On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:33 PM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
I have been working off and on with Xen and KVM on a couple of test
hosts for that past year or so and while now everything seems to
function as expected, more or less, I find myself asking the
question: Why?
We run
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you leave memtest86+ running for 2 days? I thought 1 or 2 cycles
would be good enough?
I'm hoping to pick-up the server in the next 2 hours then I can see
what happens when I run memtest86+ or other tests
Yes,
It has been a few days so I am sending this again incase someone has
seen this issue and might have a seen this problem or has a suggestion
of where to look and why it might not be taking these settings with
5.2 when it did with 5.1
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Rob Lines [EMAIL PROTECTED
We were previously running 5.1 x86_64 and recently updated to 5.2
using yum. Under 5.1 we were having problems when running jobs using
torque and the solution had been to add the following items to the
files noted
* softmemlock unlimited in /etc/security/limits.conf
session
I am looking for an app that would run from the terminal and would emulate a
bash shell (or pass everything to the shell) that would allow me to set a
log file and then record all my input and the output to the screen from the
commands. As an added bonus if it would allow me to run it from two
I am using autofs for a number of machines connecting nfs shares. All the
mount and unmount log entries on the server are being saved to
/var/log/messages currently. This is becoming a bit of a pain because as
the number of hosts increase and various monitoring scripts check to be sure
that they
I had a thread on this a bit back here is the set of instructions that I
ended up using:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-January/074771.html
Here is my follow up to it with additions as we were not using IPX:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-April/078492.html
The
On Feb 4, 2008 10:38 PM, Scott Ehrlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've priced some 1 and 2U Dell servers. Now, I'd like to perform a price
comparison of COTS hardware for 1 and 2U servers. What VAR companies do
people
recommend I check out for putting machines together? I'm perfectly
I have just finished creating an array on our new enclosure and our CentOS 5
server has recognized it. It shows as the full 6tb in the LSI configuration
utility as well as when I ran fdisk:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin]# fdisk /dev/sdb
Note: sector size is 2048 (not 512)
The number of cylinders for
On Feb 4, 2008 3:34 PM, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Lines wrote:
On Feb 4, 2008 3:16 PM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with LVM, you could join several smaller logical
drives, maybe 1TB each,
into a single volume set, which could then contain
On Feb 4, 2008 3:16 PM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with LVM, you could join several smaller logical drives, maybe 1TB each,
into a single volume set, which could then contain various file systems.
That looks like it may be the result. The main reason was to keep the
amount of
This would appear to be your problem. Unless you have strong reasons to
use 2K sectors, I'd change them to the much more standard 512.
After that, parted should have no issues whatsoever.
In looking back through the configuration. The 2kb sectors were set in the
Array in the Variable
On Feb 4, 2008 4:49 PM, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:To
move an external array to a new server is as easy as plugging
it in and importing the volume group (vgimport).
Typically I name my OS volume groups CentOS and give
semi-descriptive names to my external array volume groups,
While this is not a problem with CentOS I am hoping to solve the situation
using a CentOS machine. For anyone not interested I am sorry to clutter
your mail box. For everyone else any ideas or suggestions are welcome.
A bit of background:
We have an application that runs only in DOS 6.22 at
Sorry for the delay. I have been out of the office for a few days.
On Dec 5, 2007 10:11 PM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Lines wrote:
We are preparing for a new file server (Dell 2970) with an external
disk array with integrated RAID (raidking.com http://raidking.com
We went really simple with all the rsync commands being run from the same
machine. We point all the output from the rsync to a log file in /var/log
and then I usually just tail the file on a daily basis. Also if it runs
into actual errors cron ends up mailing directly.
We use this on our
On 7/24/07, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesse Cantara wrote:
So basically, what I can figure from all of the evidence at this point
is the problem is either:
default configuration of the network in CentOS isn't proper for what
I'm doing (can't handle the traffic or number of
17 matches
Mail list logo
