Thanks for the responses everyone. Yes ELRepo not EPEL... Guess I just
need to read more carefully. So used to EPEL it didn't even occur to me
they were stipulating a different repo.
William
On 9/20/20 3:14 AM, Phil Perry wrote:
> On 20/09/2020 04:16, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Sat, S
tated otherwise. If anyone knows if there is a solution for
CentOS 8 that would be great or if I have to roll back to CentOS 7 for
card support.
Thanks,
William
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
What happened to the openvswitch package on centos 7? It no longer seems to
be in the standard repositories.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
how that occurred but it did work.
Thanks Much!
Bill
On 1/16/19, 10:32 MST, "James Pearson" wrote:
Capehart, William J wrote:
>
> I am working on bringing back a number of Centos 7 rigs in our
> student computer lab back online. No change was made to the ex
Hi All.
I am working on bringing back a number of Centos 7 rigs in our student computer
lab back online. No change was made to the existing server machine [running
Scientific Linux 6]
Right now there is one remaining thing to resolve: an inconsistency with the
rigs' NIS Clients.
I have co
Use Rufus if you are creating from windows workstation. https://rufus.akeo.ie/
Sent from my iPhone
On May 16, 2018, at 10:23 PM, Yves Bellefeuille
mailto:y...@storm.ca>> wrote:
mailto:info...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
I need to copy CentOS 7 to a USB to boot from and install on
servers. I have searc
I would just buy a cloudkey and not have to bother installing the software
onto your machine directly. If you do not have a power over ethernet
switch you'll need a micro USB cable and power supply adapter to run it but
after that it takes care of running your software for you you don't have to
in
Sometimes in bios it is called legacy mode
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 15, 2018, at 5:31 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>> On 15 February 2018 at 17:19, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
>> I have a UEFI system, but I want to install CentOS on a MBR (not GPT)
>> hard disk.
>>
>> The installation p
That is not a concern. Ryzen is already taking the desktop market by
storm. Ryzen is not an Intel design. Intel excels in single threaded
performance and does very well in multi-thread workloads. Ryzen so far is
at least 20 percent faster in multi-thread loads at the same price level.
Naples/Ry
Who do I contact about softwarecollections being offline? I am having
to bypass that repo for right now and the packets disappear in the ether
on their way..:)
William Warren
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman
Yes you would break all kinds of things. In a nutshell folks are saying
you are free to try but when it blows up...you better have a total backup
to restore the entire box. Your first priority should be getting whatever
is holding you back from proper system updates and security out of the way.
What constraint is requiring you to run a highly vulnerable server?
On Nov 8, 2016 00:34, "Dipal Bhatt" wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:12 PM, John R Pierce
> wrote:
>
> > On 11/7/2016 8:33 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote:
> >
> >> Unfortunately, there's not possibility in this specific situation to b
ed of UNIXes on one's own
;-)
Valeri
PS Sorry, folks, if the above hurts: sometimes whatever hurts helps you
most in a long run..
i.e.: that which does not kill us makes us stronger Preach it
*LOUD*, brother
--
Wil
amp; possibly others ? Would have made the
transition a bit gentler $0.02, no more, no less
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest impleme
117M 34% /boot
/dev/md3 ext41.8T 1.4T 333G 81% /home
[root@Q6600:/etc, Thu Aug 11, 08:26 AM] 1019 # uname -a
Linux Q6600 2.6.35.14-106.fc14.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Nov 23 13:07:52 UTC
2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@Q6600:/etc, Thu Aug 11, 08:26 AM]
I have been receiving a dribble of messages dated 6/4/16 this A.M.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
ever devi
, yum had associations which it was sad to lose.
Hear, hear
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
ever devi
disks ?
Thanks.
Is the disk or 1 of its partitions mounted ? If so, can it be unmounted
? $0.02, no more, no less
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implem
ALL systems need patching so obsessing about uptime is insecurity on its
face. It doe not matter if it is windows or linux or anything else.
On 4/30/2016 11:33 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sat, April 30, 2016 8:54 am, William Warren wrote:
uptime=insecurity.
