Re: [CentOS] centos 4.9 + ip6tables

2012-08-01 Thread Paul A
Thanks, I completely forgot about this. -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John Doe Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:33 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos 4.9 + ip6tables From: Paul A > Hi I have

[CentOS] centos 4.9 + ip6tables

2012-08-01 Thread Paul A
Hi I have an old server running centos 4.9 and recently I added ipv6 connectivity to it, however I wanted to use iptables to restrict access like im doing over ipv4. I tried using yum to install ip6tables but that's not available on the repo. I'm trying to figure out what my options are, how do you

[CentOS] FW: upgrade issue

2012-04-13 Thread Paul A
ntos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Paul A Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 3:41 PM To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] upgrade issue Mark, I used the centos repos, this server has centos 5.8. Iscsi will work on my previous kernel but not on the new one. I wanted

Re: [CentOS] upgrade issue

2012-04-13 Thread Paul A
: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 3:31 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] upgrade issue Paul A wrote: > Dale, I disabled it and the server came up but im seeing all sorts of > kernel error

Re: [CentOS] upgrade issue

2012-04-13 Thread Paul A
read_helper+0x7/0x10 Apr 13 15:21:31 bakup kernel: === -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Dale Dellutri Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 3:07 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] upgrade issue On

Re: [CentOS] upgrade issue

2012-04-13 Thread Paul A
e issue On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Paul A wrote: > I have an old dell 2450 that was running kernel 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 I > then upgraded it via yum to 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5. Now when the server > boots to the new kernel, 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 it hangs on "starting > iSCSI" a

[CentOS] upgrade issue

2012-04-13 Thread Paul A
I have an old dell 2450 that was running kernel 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 I then upgraded it via yum to 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5. Now when the server boots to the new kernel, 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 it hangs on "starting iSCSI" and the weird thing is when I tried to switch back to the older 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 kernel

Re: [CentOS] pam update

2011-07-06 Thread Paul A
Just notice that version of pam comes with pam_tally2 which supports what I want fyi. From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Paul A Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 4:47 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] pam update Hi, I'm currently

[CentOS] pam update

2011-07-05 Thread Paul A
Hi, I'm currently using, CentOS release 4.8 (Final) and wanted to update the pam_tally module to support unlock_time. I understand this is only support on centos 5.x and up. What are my options for updating pam_tally to support unlock_time, can I simply download and update from a centos repo or s

Re: [CentOS] apache 2 and php 5.2

2011-02-16 Thread Paul A
2 and php 5.2 On Wed, 16 Feb 2011, Paul A wrote: > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > From: Paul A > Subject: Re: [CentOS] apache 2 and php 5.2 > > Keith/guys thanks for the suggestions, here is what I have > found. It shows loaded config file is /etc/php.ini but if >

Re: [CentOS] apache 2 and php 5.2

2011-02-16 Thread Paul A
Keith/guys thanks for the suggestions, here is what I have found. It shows loaded config file is /etc/php.ini but if I remove that file and restart apache it still works. I also did as Keith suggested I removed a comment ';' and I got no errors apache started and it loaded the /etc/php.ini file. It

[CentOS] apache 2 and php 5.2

2011-02-15 Thread Paul A
Hi originally I installed php 4 on centos 5.5 and then a few repos including the remi repo to upgrade to php5, which seems to upgrade/work without any issues. However when I make a change to the /etc/php.ini file it doesn't look like apache is seeing it, for example if I change the post_max_size a

Re: [CentOS] cloning a server

2011-01-20 Thread Paul A
I was looking into this, creating my own rpms and using kickstart. Thanks for all the info guys. Paul Spiro Harvey wrote: >> Basically I want to clone this server and make it easy to install on >> another similar hardware server without having to install centos and >> then manually installin

Re: [CentOS] bash_logout

2009-04-01 Thread Paul A
Thanks chris! -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Christoph Neuhaus Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:35 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] bash_logout > Hi, I was searching for the system wide bash_logout and

[CentOS] bash_logout

2009-04-01 Thread Paul A
Hi, I was searching for the system wide bash_logout and couldn't find any documentation on it. If I create a file ~/.bash_logout file it gets executed when the user logs out but when I create a system wide /etc/bash_logout it doesn't work. Not what the issue is since I couldn't find anything on t

[CentOS] freeradius DNIS

2008-10-23 Thread Paul A
Not sure if this is off topic but I installed freeradius with yum on centos 5 and I'm hoping someone has some advice on getting DNIS proxy working In the acct_users file I have DEFAULT Called-Station-Id == "5500", Proxy-To-Realm := "xxx" Fall-Through = yes In the proxy file I have r

RE: [CentOS] Bind Firewall Rules

2008-07-23 Thread Paul A
Correct me if I'm wrong but from my understanding doesn't the new BIND randomize outgoing source ports only? - If so then if you have your firewall to allow established connections you should be all set. P.A > -Original Message- P.A > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On P.

RE: [CentOS] BIND.named failed to start

2008-02-20 Thread Paul A
What does /var/log/messages tell you? Most likely it's a named.conf issue. Thanks, Paul _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ??? Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 2:22 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] BIND.named failed to start

RE: [CentOS] named dead but subsys locked

2008-02-19 Thread Paul A
bject: Re: [CentOS] named dead but subsys locked P.A > P.A > On Feb 19, 2008 10:42 AM, Paul A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: P.A > > P.A > > P.A > > P.A > > Hi I recently compliled Bind 9.4.2 on P.A > > P.A > > CentOS release 5 (Final) 2.6.18-53.1.13.el

[CentOS] named dead but subsys locked

2008-02-19 Thread Paul A
Hi I recently compliled Bind 9.4.2 on CentOS release 5 (Final) 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 #1 SMP I compiled named chroot, I have done this on several other centos 4 server with no issues however on this centos 5 server im seeing [EMAIL PROTECTED] named]# service named status named dead but subsys lock

RE: [CentOS] centos 4.6 and openssl

2008-02-01 Thread Paul A
Behalf Of Alex White P.A > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 1:13 PM P.A > To: CentOS mailing list P.A > Subject: Re: [CentOS] centos 4.6 and openssl P.A > P.A > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:49:10 -0500 P.A > "Paul A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and scr

[CentOS] centos 4.6 and openssl

2008-02-01 Thread Paul A
Hi, I was compiling a new version of bind on my centos 4.6 server and I discovered that the openssl version (openssl-0.9.7a-43.17.el4_6.1) has several exploits associated with it. I was wondering aside from removing the RPM and compiling a new version of openssl how can I upgrade my current opens