Re: [CentOS] /boot partition or not on C5

2007-09-25 Thread Alain Spineux
Do you have multiple disk ? Can you search on all your disk for grub's files ? On 9/25/07, mark pryor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, the last 3 times I installed C5, the MBR was unchanged and nothing was written into /boot/grub except splash.xbm.gz there were no stage* files, nor a

Re: [CentOS] /boot partition or not on C5

2007-09-25 Thread Phil Schaffner
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:13 +0200, Alain Spineux wrote: Do you have multiple disk ? Can you search on all your disk for grub's files ? On 9/25/07, mark pryor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, the last 3 times I installed C5, the MBR was unchanged and nothing was written into /boot/grub

Re: [CentOS] /boot partition or not on C5

2007-09-25 Thread James A. Peltier
mark pryor wrote: hello, the last 3 times I installed C5, the MBR was unchanged and nothing was written into /boot/grub except splash.xbm.gz there were no stage* files, nor a menu.lst I know how to fix that. Would I have better luck using a partition mounted as /boot? Anyone succeded with

Re: [CentOS] /boot partition or not on C5

2007-09-25 Thread Bart Schaefer
On 9/25/07, Phil Schaffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have installed C5 with/without a /boot partition, but having a /boot seems to be the safer bet. If / is LVM a /boot is required as GRUB doesn't seem to be able to deal with LVM My one experience with installing CentOS 5 with / on a USB drive

[CentOS] /boot partition or not on C5

2007-09-24 Thread mark pryor
hello, the last 3 times I installed C5, the MBR was unchanged and nothing was written into /boot/grub except splash.xbm.gz there were no stage* files, nor a menu.lst I know how to fix that. Would I have better luck using a partition mounted as /boot? Anyone succeded with Grub that way? I