Re: [CentOS] looking for cool, post-install things to do on a centos 5.5 system

2010-09-17 Thread andrew . hearn
On 17/09/10 08:39, Robert P. J. Day wrote: (note: i asked this a few days ago but it *appears* that that post was tossed due to getting excessive bounces from my account. so i'm posting it again, apologies if you're seeing it a second time.) over the next several weeks, i'm teaching

Re: [CentOS] Yum Repo that has xcache

2009-06-19 Thread andrew . hearn
James Matthews wrote: Hi, I am wondering where I can get a repo that has xcache. (Or if anyone has any tips on a PHP optimizer) How about http://www.jasonlitka.com/yum-repository/ Looks to have XCache 1.2.2 -- Andrew ___ CentOS mailing list

[CentOS] lmsensors support in net-snmp

2008-08-29 Thread Andrew Hearn
Hello, I'm wanting to use cacti* to graph my motherboard fan/temperature/voltage readings. I have sensors working and it giving me the temperatures ets, but it seems that net-snmp needs to be compiled with sensors/lmsensors support. Is there a centos 5 rpm for net-snmp that support this?

[CentOS] System Rebooted by 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5

2008-03-26 Thread Andrew Hearn
Hello, I have a machine that seemed to reboot by itself yesterday, in /var/log/messages I only see: Mar 25 14:26:45 asterisk shutdown[19256]: shutting down for system reboot When I type: last reboot I see: reboot system boot 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5 Tue Mar 25 14:28 (18:41) So it seems

Re: [CentOS] System Rebooted by 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5

2008-03-26 Thread Andrew Hearn
Mogens Kjaer wrote: Andrew Hearn wrote: Hello, I have a machine that seemed to reboot by itself yesterday, in /var/log/messages I only see: Mar 25 14:26:45 asterisk shutdown[19256]: shutting down for system reboot What do you mean by only see? Are there no lines before this in /var

Re: [CentOS] ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB887

2007-07-09 Thread Andrew Hearn (AAISP)
300) ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB887 scsi3 : sata_nv ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xB487 If it was the ports that you have drives on then I would be more worried ... Ah, I see ;-) thanks for pointing that out Lance! -- Andrew