This sounds like MS Windows
uptime=insecurity. Patches must be kept up these days or your uptime
won't matter when your server gets compromised.
On 4/22/2016 4:33 AM, Rob Townley wrote:
tune2fs against a LVM (albeit formatted with ext4) is not the same as
tune2fs against ext4.
Could this possibly be a machine where upt
, 3:31:58pm] 889 %
So FreeBSD does indeed appear to use the Almquist shell.
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
On 04/27/16 13:21, Pouar wrote:
On 04/27/16 08:49, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote:
On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:
Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated,
one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues
ere I know I will want to 'vi' something on
another box (I *love* rxvt otherwise). $0.02, no more, no less
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest i
actual Bourne shell
--
William A. Mahaffey III
--
"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
ever devised by man."
actually that isn't true either. Just install a newer version of
firefox or chrome or whatever..then you are independent of the operating
system in many cases.
On 3/26/2016 9:00 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 25.03.2016 17:29, Eero Volotinen wrote:
@Eero: IMHO you are missing some point
I have a new centos 6 install. Randomly i get out of memory messages and
my ssh file transfer dies. I have tried this in filezilla as well as
winscp. I have disabled motd in ssh and i also had entropy problems so i
enacted rngd -r /dev/urandom -o /dev/random but did not stop the out of
memory
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 2:43 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] nfs v3 issues on Centos 7
Morning
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Edsall, William (WJ)
wrote:
> Hello list,
> So I'm having a strange issue with Centos 7 mounting NFS V3.
>
>
As a first ste
unt.nfs: trying 143.219.41.19 prog 15 vers 3 prot UDP port 892
mount.nfs: mount(2): Input/output error
mount.nfs: mount system call failed
Thanks,
William
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> On 31 Jan 2015, at 07:43, Scott Robbins wrote:
>
> So, probably some of you, at least, follow Fedora, perhaps in part to see
> what new desktop user oriented decision will make it into the next version
> of RHEL/CentOS.
I'd be more worried about Fedora 21 workstation defaulting to having por
Hi,
I have a Centos7 host with libvirt, attempting to boot a Centos7 guest.
I am attempting to do the install over ipv6 (because why not).
I have the following network configuration.
Cisco 3550 gi0/1 <-> eno1 (Centos7) host.
gi0/1 is configured as:
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switc
And this little soap box has what to do with CentOS ?
On Oct 14, 2014, at 7:01 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 13:29 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> I apologize in advance for the subject and length of this reply. I debated
>> just letting things pass without comment.
Either is your paranoia……
On Oct 11, 2014, at 7:16 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 19:20 -0500, William Woods wrote:
>
>> Whats your mailing address, I will send you some
>> more tinfoil.
>
> I do hope you will be able to understand that
Whats your mailing address, I will send you some
more tinfoil.
On Oct 10, 2014, at 5:35 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 16:31 -0500, Chris Pemberton wrote:
>
>> Did either of you think to crack open your laptop cases and check for
>> embedded key logging hardware on the
0, 2014 1:07 pm, William Woods wrote:
>> Not at all, and please don’t tell me what I prefer, All I prefer is that
>> people try to be homiest, you are right all software has bugs, but to
>> imply in any way that
>> open source is better is a misnomer.
>>
>> I use
:33 pm, William Woods wrote:
>> So claim made, nothing to back it up. Got it.
>>
>> all I need to say is…BASH , OpenSSL…..
>>
>
> Nice examples. One-sided though. All software has bugs. You prefer
> security through obscurity (closed source, and you have to _tr
And you can make all the claims you want, without being willing to back them up.
On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:52 -0500, William Woods wrote:
>
>> I doubt you have been around longer than me, but not the point, nice
>&g
I see, so you can’t back up your claim….ok.
On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:33 -0500, William Woods wrote:
>
>> So claim made, nothing to back it up. Got it.
>
> You obviously didn't. Perhaps one day you may discove
Oh as a side note, that suggests nothing other than back up what you claim.
On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:01 -0500, William Woods wrote:
>
>> Really, you have some URL’s to back up the paranoia ?
>
> That suggests I
Learning wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:01 -0500, William Woods wrote:
>
>> Really, you have some URL’s to back up the paranoia ?
