On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> There should be a way to specify arrays to be skipped during the check
> until the real problem of quiescing the arrays is fixed. Or make the
> RAID1/10 write transactions atomic like the RAID5/6 (which they should
> be in my opinion, but lowers
On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 12/01/2009 02:36 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
>> So my take on all of that is, if you see it on RAID-5 or RAID-6, you
>> should worry. But if it's on an array with memory mapped files or
>> swap
>> files/partitions that is RAID-1 or RAID-10, i
On 12/01/2009 02:36 PM, Thomas Harold wrote:
> So my take on all of that is, if you see it on RAID-5 or RAID-6, you
> should worry. But if it's on an array with memory mapped files or swap
> files/partitions that is RAID-1 or RAID-10, it's less of a worry.
but then do we (the /etc/cron.weekly/9
W dniu 2009-12-01 11:06, RedShift pisze:
> Jancio Wodnik wrote:
>
>> W dniu 30.11.2009 14:08, Farkas Levente pisze:
>>
>>> hi,
>>> it's been a few weeks since rhel/centos 5.4 released and there were many
>>> discussion about this new "feature" the weekly raid partition check.
>>> we've go
On 12/1/2009 8:05 AM, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> I have the problem on 2 servers, and both of those servers are also running
> a VMware image (very small, but constantly used) under VMware Server 2.
> Could it be that the .vmem file, or even the virtual disk is constantly
> written to, and the raid is c
On 2009-12-01 13:51, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:06, RedShift wrote:
>> Jancio Wodnik wrote:
>>> W dniu 30.11.2009 14:08, Farkas Levente pisze:
hi,
it's been a few weeks since rhel/centos 5.4 released and there were many
discussion about this new "feature" the
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:06, RedShift wrote:
> Jancio Wodnik wrote:
>> W dniu 30.11.2009 14:08, Farkas Levente pisze:
>>> hi,
>>> it's been a few weeks since rhel/centos 5.4 released and there were many
>>> discussion about this new "feature" the weekly raid partition check.
>>> we've got a lot's
Jancio Wodnik wrote:
> W dniu 30.11.2009 14:08, Farkas Levente pisze:
>> hi,
>> it's been a few weeks since rhel/centos 5.4 released and there were many
>> discussion about this new "feature" the weekly raid partition check.
>> we've got a lot's of server with raid1 system and i already try to
>> c
W dniu 30.11.2009 14:08, Farkas Levente pisze:
> hi,
> it's been a few weeks since rhel/centos 5.4 released and there were many
> discussion about this new "feature" the weekly raid partition check.
> we've got a lot's of server with raid1 system and i already try to
> configure them not to send th
Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
it's been a few weeks since rhel/centos 5.4 released and there were many
discussion about this new "feature" the weekly raid partition check.
we've got a lot's of server with raid1 system and i already try to
configure them not to send these messages, but i'm not able ie
hi,
it's been a few weeks since rhel/centos 5.4 released and there were many
discussion about this new "feature" the weekly raid partition check.
we've got a lot's of server with raid1 system and i already try to
configure them not to send these messages, but i'm not able ie. i
already add to the S
11 matches
Mail list logo
