Re: [CentOS] (Al)pine on CentOS 6

2013-03-28 Thread Rex Dieter
Max Pyziur wrote: > The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration > files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible? It's a packaging trick, those files are marked %ghost %config -- rex ___ CentOS mailing lis

Re: [CentOS] (Al)pine on CentOS 6

2013-03-28 Thread Max Pyziur
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Louis Lagendijk wrote: > On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 06:14 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration >> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible? > > yes, they are ghost files, not reall

Re: [CentOS] (Al)pine on CentOS 6

2013-03-27 Thread Louis Lagendijk
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 06:14 -0400, Max Pyziur wrote: > Greetings, > > The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration > files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible? yes, they are ghost files, not really included in the package Louis __

Re: [CentOS] (Al)pine on CentOS 6

2013-03-26 Thread m . roth
Max Pyziur wrote: > On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> Max Pyziur wrote: >>> >>> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration >>> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible? >>> >>> Also, how did you get rid of the annoying alpine bug: a

Re: [CentOS] (Al)pine on CentOS 6

2013-03-26 Thread Max Pyziur
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Max Pyziur wrote: >> >> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration >> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible? >> >> Also, how did you get rid of the annoying alpine bug: a message that keeps >> flas

Re: [CentOS] (Al)pine on CentOS 6

2013-03-26 Thread m . roth
Max Pyziur wrote: > > The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration > files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible? > > Also, how did you get rid of the annoying alpine bug: a message that keeps > flashing - [Folder vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail

Re: [CentOS] (Al)pine on CentOS 6

2013-03-26 Thread SilverTip257
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Max Pyziur wrote: > On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, m...@tdiehl.org wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Max Pyziur wrote: > > > >> > >> Greetings, > >> > >> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration > >> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren

Re: [CentOS] (Al)pine on CentOS 6

2013-03-26 Thread Max Pyziur
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, m...@tdiehl.org wrote: > On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Max Pyziur wrote: > >> >> Greetings, >> >> The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration >> files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible? >> >> Also, how did you get rid of the annoying a

Re: [CentOS] (Al)pine on CentOS 6

2013-03-26 Thread SilverTip257
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:56 AM, wrote: > On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Max Pyziur wrote: > > > > > Greetings, > > > > The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration > > files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible? > > > > Also, how did you get rid of the annoyi

Re: [CentOS] (Al)pine on CentOS 6

2013-03-26 Thread me
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Max Pyziur wrote: > > Greetings, > > The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration > files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible? > > Also, how did you get rid of the annoying alpine bug: a message that keeps > flashing - [Folder vu

[CentOS] (Al)pine on CentOS 6

2013-03-26 Thread Max Pyziur
Greetings, The alpine mail rpm indicates that it comes packaged with configuration files (/etc/pine*conf*). However, they aren't there. Possible? Also, how did you get rid of the annoying alpine bug: a message that keeps flashing - [Folder vulnerable - directory /var/spool/mail must have 1777