On Jan 10, 2012, at 7:51 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I've been getting a few avahi-daemon errors in /var/log/messages, eg
> ---
> Jan 11 00:40:24 helen avahi-daemon[12732]: Invalid query packet.
>
> Jan 1
On Jan 6, 2012, at 10:35 AM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
>
> I tried that and it worked -- the httpd processes are now listed with
> "httpd_t" as their context, the /var/log/audit/audit.log file is listed
> with auditd_log_t as its type instead if file_t, etc.
>
> I'm pretty sure this machine was
On Jan 5, 2012, at 7:37 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On 1/5/2012 3:14 PM, RILINDO FOSTER wrote:
>> On Jan 5, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 01/05/2012 04:36 PM,
On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:40 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
> Le ven 06 jan 2012 04:21:14 CET, Bennett Haselton a écrit:
>
>> On 1/6/2012 4:11 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
>>> Le ven 06 jan 2012 02:41:02 CET, Bennett Haselton a écrit:
>>>
On 1/6/2012 2:24 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
> Apache runni
On Jan 5, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/05/2012 04:36 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux says: "Access is only allowed
>> between similar types, so Apache running as httpd_t can read
>> /var/w
On Jan 2, 2012, at 9:30 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On 1/2/2012 9:18 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Bennett Haselton
>> wrote:
>>> I tried SELinux but it broke so much needed functionality on the server
>>> that it was not an option.
>> Pretty much all of the stock
On Jan 2, 2012, at 9:37 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On 1/2/2012 9:18 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> There have been many, many vulnerabilities that permit local user
>> privilege escalation to root (in the kernel, glibc, suid programs,
>> etc.) and there are probably many we still don't know about.
On Jan 1, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 5:33 PM, RILINDO FOSTER wrote:
>
>> ≈On Jan 1, 2012, at 8:24 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Rilindo Foster wrote:
>>>
>>>>
≈On Jan 1, 2012, at 8:24 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Rilindo Foster wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 1, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Bennett Haselton
>> wrote:
>>
>>> (Sorry, third time -- last one, promise, just giving it a subjec
On Jan 1, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> (Sorry, third time -- last one, promise, just giving it a subject line!)
>
> OK, a second machine hosted at the same hosting company has also apparently
> been hacked. Since 2 of out of 3 machines hosted at that company have now
> been hac
here an exploit in the wild could be used to break into a machine; in
> particular he said:
>
> "For example, there was a while back ( ~march ) a kernel exploit that
> affected CentOS / RHEL. The patch came after 1-2 weeks of the security
>
You can run this:
Destroy vmname
This is an equivalent to powering off the server.
Obviously, this may cause some issues with vm when you start it up again. . .
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 14, 2011, at 11:47 AM, "James B. Byrne" wrote:
> I am in the middle of a rather confusing situation. At
Somebody could correct me, but if the installed Centos install is on a ext4
file system, then the installed version of grub needs to support it. Which
version of grub are you running and from which distro?
- Rilindo Foster
http://monzell.com
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/rilindo-foster/2/b32/43b
On Dec 4, 2011, at 11:40 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> I installed C 6.0 in an empty partition. It functioned.
>
> Despite using the usually successful methods of booting into another
> operating system from C 5.7, I can't get into C 6.0
>
> Tried:-
>
> title C6-0 (2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64)
>
>
http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/i386/CentOS-6.0-i386-LiveDVD.iso
http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/i386/CentOS-6.0-i386-netinstall.iso
On Dec 4, 2011, at 5:52 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> On 3/12/11 22:13, "RILINDO FOSTER" wrote:
>
>> Here is o
Here is one for the net install:
http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-netinstall.iso
And for the live media:
http://www.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/centos/6.0/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-LiveCD.iso
Alternatively, there is always bit torrent.
On Dec 3, 2011, at 5:
Have you thought about installing it from the network? Just burn a net
install.iso, boot off from there, and at the network install prompt, enter path
one of the mirrors.
After that, you are set.
On Dec 3, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Beartooth wrote:
>
> I haven't managed to get hold of any DVD-R
No ideas yet, but let me ask this: if you boot into rescue mode mode with a
CentOS 6 disk, what happens if you were modify partitions and format the file
systems within the shell?
It would be interesting to see if you were to get a kernel panic at that point
or not.
- Rilindo Foster
http
On Aug 21, 2011, at 3:56 PM, David wrote:
> At 12:32 PM 8/21/2011, you wrote:
>> Well, can we verify whether the sent mail generated in the
>> /var/log/mail.log? Also, (assuming that you are running Postfix), I
>> assume that the configuration are identical on both 32-bit and
>> 64-bit systems
Well, can we verify whether the sent mail generated in the /var/log/mail.log?
Also, (assuming that you are running Postfix), I assume that the configuration
are identical on both 32-bit and 64-bit systems, right?
On Aug 21, 2011, at 3:23 PM, david wrote:
> Folks
>
> Logwatch is doing its thing
You'll have to hope that ssh does not reside on the same file system that has
errors.
You probably better off getting a remote access card or a terminal that allows
you to console into the server - sort of like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dell_DRAC
On Jul 15, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Les Mike
On Jun 4, 2011, at 4:27 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> RILINDO FOSTER wrote:
>> Okay, it took a few minutes, but I figure it out. Seems that Scientific
>> Linux eems to regress a bit in this area.
>> SL Box (mounting Centos box via NFS4):
>>
>> 1
On Jun 4, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 23:49 -0400, RILINDO FOSTER wrote:
>> Okay, it took a few minutes, but I figure it out. Seems that Scientific
>> Linux eems to regress a bit in this area.
>>
>> With Centos, you need to
/mnt nfs4 rw,addr=192.168.15.100 0
SL Box (mounting Centos box via NFS4):
192.168.15.200:/ /mnt nfs4 rw,addr=192.168.15.200,clientaddr=192.168.15.100 0 0
Huh.
Thanks a lot for the pointers, guys. It has been interesting. :)
On Jun 2, 2011, at 8:50 PM, RILINDO FOSTER wrote:
> Here you
Here you go. Nothing too fancy:
[root@centos ~]# cat /etc/exports
/home *(ro,sync)
/opt/company_data *(rw,sync)
On Jun 2, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 14:01 -0400, RILINDO FOSTER wrote:
>> It is actually commented out in SL6.
>>
>>
I did that. It didn't help. :(
On Jun 2, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:01 PM, RILINDO FOSTER wrote:
>> On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> I was asking about "Domain" in "idmapd.conf" because there
It is actually commented out in SL6.
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:56 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:53 PM, RILINDO FOSTER wrote:
>> On May 30, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> Are the values of "Domain" in "/etc/idmapd.conf&
=192.168.15.100 0 0
(Of course, it could be that SL6 did things a little differently with their
distro's implementation of NFS4, but I doubt it).
On May 30, 2011, at 10:29 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:31 PM, RILINDO FOSTER wrote:
>>
>> After getting a reasonably c
After getting a reasonably configured NFS4 setup working on my Scientific Linux
server, I spent a majority of my evening trying to do the same with my Centos 5
box, with fruitless results. Most attempts to mount that server returns the
following message:
[root@sl01 log]# mount -t nfs4 192.168.1
29 matches
Mail list logo
