Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and systemd: SysV initscript: how detect boot vs. interactive use?

2016-12-28 Thread whitivery
whitivery wrote: >Jonathan Billings >wrote: > >>On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 08:50:54PM -0800, whitivery wrote: >>> It is a system with several servers (various platforms/distros). >>> >>> One piece of software runs on all of the servers. For it to operate

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and systemd: SysV initscript: how detect boot vs. interactive use?

2016-12-20 Thread whitivery
Jonathan Billings wrote: >On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 08:50:54PM -0800, whitivery wrote: >> It is a system with several servers (various platforms/distros). >> >> One piece of software runs on all of the servers. For it to operate >> correctly, the instance on one serve

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 and systemd: SysV initscript: how detect boot vs. interactive use?

2016-12-18 Thread whitivery
James Hogarth wrote: >On 18 Dec 2016 10:59, "whitivery" wrote: > >Moving from CentOS 5 to CentOS 7, discovered that a test in a SysV >initscript for whether it is running interactively, instead of at boot >time, no longer works. > >Under CentOS 7 / systemd, is th

[CentOS] CentOS 7 and systemd: SysV initscript: how detect boot vs. interactive use?

2016-12-18 Thread whitivery
Moving from CentOS 5 to CentOS 7, discovered that a test in a SysV initscript for whether it is running interactively, instead of at boot time, no longer works. Under CentOS 7 / systemd, is there some way for the initscript to know this? ___ CentOS mai

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.7 - occasional lockup

2013-11-18 Thread whitivery
John R Pierce wrote: >On 11/16/2013 9:50 PM, whitivery wrote: >> What else might I try? > >centos 6.latest ?or at least 5.latest5.7 is circa 2011, >there's dozens of kernel patches since then, its up to 5.10 now. Thank you John and John for the replies. I wa

[CentOS] CentOS 5.7 - occasional lockup

2013-11-16 Thread whitivery
Using Core i7 boxes with CentOS 5.7, have experienced lockups on half of a handful of units over a couple months. They are Logic Supply Mini-ITX model KR960 with Core i7-3610QE. A couple weeks ago I enabled self-reboot on kernel panic (echo 10 > /proc/sys/kernel/panic) on all units, and had anoth

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.7 Ethernet bonding - order of enslavement matters?

2011-10-19 Thread whitivery
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: >On 10/13/11, whitivery wrote: >>>Eth0 is the onboard device, using an updated VIA Velocity driver >>>(velocityget 1.42 instead of default via-velocity): >>> >>>05:00.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6120/VT6121/VT6

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.7 Ethernet bonding - order of enslavement matters?

2011-10-13 Thread whitivery
whitivery wrote: >Setting up bonding in active-backup mode 1 (using ARP monitoring) >on a server, it looked OK, but pulling the active link cable >didn't actually work, it didn't fail over. > >Eventually with manual playing around with modprobe, ifconfig, >ife

[CentOS] CentOS 5.7 Ethernet bonding - order of enslavement matters?

2011-10-08 Thread whitivery
Setting up bonding in active-backup mode 1 (using ARP monitoring) on a server, it looked OK, but pulling the active link cable didn't actually work, it didn't fail over. Eventually with manual playing around with modprobe, ifconfig, ifenslave, etc., a solution was stumbled upon: enslave the eth1 d

Re: [CentOS] Cannot %include in CentOS 5.5 kickstart

2011-03-18 Thread whitivery
whitivery wrote: >whitivery wrote: > >>whitivery wrote: >> >>>Patrick Lists >>> wrote: >>> >>>>On 03/10/2011 08:14 AM, whitivery wrote: >>>>> # This does not work >>>>> %include /tmp/drvdis

Re: [CentOS] Cannot %include in CentOS 5.5 kickstart

2011-03-17 Thread whitivery
whitivery wrote: >whitivery wrote: > >>Patrick Lists >> wrote: >> >>>On 03/10/2011 08:14 AM, whitivery wrote: >>>> # This does not work >>>> %include /tmp/drvdisk >>>> >>>> # This works >>

Re: [CentOS] Cannot %include in CentOS 5.5 kickstart

2011-03-16 Thread whitivery
whitivery wrote: >Patrick Lists > wrote: > >>On 03/10/2011 08:14 AM, whitivery wrote: >>> # This does not work >>> %include /tmp/drvdisk >>> >>> # This works >>> #driverdisk >>> --source=nfs:10.0.4.157:/srv/cobbler/RHE

Re: [CentOS] Cannot %include in CentOS 5.5 kickstart

2011-03-15 Thread whitivery
Patrick Lists wrote: >On 03/10/2011 08:14 AM, whitivery wrote: >> # This does not work >> %include /tmp/drvdisk >> >> # This works >> #driverdisk >> --source=nfs:10.0.4.157:/srv/cobbler/RHEL5.5_x86_402_409_410_DD.img >> >> >> %packa

[CentOS] Cannot %include in CentOS 5.5 kickstart

2011-03-10 Thread whitivery
I've previously used includes in CentOS 4.4 and they worked fine. But in CentOS 5.5, trying to specify a driver disk via an include does not work. If I instead specify it directly, it loads fine. When it fails (because it can't see the disk drive - needs the driver disk to see the hard disk), in