On 03/10/2018 14:31, Larry Martell wrote:
>
> It only went smoothly because there were people like me fixing the issues ;-)
In that case perhaps I should take some of the credit for writing code
that never had a Y2K problem in the first place. ;-)
> I worked on Wall St at the time, and I got a
On 10/02/18 13:41, Johann Fock wrote:
Hallo
Im using CentOS 7
Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version
Thanks
Johann Fock
Hey Johann,
You should submit this question to the Fedora mailing list. CentOS is
downstream from Fedora. If the problem is not fixed there it
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 09:50, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> On 10/02/2018 12:41 PM, Johann Fock wrote:
> > Hallo
> > Im using CentOS 7
> > Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version
> >
>
> Well, CentOS-7 will be EOL'ed on 30 June 2024 so does it matter?
If you have code which is
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 10:04:57AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:49:56 -0500 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > From: Johnny Hughes
> > To: centos@centos.org
> > Message-ID:
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Pro
At Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:49:56 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote:
>
>
> From: Johnny Hughes
> To: centos@centos.org
> Message-ID:
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem
> References: <8831b7ae-76c1-4cf1-815c-ef52d4c5d...@abas.de>
> In-Reply-To: <8831b7ae-76
On 10/03/2018 08:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 10/02/2018 12:41 PM, Johann Fock wrote:
>> Hallo
>> Im using CentOS 7
>> Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version
>>
>
> Well, CentOS-7 will be EOL'ed on 30 June 2024 so does it matter?
>
Putting it another way .. the first
On 10/02/2018 12:41 PM, Johann Fock wrote:
> Hallo
> Im using CentOS 7
> Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version
>
Well, CentOS-7 will be EOL'ed on 30 June 2024 so does it matter?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:46 PM Mark Rousell wrote:
>
> On 02/10/2018 18:46, Larry Martell wrote:
> > I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue.
>
> I don't think I've ever said this but I am very envious of all these
> people who had loads of work due to Y2K or were paid obscene amounts
On 03/10/2018 02:46, Mark Rousell wrote:
> I don't think I've ever said this but [...]
Oops, sorry. This was off-topic here. I actually thought this was a
different mail list where it would have been on-topic.
--
Mark Rousell
___
CentOS mailing
On 02/10/2018 18:46, Larry Martell wrote:
> I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue.
I don't think I've ever said this but I am very envious of all these
people who had loads of work due to Y2K or were paid obscene amounts of
money to tend systems over new year's eve/day.
I was working
If you do that make sure it's a system you're happy to junk and
reinstall. I have painful memories of trying to sort out systems we
rolled forward over Y2K. Amongst other things the license manager
became convinced we were trying to fiddle things. :-(
On 02/10/18 20:07, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
On 10/2/18 10:41 AM, Johann Fock wrote:
Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version
If you define the problem as the limitations of system clock based on a
32-bit representation of seconds relative to the epoch, then the answer
is "yes." The Linux kernel uses a 64-bit
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 1:42 PM Johann Fock wrote:
>>
>> Hallo
>> Im using CentOS 7
>> Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version
>
> I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue. In 2038 I will be
> 79 - maybe I will have to come out of retirement to work on that.
>
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 13:42, Johann Fock wrote:
>
> Hallo
> Im using CentOS 7
> Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version
>
I doubt there is any one answer without a deep audit of all the
binaries involved. Most date/clock code in 64 bit should be too big to
care, but if you
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 1:42 PM Johann Fock wrote:
>
> Hallo
> Im using CentOS 7
> Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version
I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue. In 2038 I will be
79 - maybe I will have to come out of retirement to work on that.
Hallo
Im using CentOS 7
Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version
Thanks
Johann Fock
Von meinem iPad gesendet
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
16 matches
Mail list logo