>
> That suggests I've been around a lot longer than you and appear, with
> some subjects, to know a little more than you. Ma
gt; On Fri, October 10, 2014 12:01 pm, William Woods wrote:
>> Really, you have some URL’s to back up the paranoia ?
>
> Well, that's the problem with closed source systems (Which MS Windows is
> and commercial antiviruses for it are). One can claim something and there
> is n
Really, you have some URL’s to back up the paranoia ?
On Oct 10, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:19 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> On Thu, October 9, 2014 21:11, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> On 10/9/2014 6:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
BTW, the whole i
Looks like I need my tin foil hat…..
On Oct 10, 2014, at 11:19 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Thu, October 9, 2014 21:11, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 10/9/2014 6:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> BTW, the whole idea of "antivirus" is flawed. It is based on "enumerate
>>> bad". You can't, as one
This
On Sep 29, 2014, at 10:00 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:54:45AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> Or the Oracle version that you can download should work too:
>> https://oss.oracle.com/el4/SRPMS-updates/bash-3.0-27.0.2.el4.src.rpm
>> or the equivalent binary rpm u
My mistake then, apologies.
On Sep 27, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2014-09-27 at 09:31 -0500, William Woods wrote:
>
>> 5.4 ? really…. 5.4 ? you have a lot of other issues to worry about.
>
> Not me. I'm on 5.10 and 6.5.
>
> The lady
5.4 ? REally 5.4….
You have lots of other issues to be concerned with.
On Sep 27, 2014, at 8:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 09/26/2014 06:23 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 01:29:44AM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>> 2014-09-27 0:42 GMT+03:00 Always Learning :
>>
> Sca
5.4 ? really…. 5.4 ? you have a lot of other issues to worry about.
On Sep 27, 2014, at 8:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 09/26/2014 06:23 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 01:29:44AM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>> 2014-09-27 0:42 GMT+03:00 Always Learning :
>>
> Scary s
5.4 ? really…. 5.4 ? you have a lot of other issues to worry about.
On Sep 27, 2014, at 8:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 09/26/2014 06:23 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 01:29:44AM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>> 2014-09-27 0:42 GMT+03:00 Always Learning :
>>
> Scary s
You are whining about something FREE…don’t like it, don’t use it….if you had a
PAID RHEL
sub, upstream to Cent, on then bitch…..but whining about something free, well
On Aug 23, 2014, at 8:38 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Sat, August 23, 2014 5:00 am, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
>> I hate networ
On Jul 19, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 11:10 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 07/19/2014 09:05 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>>> 4. Lack of knowledge about the replacement.
>
>> Well .. all of that may be true and systemd may be the devil ... but we
On Jul 19, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 09:08 +0300, Veli-Pekka Kestilä wrote:
>
>> It is actually funny how there seems to be so many opponents of systemd
>> who want back the old ways of doing things.
>
> These are the causes:-
>
> 1. Familiarity with
On Jul 14, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 12:02 -0500, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
>
>> 5.x is ancient and had its own set of flaws over its lifecycle.
>
> 1/3 of my servers use C 5.10, 2/3 use C 6.5. I use C 5.10 as my
> individual development server and
On Jul 14, 2014, at 11:19 AM, Andrew Wyatt wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:19 AM, wrote:
>
>> William Woods wrote:
>>
>> Please stop top posting.
>>>
>>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>> William Woods wro
On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> William Woods wrote:
>
> Please stop top posting.
>>
>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> William Woods wrote:
>>>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning
>>&
Like OpenSSL ?
