On Monday 18 May 2009 19:46, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
> Is there a repository that has php version 5.2 or greater available for use
> with the Centos 5.3 distribution?
> This includes the development libraries package. Thanks.
Just finished compiling php 5.2.9 from the sprms I found here:
http://o
On Thursday 16 October 2008 12:08, bruce wrote:
> when you're saying "crashing", what exactly do you mean?.. is it the app
> that crashes.. is it that your mouse/keyboard no longer works?, is your
> system still running (you can ssh into it), but you can't move your
> mouse???
it crashed, it asplo
On Thursday 16 October 2008 07:26, Michael Simpson wrote:
> > Ditto here. Have you run an "rpm --verify" to see if you have corruption
> > problems? Have you mixed installs from (possibly conflicting) repos? I
> > suspect one of those two. Have you checked your hardware (memtest,
> > etc.)? If the
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 13:27, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > ever since the RPM for FF3 came out it has been crashing daily. Usually
> > when I use Save As... or Browse... or anything else that brings up the
> > Gnome file picker. After the crash I re-start then the file picker works
> > for
does anyone else have major probs with Firefox as installed on CentOS5?
ever since the RPM for FF3 came out it has been crashing daily. Usually when I
use Save As... or Browse... or anything else that brings up the Gnome file
picker. After the crash I re-start then the file picker works for a wh
On Thursday 09 October 2008 12:31, nate wrote:
> Now it looks like Red hat has woken up and seen it is
> a dead end too and is moving to KVM as you mentioned.
where did you read this? I have just started with xen too but I don't want to
be left hanging...
I have a client-provided SSL cert that seems to be provided by Verisign but
issued by my good friends at Network Problems. I thought this was part of
default cert.pem, but maybe not.
The docs on Verisign's site are... ahem... unhelpful.
I have what I think is the correct CA chain for this cert,
has anyone had any luck getting nvidia to work with the latest xen kernel
under x86_64? I found an unsupported method involving IGNORE_XEN_PRESENCE
[1], but it doesn't work for me. Everything google turns up seems to be a
year old. prob nothing has changed but I just wonder.
[1] http://www.nvne
On Tuesday 12 August 2008 15:44, Jancio Wodnik wrote:
> Hm. And what about selinux and httpd ? Selinux is securing httpd from
> this attacks, right ? Selinux was disabled ?
good point, SElinux is set to permissive on this system because we had to get
up and running in a hurry and support a lot of
On Tuesday 12 August 2008 13:39, Jeff Kinz wrote:
> If you don't mind I would like to use it as a real world example for a
> class I'm teaching? I will remove all the identifying information
> first of course.
Sure go right ahead.
Unfortunately I have tons of real world examples... :/
cheers
Sa
On Tuesday 12 August 2008 12:18, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> (I think it requires both register_globals and allow_url_fopen to be on,
> but I'm not sure if you can't get it to work with only allow_url_fopen)
as I just found out, it can, as long as the PHP developer was even more naive
than usual.
On Tuesday 12 August 2008 10:16, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Anything in /tmp ?
>
> Disable register_globals and allow_url_fopen.
> Set open_basedir for any virtual hosts to the absolute minimum.
allow_url_fopen was enabled on one of many sites. A developer put in an unsafe
php include(). This allowe
On Tuesday 12 August 2008 09:08, Mr Shunz wrote:
> maybe you should check with "lsof -p 3041" and see which files/pipes it
> uses to have a clue.
of course!
it's a perl w0rm that was uploaded last night, now killed. Now to determine
how it got in.
I found some output in the main apache error l
Ok, dumb question. On a certain LAMP server I am seeing in 'ps auxf' a process
called "unit" with no arguments or other path info. It has a fairly low pid,
3041, indicating it might have been started soon after reboot (last week).
but ps says it was started yesterday,
I don't see it on any of 3
Thanks guys for the info. I understand that the secondary machine needs a /var
too while in standby, and since it can't also mount it as part of the DRBD
array, then it has to be a vanilla partition on both machines. Thanks for
clearing that up.
On Saturday 31 May 2008 09:28, Filipe Brandenburg
I have an existing in-production LAMP server running Centos 5.1. It uses
physical partitions on top of hardware RAID1, having / /home /var and /boot
on separate partitions.
We have a near-identical system I am thinking of bringing in as a
DRBD/Heartbeat companion. One solution may be to use csy
Interested in this discussion too, for reasons recently discussed...
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 09:07, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> For a starter, there is a very simple tool for this.
> It's http://www.inlab.de/balance.html
> 2. RedHat Cluster Suite dan Piranha (http://www.redhat.com)
> 3. Linux Virtual
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 13:16, Miguel Medalha wrote:
> Some Tyan boards are known as being very picky with RAM. If you want to
> avoid problems, you should really stick to the types listed in Tyan's
> memory compatibility list.
hmm. well the spec sheet just says "unbuffered DDR 266/200" and that is
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 11:39, Scott Silva wrote:
> Running memtest for 24 hours should be enough to test the ram.
> A 3ware 7006 is a fairly old card. Does it have the latest bios available
> from 3ware?
> You could always eliminate the 3ware controller by installing a drive on
> whatever built in
19 matches
Mail list logo
