saturday 07 January 2012 17:23:57 Bennett Haselton wrote: > [root@g6950-21025 ~]# ls -lZ /tmp/hostname_SKYSLICE.INFO > -rw-r--r-- apache apache system_u:object_r:file_t > /tmp/hostname_SKYSLICE.INFO > > Any ideas? What does # restorecon -v /tmp/hostname_SKYSLICE.INFO return? HTH, :-) Marko

Re: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'

2012-01-07 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Saturday 07 January 2012 08:15:35 Bennett Haselton wrote: > On 1/7/2012 6:50 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > On Saturday 07 January 2012 05:39:15 Bennett Haselton wrote: > >> Apparently the marketplace favors hosting companies turning SELinux > >> off > >> be

Re: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'

2012-01-07 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Saturday 07 January 2012 05:39:15 Bennett Haselton wrote: > On 1/7/2012 5:25 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 04:43:31AM -0800, Bennett Haselton wrote: > >> Virtually every hosting company I've ever bought a CentOS server from > >> has had SELinux turned off by default. (

Re: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'

2012-01-07 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Saturday 07 January 2012 04:43:31 Bennett Haselton wrote: > On 1/7/2012 4:16 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > IMHO, if a hosting company does that sort of things (especially turning > > off SELinux), I wouldn't touch them with a ten-foot pole. Who knows > > what else

Re: [CentOS] SELinux and access across 'similar types'

2012-01-07 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Friday 06 January 2012 18:27:05 Bennett Haselton wrote: > On 1/6/2012 6:16 PM, RILINDO FOSTER wrote: > > On Jan 6, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Bennett Haselton wrote: > >> I'm pretty sure this machine was never "upgraded to CentOS 5.2", it > >> was > >> just imaged with 5.7 when the hosting company set i

Re: [CentOS] yum warning...

2012-01-05 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 05 January 2012 06:17:17 John Doe wrote: > # yum update > ... > Downloading Packages: > vsftpd-2.2.2-6.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm | 149 > kB 00:01 Running rpm_check_debug > Running Transaction Test > Transaction Test Succeeded > Running Transaction > Warn

Re: [CentOS] A simplistic parental-control setup

2012-01-05 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 05 January 2012 01:39:49 Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 01/05/2012 12:58 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > I am looking at the simplest (implementation-wise) solution to the > > following problem (on CentOS 6.2): > > > > I have a list of web addresses (

Re: [CentOS] A simplistic parental-control setup

2012-01-05 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 05 January 2012 11:16:05 Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 01/05/2012 01:21 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > On Wednesday 04 January 2012 18:04:43 Frank Cox wrote: > >> On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:58:17 +0000 Marko Vojinovic wrote: > >>> The point is that I ne

Re: [CentOS] A simplistic parental-control setup

2012-01-04 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 18:04:43 Frank Cox wrote: > On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:58:17 +0000 Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > The point is that I need a simple, easy-to-implement, easy-to-configure > > and easy-to-maintain solution for this particular usecase. > > Put the disallowe

[CentOS] A simplistic parental-control setup

2012-01-04 Thread Marko Vojinovic
I am looking at the simplest (implementation-wise) solution to the following problem (on CentOS 6.2): I have a list of web addresses (like http://www.example.com, https://1.2.3.4/, etc.) that should be "forbidden" to access from a particular host. On access attempt, the browser should be redir

Re: [CentOS] an actual hacked machine, in a preserved state

2012-01-04 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 11:58:07 Bennett Haselton wrote: > If *everyone* used a 12-char random password, then the odds are that > *none* of the 10 million machines attacking 100 million servers would > hit on a success, not when there are 10^21 possible passwords to choose > from. It is too n

Re: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?

2011-12-30 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Friday 30 December 2011 19:40:55 夜神 岩男 wrote: [snip] > We can start a 10,000 computer botnet (or, more realistically, a 10m > computer botnet these days, and this is a technique used right now) > working on the problem of assembling a new index table that orders and > assigns every possible val

Re: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?

