> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/
Thank you!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello all,
I'm trying to install mod_python from the normal channels via RPM,
though it seems that download.fedora.redhat.com is down, or moved?
DNS reports it does not exist.
I've seen multiple references to this domain name including on the site:
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/1528
> Since the RHCE exam is based on RHEL, that would be the best OS to work
> with. If you don't want to shell out the money for RHEL, then CentOS 5
> would be the next choice.
>
> --
> Bowie
>Agree 150%.
I agree also. I'm going along the same self-taught path using CentOS
5.5, lurking and absorbi
> I was loading centos in two other identical
> servers today and was having such a hard time loading it from DVD, DVD
> appears to be crashing, I even re-downloaded the image 3 times from three
> different mirrors and burn them with different applications
You know, I was having the same exact iss
>> http://thecloudmarket.com/stats#/by_platform_definition
>
> Not sure I understand it... esp. since it lists "linux" as less than
> ubuntu, and more than CentOS
>
> mark
I'm guessing "linux" is an average of all of the flavors there so you
can compare "linux" with something like win
FWIW, I have a netbook (Windows 7) which does something interesting. I
bring it up because it is something that may be applicable to CentOS.
There is a tunneling pseudo-interface which is only IPv6; it has two
addresses, the IPv6 address, and a local-link IPv6 address. The hardware
interfaces als
This is wonderful! Thank you very much!
Rob
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2010/12/1 Rob Del Vecchio :
> > Since the "SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!" thread is
> deep
> > in heated discussion, I decided not to derail to
Since the "SELinux - way of the future or good idea but !!!" thread is deep
in heated discussion, I decided not to derail to ask a simple question.
I found this guide for SELinux: http://www.linux-books.us/centos_0005.php and
it looks like it's straight out of RedHat.
However, it's dated 2005. W
> it may be that grub was not installed.
I agree; also double check that the drive you installed CentOS on is the
drive that you're booting from?
> I've (so far) installed with the default disk layout and package
selection.
You may want to try specifying a /boot partition.
If all else fails, I'
> Now I'm struggling with the seemingly simple problem
Sometimes simple problems have simple solutions!
For example:
> # ls -al Alex.html index.php hello-world.php
> -r--r--r-- 1 rootroot 599 Sep 29 15:49 Alex.html
> -rw-r--r-- 1 afarber afarber 33 Jul 29 11:32 hello-world.php
> -rw-r--
Sorry, should have googled before mailing; looks like it can be fixed with
grub-install. Hopefully smooth sailing from here.
Thanks for the help thus far,
Rob
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Used a kickstart script to install the system, got slightly different
results.
Upon boot, I see:
L 99 99 99 ... 99
and so on. This could be due to a correctly configured BIOS (set to AHCI).
However, the installation boots when the installation disk finds an
installed copy of CentOS on the hard d
> Also please note that if that card has SATA 2.0 capacity, native mode is
probably named
> "AHCI" on the bios.
Indeed! There is an AHCI option. I will set that.
Thanks for the info,
Rob
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.or
> Well I'd wipe the drive clean using Gparted with a cross
> format. Do a minimal kickstart installation to install GRUB
> on the MBR.
I've read a bit on kickstart installations, and now I get to delve deeper
:)
Thanks for the advice!
> Can't you put the SATA drive on native instead of IDE in yo
Update: on a hunch, I tried installing Ubuntu Server. Interestingly, the
GRUB installation failed during setup, however the LILO installation
completed successfully, the Ubuntu installation boots correctly.
For me, the whole reason to start using CentOS was to move away from Ubuntu.
I could do 3
Hello all,
I am attempting to install CentOS 5.5 on a recently donated home server (was
Windows). I've tried installing twice; first, separating /boot, swap, /,
/var, /usr and /home into different partitions, the second time choosing
default layout. Both times have resulted in "GRUB Hard Disk Err
> yum check-update does not report that there is a more recent openssh
> available. Odd.
Clear your yum cache? Since you used yum to update the package in the first
place, yum may have stored that "I already downloaded this" data somewhere.
FYI, I am not experienced in yum specifically (debian
17 matches
Mail list logo
