Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and 2.6.18-92 Kernel backported SATA fixes?

2008-07-07 Thread Michael Rock
te: > From: Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and 2.6.18-92 Kernel backported SATA fixes? > To: centos@centos.org > Date: Monday, July 7, 2008, 10:31 AM > Michael Rock wrote on Mon, 7 Jul 2008 05:35:38 -0700 (PDT): > > > it showed >

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and 2.6.18-92 Kernel backported SATA fixes?

2008-07-07 Thread Michael Rock
--- On Mon, 7/7/08, Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 and 2.6.18-92 Kernel backported SATA fixes? > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Date: Monday, July 7, 2008, 7:01 AM > On Sun, 6 Jul

[CentOS] Centos 5.2 and 2.6.18-92 Kernel backported SATA fixes?

2008-07-06 Thread Michael Rock
Last year to get motherboards with the G33 chipset with SATA working with Centos I had to either use David Harbic fixes or use Fedora 8 since it had the later 2.6.25 kernel. I no longer see David's fixes available and also see in the 5.2 release notes "update SATA driver and infrastructure". D

[CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch

2007-10-27 Thread Michael Rock
Oops sorry, ugh another poor selection of words as I meant to say "When I saw the rest of my post snipped, I then realized that last request sounds really bad, which was not my intention. > When you snip the rest of my post man that last > request sounds really bad on its own. Sorry guys. I > saw

[CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch

2007-10-27 Thread Michael Rock
> WELCOME TO MY WORLD :D > (Hey, are the new foobar packages done, how about the xwyz packages) > Thanks, > JOhnny Hughes When you snip the rest of my post man that last request sounds really bad on its own. Sorry guys. I saw the "uploading the new DVD's" a few days ago and thought I would ask.

[CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch

2007-10-26 Thread Michael Rock
Michael Rock napsal(a): > all-generic-ide irqpoll > > Without irqpoll it just hangs and without > all-generic-ide it get a kernel panic. So I still > need both to recognize the disk and continue booting. > Michael, > I have tested 8.1.14 ICH9 x86_64 version and it's

[CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch

2007-10-24 Thread Michael Rock
David wrote: >I'll test DVD tomorrow. Today new kernel RPMS are > being built. What ptions are you talking about? > David all-generic-ide irqpoll Without irqpoll it just hangs and without all-generic-ide it get a kernel panic. So I still need both to recognize the disk and continue booting. __

[CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch

2007-10-24 Thread Michael Rock
btw - I installed your x86_64 rpms that has the ich9 patch directly on that box but it still will not boot without all the options. --- Michael Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David wrote: > > Now there are right md5sums and even > > x86_64 iso.delta. >

[CentOS] Re: CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-DVD-ich9.iso.delta md5 mismatch

2007-10-24 Thread Michael Rock
> David wrote: > Now there are right md5sums and even > x86_64 iso.delta. > David I tried using applydeltaiso and it creates a 2gb ISO but I notice it fails on applying. kdnssd-avahi-devel.i386: copying unchanged payload kernel-xen.x86_64 (???): applying delta new payload open failed _

[CentOS] Centos 5.0 Intel G33/P35 Chipset Support (Asus P5K-VM, P5KC)

2007-10-23 Thread Michael Rock
> 3) Kernel RPMS are here: > http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb/stable/i386/RPMS/repodata/ > 4) Well, maybe I could create CD install media deltas. > 5) And of course ICH9 patched CentOS is not supported by CentOS > team/community. > Regards, > David David, Do you think you can put up the x86_64 o

[CentOS] Centos 5.0 Intel G33/P35 Chipset Support (Asus P5K-VM, P5KC)

2007-10-22 Thread Michael Rock
So the update is not on any mirror or anywhere else besides Dave's site on DVD? In otherwords to fix this there is no choice but to reinstall from DVD or CD through his ISO? __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection

[CentOS] Centos 5.0 Intel G33/P35 Chipset Support (Asus P5K-VM, P5KC)

2007-10-22 Thread Michael Rock
> You might want to check out these threads: > http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=9585&forum=39 > and > http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=9667&forum=39 > > Akemi I do see the DVD image on David Hrbáè's website which I be

[CentOS] Centos 5.0 Intel G33/P35 Chipset Support (Asus P5K-VM, P5KC)

2007-10-22 Thread Michael Rock
I have 2 new boxes that I cannot use yet because of problems supporting these newer chipsets in 5.1. Does anyone know when the CD version of 5.0 x86-64 that has support for these chipsets be available on any on a Centos mirror? Has the support for these chipsets been added to yum yet? Here are

[CentOS] re: Intel G33 Compatibility for Centos Server

2007-10-08 Thread Michael Rock
John R Pierce >> that sounds more like a desktop system, not really >> what I'd consider >> server grade. no ECC support, no redundant power >> supplies, etc etc. Going this route has served me just as well for the last 3 years and at a cost I can afford. This is actually a major step up from

[CentOS] Intel G33 Compatibility for Centos Server

2007-10-08 Thread Michael Rock
Been running rock solid servers on Centos 3 and 4 for years but equipment is starting to die so it is time. I was thinking along the lines of an Intel Q6600 on an Asus P5K-VM mobo with the new G33 chipset utilizing SATA. Is anyone having success with this board or any of the G33 chipsets where I a