On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> William Woods wrote:
>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>>>
>>>> Having been working with UNIX like syste
On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>
>> Having been working with UNIX like systems since 1985
>> my biggest complaint with systemd is it so intrusive, it wants to be
>> everything which makes
>> it vulnerable to bugs a
Hi all,
It is a DL380p G8
RAID controller is a HP Smart Array P420i Controller with firmware 4.66
running 6.5 on a HP DL380p G8 with a HP Smart Array P420i Controller with
firmware 4.66. I see these when the system boot. How can I fix this?
scsi: host 2 channel 0 id 0 lun4194304 has a LUN
It is a DL380p G8
RAID controller is a HP Smart Array P420i Controller with firmware 4.66
On Monday, March 3, 2014 2:28 PM, William Kwan wrote:
Hi all,
running 6.5 on a HP DL380p with a few logical drive created with the onboard
RAID. I see these when the system boot. How can I fix
Hi all,
running 6.5 on a HP DL380p with a few logical drive created with the onboard
RAID. I see these when the system boot. How can I fix this?
scsi: host 2 channel 0 id 0 lun4194304 has a LUN larger than allowed by the
host adapter
scsi: host 2 channel 0 id 0 lun4194560 has a LUN larger tha
e
files dropped in /etc/profile.d/vim.*:
$ which vi
alias vi='vim'
/usr/bin/vim
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ith all the bells etc.
>
> Thanks
>
> GM
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:02 PM, William Warren
> wrote:
>> On 8/13/2012 12:25 AM, Gregory Machin wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I'm look for an enterprise quality Anti-virus / Malware for my Linux
>
On 8/15/2012 3:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>> the only method I know that works consistently is to block all direct
>> web and ssl access and force use of a web proxy, so the SSL is between
>> the remote server and the proxy server, which is your security gateway.
> The way I've handled this in pre
On 8/13/2012 12:25 AM, Gregory Machin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm look for an enterprise quality Anti-virus / Malware for my Linux
> machines . Mostly Ubuntu on the desktop, CentOS and RHEL servers. I
> must have real time scanning, on demand scanning, and centralized
> management.
>
> Is there anything o
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> I've not broken the system, it's just I want to decide when
> the new kernel should be booted.
The edit the /etc/sysconfig/kernel file and tell the system not to
update the default kernel to the newly install one.
--
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
> Greetings,
> Are FASTTRACK updates delivered by way of a different repo?
Yes.
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories?action=show
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing li
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 15:48 +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> Am 01.07.2012 07:40, schrieb Les Mikesell:
> [distinction between /bin and /usr/bin]
> > The concept really comes from the original unix, which back in the
> > day, often had really tiny boot disks and might mount everything else
> > over t
//wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:26 AM, William Hooper wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:18 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> From: Prabhpal S. Mavi
>>> sorry to inform that following solutions did not solve the error "The
>>> requested URL was not found on this server&qu
/var/www/html/cacti/
>
> Why the /html/ in the middle?
I believe the OP stated that he installed Cacti into /var/www/html/cacti/ .
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
correctly.
> in the end to make it work, i have to leave the default DocumetRoot in
> httpd.conf to "/var/www/html" and crate virtual host for cacti and give
> it's DocumetRoot as following and everything is fine now.
That is also another way to handle it.
--
William H
php?f=2&t=46997
http://docs.cacti.net/manual:087:1_installation.9_pia#configuration
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
022775.html
http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=46997
http://docs.cacti.net/manual:087:1_installation.9_pia#configuration
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ll with all the updates applied.
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-6e2c3746ec45ac3142917466760321e868f43c0e
If installing new I would go with CentOS 6.2, unless there are
specific kernel requirements needed for third party modules.
--
William Hooper
___
kickstart files which can be used to
perform advanced configuring without the need for the GUI installer.
The official documentation is here:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installation_Guide/ch-guimode-x86.html#id4594292
--
Willi
archive, but try replacing the
first "@" with %40, like this:
http_proxy=http://asomavarapu%40actrec.gov.in:dbsa121@10.100.15.3:8080
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2007-September/044207.html
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing
On 3/25/2012 2:39 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ryan Wagoner wrote:
>
>> Additionally if your computer BIOS supports configuring the AC recovery
>> power mode to always on, the computer will start back up. Most default to
>> last state, which doesn't work as well since shutting down will power off
>>
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
> http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.9/RPMS-rhel5-x86_64/
>
> Maybe I'm missing something obvious here? If you needed to download a
> source rpm for postfix where would you go?
Looks like you want http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.9/SR
get a ups that has a usb connection. What you can do then is when you
loose power after x amount of time the ups software will gracefully
shutdown the server automatically. some ups software will even start
the server back up once a sufficient charge has been obtained.
