[CentOS] Re: small window manager

2008-09-02 Thread Michael Ekstrand
Paul Bijnens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is an alternative X window manager, supported by CentOS, > that has very small memory footprint? I'm not sure what your standard is for "supported by CentOS", but Window Maker works well and is available from EPEL. - Michael -- mouse, n: A device

[CentOS] Re: Anti Virus and Anti Spam

2008-08-29 Thread Michael Ekstrand
"horas simalango" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > New be in linux! > Currently I have Install DNS, Email and Web server using centos 4.3. > All functions are running properly! > What anti virus and anti spam recomended for me to install to my > server? I have had very good success with SpamAssassin

[CentOS] Re: Support policy CentOS 5

2008-08-21 Thread Michael Ekstrand
"Patrick Derwael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can someone tell me what the exact CentOS policy for end-of-life is > for 5.0? As far as I know, 5.0 itself is pretty much EOL; updates are not being released for it. 5, on the other hand, won't be EOL for quite a few years. > Let me explain: I hav

[CentOS] Re: Good reference for dkms?

2008-08-09 Thread Michael Ekstrand
MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1) revert to the rpmforge version and re-add it back into the dkms > tree? IIRC, this wasn't that hard to do, 'cuz it was meant to be done > in the first place. I'm using the RPMforge one, and I currently have 173.08-1.beta.el5.rf installed. And it uses dkms. I

[CentOS] Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure

2008-07-01 Thread Michael Ekstrand
"John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anybody knows what I do miss or what is going wrong? I'm not sure, but... > For the curios: > Why to recompile the kernel? > I want to rebuild the kernel because I created a patch to decrease the > kernel timer frequency from 1000 to 100 HZ. The CentOS4.