We use a pair for production and DR.
Email me off list and I would be glad to discuss.
Andrew
--Original Message--
From: Eugene Vilensky
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
To: CentOS mailing list
ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Dell Equallogic
Sent: Oct 12, 2009 8:04 PM
Hi
> -Original Message-
> Subject: [CentOS] OT: Web "Project" type software
>
> Sorry for the OT... I'm looking for some software to fill a
> fairly specific set of requirements. I'm not necessarily
> looking for project software, but it seems like the closest
> to match what I need. I'm a
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Eduardo Grosclaude
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 2:54 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] need trouble ticket system
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Dhaval Thak
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sam
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 8:17 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Suggestion for Server Room monitoring
>
> David Hrbác wrote:
> > Fajar Priyanto napsal(a
> Greetings list-
>
> I'm on the hunt for a cron scheduler that supports definitions to the
> second. Obviously, every cron daemon supports minute/hour/etc but I have a
> special application that requires finer granularity.
>
> I know I know... someone will say "The load will be horrendous on your
>
> Hm. Zimbra does _that_ very well IMO. Supports IE+FF+Safari,
> at least for the webmail-stuff.
>
> I'm not sure if the Open-Source version actually supports the
> Outlook-stuff (we use the commercial version and I don't use
> Outlook anyway...).
>
> I'd give Zimbra a try. It's relativel
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Duffner
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 5:32 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite
>
>
> Am 07.01.2009 um 22:24 schrieb Adam Tauno W
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Bo Lynch
> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 2:56 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Email/GroupWare Suite
>
> Just wanted to get some thoughts from the list.
>
> We a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Rainer Duffner
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 4:34 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] HA Storage Cookbook?
Rudi Ahlers schrieb:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:27 PM, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Agreed.
>
>http://www.equallogic.com/products/view.aspx?id=1791
>
>10.5 TB raw capasity, and can be expanded online by adding new arrays to
the group.
>
>Linear scalability for both capasity and performance.. with automatic load
balancing. just add arrays. really nice.
>
>-- Pasi
>
I believe they
We have been looking at iSCSI SANs lately and with the names you mentioned,
I would recommend also looking at Equallogic. The PS400E I think gets you
to about the right level of storage.
DAS/NAS is a different ballgame. We are looking at SAN for virtualization
purposes.
Andrew
-Original
If you are open to not using CentOS (which is wonderful), I would suggest
something like pfsense. http://www.pfsense.com/
Based on M0n0wall and I think it will do what you are looking for. This
would mean you would need a seperate set of hardware however. As for
hardware, if you have an old m
12 matches
Mail list logo
