No ongoing lawsuit, AFAIK. I use their upstream repos just fine.
Oh, and I don't use tape. I use the "File" and "GlusterFile" storage types,
which work great. Gluster's a great fit, because of how easy it is to
expand your storage dedicated to backups. Just add another brick or two...
On Thu, Jul
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 8:22 PM Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
On Wed, July 15, 2015 7:05 pm, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 10:37 AM wrote:
>
> My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're
> supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, b
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 10:37 AM wrote:
My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're
supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows
binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly
of backuppc; comments on that, or other package
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> So, I'm seeing a bunch of DHCPv6 traffic coming from my CentOS7
> machines. Basically, the machines are trying to send router
> solicitations, the packets are blocked at their egress firewalls, and
> I get to see the logs.
&g
So, I'm seeing a bunch of DHCPv6 traffic coming from my CentOS7
machines. Basically, the machines are trying to send router
solicitations, the packets are blocked at their egress firewalls, and
I get to see the logs.
I don't wish to disable IPv6. I don't wish to statically configure
IPv6 at this t
I'm attempting to install RequestTracker on CentOS 6.5. Running "make
testdeps" as recommended by RT's installation guide, I'm presented with
lists of missing Perl modules.
One of these lines reads:
Encode >= 2.39 ...MISSING
Now, "yum whatprovides '*/Encode.pm' " informs me that that mo
On 05/24/2013 11:12 AM, Rock wrote:
[snip]
> < Rant > Why the Android dev team removed USB file transfer for Linux
> users is beyond me! < /Rant >
The reason is pretty straightforward...FAT sucks.
USB Mass Storage serves up a block device in a linear layout over USB.
This shows up under Linux as
On May 5, 2013 6:39 AM, "Joseph Spenner" wrote:
>
> I'm curious why any user logged in at the console can issue the 'reboot'
command and reboot the system. I've tested/verified this to work, and read
some older posts about this. If it were a bug, I suspect it would be fixed
by now.
> Also, if a
On 05/03/2013 06:05 PM, Rob Townley wrote:
> Michael, very frustrating that so much noise for a very simple request. I
> set up multi source routing in 5.3 or so and was astounded at all the
> negativity on this list and that it could not be done. It will take
> forever to read the noise in this
On 05/03/2013 05:06 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 08:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
>
> Alternate source routing, firewall and netfilter marking of packets:
>
>
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s 172.24.5.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 100 #
> iptables -t
On 05/03/2013 03:24 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 17:52 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
>
>> Curiously, at least one guy has reported success:
>
>> http://sysadminsjourney.com/content/2009/04/15/doing-simple-source-policy-routing-centos/
>
On 05/02/2013 07:26 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
> But I'm trying to give my son a "cool-yet-kind-of-geeky" 13th
> Birthday Present..he hinted he liked the CentOS logo, but where
> would I find things that are branded with it?searching the web
> doesn't really help me much, o
On 05/02/2013 05:05 PM, Matt wrote:
> There is a unix command called repeat.
>
> repeat 10 some_command
>
> Basically repeats some command ten times. Is it available on Centos 6
> and what package provides it?
# yum whatprovides "*bin/repeat"
[snip]
No Matches found
HTH
signature.asc
Descr
On 05/02/2013 02:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>>> with its default gateway pointing toward the ISP handling it. DNS
>>> service is simple enough to have standalone servers for each instance
>>> you need.
>
On 05/02/2013 01:05 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Michael Mol
> wrote:
>>
>> Ultimately, for this to work cleanly, anything which requires a
>> public IP (be it a raw authoritative DNS server or a load balancer)
>> will require an IP o
On 05/02/2013 05:13 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, I've gone that deep. And a tad deeper. I had almost *everything*
>> working by hand, and went to figure out how to convert it to idomatic
>> CentOS network configuration scripts. And took my network down *three
>> times* because of the script
On 05/02/2013 01:01 AM, anax wrote:
> On 2013-05-01 22:05, Michael Mol wrote:
>> I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers
>> can exist on multiple subnets from multiple upstream providers.
>>
>> A rough diagram of the network layout
On 05/02/2013 08:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>
>> Intent is to maintain the old, slow (but has an SLA) connection as a
>> fallback, and migrate services to the new connection piecemeal.
>> Meanwhile, the same DNS s
On 05/01/2013 05:15 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:05 -0400, Michael Mol wrote:
>> I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers
>> can exist on multiple subnets from multiple upstream providers.
>
> Kinda curious w
I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers
can exist on multiple subnets from multiple upstream providers.
A rough diagram of the network layout:
ISP1 router (blackbox, routes subnet A, address on subnet A)
\
---eth0(firewall)eth1---((servers))
/
ISP2 r
On 04/24/2013 12:46 PM, Matt wrote:
> I have setup a CentOS 6.3 VPS with ONLY IPv6 access simply for testing
> at this point. It browses the Internet with lynx fine on most major
> sites that are IPv6 enabled. Yum does not seem to work though.
> Always tries to connect to an IPv4 mirror and gives
On 04/23/2013 09:42 PM, Clint Dilks wrote:
> Hi Bruce
>
>>From your message I am assuming that either you installed MySQL yourself or
> had some do it for you?
>
> Is the mysql database currently running? If not it should be.
> Are you able to access the database using the command line tools ?
On 04/22/2013 08:42 AM, James Pearson wrote:
> We've come across a problem with 6.4 kernels that we didn't have with
> 6.2 kernels - which involves writing to a symlink that is on a read-only
> file system - but the symlink lands on a read-write file system
>
> The following shows the issue:
>
On 04/16/2013 01:37 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have 2 NICS in this system. CentOS 6.4
>
> eth0 is the virtual IP from PFSense mapping connected to the router, works
> fine.
>
> eth1 is a second NIC that I have assigned a private IP to and connected it
> to a switch on the
On 04/10/2013 09:58 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have been tied up with other work and Holidays. Now back to some
> server work that is long overdue. I lost an old server yesterday so it
> is crunch time.
>
> I believe my new platform is suppose to be an x86_64. The order form
> says 64 b
On 04/10/2013 10:15 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 10:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Michael Mol wrote:
>>> So I have a couple patches supplied to me by upstream in relation to a
>>> kernel bug[1], but I can't figure out how to patch the kernel. Th
On 04/10/2013 10:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Michael Mol wrote:
>> So I have a couple patches supplied to me by upstream in relation to a
>> kernel bug[1], but I can't figure out how to patch the kernel. The
>> CentOS wiki page discusses retrieving the ker
On 04/10/2013 09:45 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> So I have a couple patches supplied to me by upstream in relation to a
>> kernel bug[1], but I can't figure out how to patch the kernel. The
>> CentOS wiki page discu
So I have a couple patches supplied to me by upstream in relation to a
kernel bug[1], but I can't figure out how to patch the kernel. The
CentOS wiki page discusses retrieving the kernel source[2], but doesn't
describe how to apply patches. Instructions I've found apply to CentOS5,
and RH has chang
29 matches
Mail list logo
