On 01.03.2012 09:44, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> Let me try to unconfuse this situation:
>
> 1) CentOS-6 does not use initramfstools, mkinitrd is just a thin shell wrapper
> on top of dracut
>
> 2) dracut by default adds lots of drivers to the initramfs (not only what's
> needed, that is, -H is not t
On 23.02.2012 14:25, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 09:52:54 AM Volker Poplawski wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm booting Centos6 from a usb 3.0 stick.
>>
>> This works fine as long as the usb-stick is connected to a usb 2.0 port.
>> O
Hi all,
I'm booting Centos6 from a usb 3.0 stick.
This works fine as long as the usb-stick is connected to a usb 2.0 port.
Once I plug the the usb-stick into a blue usb 3.0 port centos fails on
mounting the root filesystem.
Any hints on that?
Regards
.Volker
_
On 26.09.2011 14:40, John Doe wrote:
> From: Volker Poplawski
>
>> I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel
>> 82574L gigabit nics on Centos 6.
>
> I had pbms with my Intel 1000e too.
> Installed elrepo's kmod-e1000e and so far so go
On 23.09.2011 16:42, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 09/23/2011 04:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Volker Poplawski wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel
>>> 82574L gigabit nics on Centos
Hi all,
I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel
82574L gigabit nics on Centos 6.
The device eth0 suddenly stops working i.e. no more networking. When I
do ifconfig from console I get
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:xx:xx:xx:xx:EA
inet6 addr: fe80
On 19.09.2011 23:48, Robert Spangler wrote:
> On Monday 19 September 2011 11:04, the following was written:
>
>> So
>> How do you specifiy the order in which NICs are enumerated?
>> or at least how to tell centos to stop messing with the
>> 70-persistent-net.rules?
>
> Add the hardware
I have installed Centos 6 on a server with two NICs. It so happens that
the NIC with the lower ARP adr is assigned 'eth1' and the NIC with the
higher ARP 'eth0'. (Not sure if this a bug but it is at least inconvenient)
I have modified the udev rules in
/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
b
On 04/18/2011 06:52 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Actually I'm trying to figure out where these lines originate from
>
> I see
>
>> Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.86989
>> + umask 022
>> + cd /home/user/rpmbuild/BUILD
>> + LANG=C
>> + export LANG
>>
>> The setting of LANG messes up
On 04/18/2011 06:15 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> in which file is the %prep script defined?
>
> Defined in the spec file.
You're right.
Actually I'm trying to figure out where these lines originate from
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.86989
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/user/rpmbuild/B
Hi all,
in which file is the %prep script defined?
www.rpm.org says its a build-in script. Does that mean its defined in
some binary? I wonder how %prep handles the setup of locale.
TIA
.Volker
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lis
11 matches
Mail list logo
