Re: [CentOS] Where to change login screen options

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Wes James wrote: > I've looked around in the menus and googled this, but I can't find a way > to make the login require a username instead of just showing the available > users to select from. Where do I change this? I'm using CentOS 6.5. > > Thanks, > > -wes >

Re: [CentOS] chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6

Is this legit? Anyone try this build? On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:03 PM, ngeorgop wrote: > *New version of chromium (33.0.1750.152)*Build by me :-)i686 > chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6.i686.rpm > SRPM > chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6.sr

Re: [CentOS] about new Centos SIG distro releases

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Do keep in mind that the article in question was written by a tech > journalist > and includes independent analysis and opinion. It isn't direct > communication > from Red Hat or CentOS. > Yes, I see that now. Is the talk by Karsten Wad

Re: [CentOS] about new Centos SIG distro releases

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > On 03/31/2014 08:16 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 03/31/2014 07:28 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote: > >>> Init

Re: [CentOS] about new Centos SIG distro releases

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > On 03/31/2014 07:28 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote: > > Initial reaction: Crap! > > > > One of the best things about CentOS, in my opinion, was not having to > deal > > with all the different RHEL builds/relea

Re: [CentOS] about new Centos SIG distro releases

Initial reaction: Crap! One of the best things about CentOS, in my opinion, was not having to deal with all the different RHEL builds/releases/whatever they called them, and just having ONE distribution. So much for that. It didn't take long for Red Hat to get their mitts all over CentOS, huh?

Re: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore? And, would > you care strongly if it went away (or would you just migrate to something > else)? > > I bring this up because we are discussing dropping it from Fedora. This > wou

Re: [CentOS] suggestions for large filesystem server setup (n * 100 TB)

I'd highly recommend getting a NetApp storage device for something that big. It's more expensive up front, but the amount of heartache/time saved in the long run is WELL worth it. On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator < goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de> wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/06/2014 10:41 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Fabian Arrotin > > wrote: > > > >> On 06/02/14 16:26, Phelps, Matt wrote: > >>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:30 AM,

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

On Feb 8, 2014 1:41 AM, "Lists" wrote: > > On 02/06/2014 08:41 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote: > > Of course we already have notified Google. > > > > I was hoping for a little more granularity. Google is a large place; as is > > Red Hat I know. There was word t

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 06/02/14 16:26, Phelps, Matt wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Robert Arkiletian > wrote: > > > >> new potential remote code exploit in Chromium flash. > >> > http://googlechromerele

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > new potential remote code exploit in Chromium flash. > http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.ca/2014/02/stable-channel-update.html > > Doesn't look like these repos are being updated. > http://people.redhat.com/tpopela/rpms/ > http://peop

Re: [CentOS] librsvg2 update problem - nautilus segfault

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg < nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr> wrote: > > > On 02/04/2014 10:32 PM, Phelps, Matt wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > >> FYI: > >> > >> https://bugzilla.redh

Re: [CentOS] librsvg2 update problem - nautilus segfault

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > FYI: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061085 > > > On 02/04/2014 07:24 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote: > > > > op 04-02-14 14:03, Bane Ivosev schreef: > >> after morning update of librsvg2 > >> > >> Feb 04 09:39:15 Updated: librsvg2-2

Re: [CentOS] nautilus[3920]: segfault ( used to be : Re: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:0127 Moderate CentOS 6 librsvg2 Update )

Yes, it's a bug. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924414 Fixed upstream. On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote: > > op 04-02-14 11:03, Johan Vermeulen schreef: > > op 04-02-14 06:35, Johnny Hughes schreef: >

Re: [CentOS] Booting problem after update, how to track order of starting services

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Hi. > > I have updated system/server that worked for a long time. It was upgrade > from 6.4 to latest. > > After restart, system freezes after most/all of the daemons are booted. > > From interactive mode I found out that services star

Re: [CentOS] Most efficient way to create a CentOS 3 test VM

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:32 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 11/26/2013 12:00 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> It seems wasteful to install the last published version of the OS, then >> scp over my local update RPMs, freshen from those,*then* check with the >> vault for yet more updates. >> >> What I'm h

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 11/22/2013 01:25 PM, Chris Beattie wrote: >> On 11/22/2013 11:29 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote: >>> Most of us using CentOS/RHEL are in an "e"nterprise environment where >>> that sort of thing just isn&#x

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Chris Beattie wrote: > On 11/21/2013 11:40 AM, Darr247 wrote: >> On 2013-11-21 @14:41 zulu, Wes James scribed: >>> It is with the script on this page: >>> >>> http://chrome.richardlloyd.org.uk/ >> >> Be aware some on this list consider that script "criminal." > >

Re: [CentOS] Google Chrome

Most of us using CentOS/RHEL are in an "e"nterprise environment where that sort of thing just isn't allowed. A supported, updated, secured version of chrome/chromium is essential for our CentOS environment, and I venture to guess many others' (including RHEL users). On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:22

Re: [CentOS] No more support for chrome/chromium on rhel6

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/02/2013 10:50 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > > Johnny, > > > > there is someone here > > > > https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=227320 > > > > who is willing and able to help. > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:48 PM, J

Re: [CentOS] Backup of large filesystems >500GB

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Keith Keller < kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: > On 2013-05-27, Mike Watson wrote: > > I've a small system that I use to support a number of churches. I > > provide web and email for them. My current server is running CentOS 6.3 > > with paired 1TB driv

Re: [CentOS] Frustrated. Java on Centos 6 doesn't give an error message when downloading from a Samsung Galaxy S3

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Rock wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:03:52 -0700, Craig White wrote: > > > I think most people are using cloud storage with the smart phones these > days > > I understand. > > Anyway, here's a summary for the next person with this same problem > (Note: This affec