On Apr 9, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
Just one thing: THANK YOU ALL!!!
Thanks a lot!
(especially for focusing on 5.6 before 6.0)
+1
--
Ryan Ordway E-mail: rord...@oregonstate.edu
Unix Systems Administrator rord...@library.oregonstate.edu
On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:26 AM, David Brian Chait wrote:
If Karanbir says 3 weeks it takes 3 months. (as well as with CentOS 5.6)
Well that and we have been a few days away from 5.6 for well over a few
months now...
I didn't realize it was already CentOS bashing day... oh, it's just Monday.
) and services. If you have
control over your own DNS you can manage your zone's Time To Live so that
records are less aggressively cached, etc.
--
Ryan Ordway E-mail: rord...@oregonstate.edu
Unix Systems Administrator rord...@library.oregonstate.edu
OSU Libraries
Source project that upstream draws from... in which case
perhaps you could use some of that time contributing to CentOS. Problem solved.
--
Ryan Ordway E-mail: rord...@oregonstate.edu
Unix Systems Administrator rord...@library.oregonstate.edu
OSU Libraries
On Jan 9, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Ryan Ordway wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:
Ryan Ordway wrote:
I had been running CentOS 5 happily on my Sun Fire X4200 M2 systems,
then I upgraded the BIOS and iLOM firmware. Now I'm running into
what
seems to be a fairly common problem
in the mainline kernel, and if
so if this can be integrated into the CentOS 5.1 kernel (namely the
CentOS Plus kernel)?
Thanks!
Ryan
--
Ryan Ordway E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unix Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSU Libraries, Corvallis, OR 97331
On Jan 9, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:
Ryan Ordway wrote:
I had been running CentOS 5 happily on my Sun Fire X4200 M2 systems,
then I upgraded the BIOS and iLOM firmware. Now I'm running into what
seems to be a fairly common problem with newer motherboards. I cannot
boot unless I use
there had it running in
production. But, while it's not officially supported they do their
best to make it work.
Specifically, what makes you say it is a 5.1 only feature? What does
5.1 give you that makes it easier than 5.0?
Ryan
--
Ryan Ordway E-mail: [EMAIL
and the master B's view. You lose any changes to
the data on master B. It would be nice to be able to merge any changes
from B that hadn't made their way to master A yet. At that point
you're examining binlogs.
Ryan
--
Ryan Ordway E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unix Systems
On Dec 11, 2007, at 2:44 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Ryan Ordway wrote:
Specifically, what makes you say it is a 5.1 only feature? What
does 5.1
give you that makes it easier than 5.0?
specifically - rbr
Ahh, true.
( i think were just tryign to use mysql like too much of a real
10 matches
Mail list logo