2011-12-29 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 29 December 2011 14:59:14 Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 29.12.2011 14:21, schrieb Marko Vojinovic: > >> so explain me why discuss to use or not to use the best > >> currently availbale method in context of security? > > > > Using the ssh key can be probl

Re: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?

2011-12-29 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 29 December 2011 13:07:56 Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 29.12.2011 12:56, schrieb Leonard den Ottolander: > > Hello Reindl, > > > > On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 12:29 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> Am 29.12.2011 09:17, schrieb Bennett Haselton: > >>> Even though the ssh key is more > >>> random

Re: [CentOS] 6.x - find interface with link up

2011-12-16 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 15 December 2011 16:04:35 Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:39 PM, wrote: > In earlier versions 'mii-tool' would iterate over interfaces and > show > which have link up. In 6.x it wants an interface as a parameter. > What is the appropriate way to f

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-13 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Saturday 12 November 2011 22:47:28 Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > On Friday 11 November 2011 07:44, John Hodrien wrote: > > grub in EL6 can boot of ext4, and that's grub-0.97-68.el6.x86_64. > > Grub (version 1) from CentOS 6 has apparently been patched to be able to > handle ext4. There's no doubt

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-08 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tuesday 08 November 2011 14:32:06 Johnny Hughes wrote: > Instead of everyone speculating what Red Hat would charge for a given > situation (I have a virtual machine on the cloud with 16 VCPUs ... I > have 1 machine with 8 Quad Core CPUs, I have X with Y, etc.) on the > CentOS mailing list ... th

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-08 Thread Marko Vojinovic
Am I missing something here, or is the conversation below just an elaborate joke on my expense? Am 07.11.2011 22:50, schrieb Marko Vojinovic: > > > > Typically, you have no way of knowing the physical structure of the > > > > "cloud machine" where your vi

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-07 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 07 November 2011 22:23:09 Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 07.11.2011 22:50, schrieb Marko Vojinovic: > > Typically, you have no way of knowing the physical structure of the > > "cloud machine" where your virtual machine is being hosted. Also, this > > structure m

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-07 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 07 November 2011 20:13:58 Trey Dockendorf wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:42 AM, John Beranek wrote: > > On 02/11/2011 10:31, Patrick Lists wrote: > > > On 11/02/2011 11:02 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: > > >> What is a "socket" in their pricing model? The word can mean so many > > >> d

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 updating policy

2011-11-04 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Friday 04 November 2011 13:24:32 David McGiven wrote: > I am migrating from debian to RHEL (CentOS) and I am wondering how the > CentOS 6 updating system works. > > Suppose I install CentOS 6.1 now. Suppose in 8 months CentOS 6.2 is > released. > > Now I issue a yum update, so my system will b

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-02 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Wednesday 02 November 2011 22:55:39 Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 11/02/2011 09:35 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > > There is the Oracle "unbreakable" Linux (or whatever they call it), > > which is a RHEL clone. The recent RH packaging changes are aimed > > squarely at that distro from what I understand. The

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-28 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Friday 28 October 2011 20:45:16 Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > But RH did not add restrictions. Whatever you get from them, you are free > > to redistribute, in accord with GPL. There can be *no* *legal* *action* > > aga

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-28 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Friday 28 October 2011 18:54:25 Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Ned Slider wrote: > >> The question is, how can a contract containing restrictions on what > >> you can do with GPL covered content not invalidate your own right to > >> redistribute, given that the GPL proh

Re: [CentOS] this is strange and dark

2011-09-25 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/25/2011 07:07 AM, fakessh wrote: >> hello admin >> >> This is strange and dark: it receives more than one hundred updates and >> deposits are still not updated >> >> are welcome ... > > I am not sure what this means ... anyone? Maybe s

Re: [CentOS] Was: Re: Upgrade from 5.6 => 5.7, is, programming with style

2011-09-17 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > On 9/16/11, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Remember, even among those who studied, a) half of them were in the bottom >> of their class, and b) too many are True Believers in the latest >> programming (not the P word!) paradigm; y'know, rec

  1   2   >