On 3/24/2012 7:33 AM, T
ll. In fact, not
opening a direct port for VNC is a good way of enforcing the tunnel to
secure the connection.
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
, 2012 at 9:49 AM, William Warren
> > wrote:
> >> well ubuntu allows me to boot from MD RAID10...so there's something they
> >> are doing that allows that to boot.
> >
> > That ubuntu version has probably switched to grub2. Good luck
> > debugging it whe
is machine will
come back to centos6..:) Centos 6 is great but it's not right for this
particluar machine..:(
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:29 AM, William Warren
> wrote:
> > why will Centos 6 not boot from an mdraid 10 partition
why will Centos 6 not boot from an mdraid 10 partition?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
What's funny is WD is just being idiotic. Seagate does NOT have that
extended error checking. I have two barracuda green drives in an sbs 2k8
server on a sas 6 ir and they work perfectly.
On 2/29/2012 3:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Miguel Medalha wrote:
>> A few months ago I had an enormous
must do a 64-bit install to use KVM."
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS6
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
first off..if you are using the on bios raid turn it off. Secondly
black drives form WD intentionally put themselves into deep cycle diags
every so often. This makes them impossible to use in hardware and FRAID
setups. I have 4 of them in raid 10 under mdraid and i had to disable
bios raid f
On 2/2/2012 5:19 PM, Peter A wrote:
> On 02/02/12 17:01, William Warren wrote:
>> On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote:
>>> If you're worried about io reliability, then buy a (way more expensive)
>>> SLC drive, rather than the consumer level MLC... We have some SLC
On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote:
> On 02/02/12 14:05, Mike wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, William Warren wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
>>>> Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
>>>> SSD drives?
On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
> Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
> SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
> solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
> quickly in high I/O situations? Something like each m
full copy. Granted, it is
easier to manage if it is, and drive space is cheap.
> That is, that should have been a design goal for yum
> since that is the way people should manage multiple machines
Yum's design goal was/is to be a dep-solver, not a management system.
--
William H
of updating the local mirror
to really push any changes.
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 1/11/2012 6:42 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Rilindo Foster wrote:
>
>>> So I looked up avahi on the web, but as far as I could see
>>> it is not doing anything essential;
>>> so I was wondering if stopping avahi-daemon would have any bad effect?
>> Avahi is a mdns daemon. You can safely disable i
create the USB
media:
http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Installation_Guide/Making_USB_Media.html
One would assume that might work if you just needed DVD 1 of CentOS.
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.o
On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote:
>> 1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full duplex.
>> 2. Many times NIC fails to come up properly during PXE boot:
>>
>> Any other ideas?
> udev rules?
> mii-tool?
> ___
> CentOS ma
eems heavy handed)
http://www.gurulabs.com/goodies/guru-guides/YUM-automatic-local-mirror/
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
27;t say
I'm a real expert with it, but if you post your symptoms maybe I can
help you troubleshoot it.
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
stall in
smaller chunks at your leisure.
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Monday, December 12, 2011, Alan McKay wrote:
> Surely there must be a way to have yum on the first box automatically
cache
> everything and then have the other boxes use the cache? Maybe if not
> directly, then with squid or something like that?
You can find the RPMs in /var/cache/yum (from
.repo extension really missing? IIRC that
is required for yum to pick up the file (otherwise yum would be trying
to parse .rpmsave files and the like).
--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 10/30/2011 8:33 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Sunday, October 30, 2011 08:38 PM, William Warren wrote:
>
>> Or move to another distro that has timely security updates and long term
>> support like Centos.
> What...Ubuntu "LTS"?
> __
On 10/21/2011 12:54 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 10/21/2011 10:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
>> wrote:
>>
Johnny, chill. I don't blame him for being confused. Up until right now,
you updated to a point release, then, over the weeks
On 10/21/2011 10:17 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On Fri, October 21, 2011 16:02, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>>
>> Giles Coochey wrote:
>>> So Centos 6.0 is EOL?
>> not familiar with the rhel life cycle are you?
>> Read this:
>> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/
>>
1 - 100 of 1179 matches
Mail list logo
