Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-04 Thread Mark Rousell
On 03/10/2018 14:31, Larry Martell wrote: > > It only went smoothly because there were people like me fixing the issues ;-) In that case perhaps I should take some of the credit for writing code that never had a Y2K problem in the first place. ;-) > I worked on Wall St at the time, and I got a

Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-03 Thread Mark LaPierre
On 10/02/18 13:41, Johann Fock wrote: Hallo Im using CentOS 7 Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version Thanks Johann Fock Hey Johann, You should submit this question to the Fedora mailing list. CentOS is downstream from Fedora. If the problem is not fixed there it

Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-03 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 09:50, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 10/02/2018 12:41 PM, Johann Fock wrote: > > Hallo > > Im using CentOS 7 > > Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version > > > > Well, CentOS-7 will be EOL'ed on 30 June 2024 so does it matter? If you have code which is

Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-03 Thread Fred Smith
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 10:04:57AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > At Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:49:56 -0500 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > > > > > > > From: Johnny Hughes > > To: centos@centos.org > > Message-ID: > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Pro

Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-03 Thread Robert Heller
At Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:49:56 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > From: Johnny Hughes > To: centos@centos.org > Message-ID: > Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem > References: <8831b7ae-76c1-4cf1-815c-ef52d4c5d...@abas.de> > In-Reply-To: <8831b7ae-76

Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-03 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/03/2018 08:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/02/2018 12:41 PM, Johann Fock wrote: >> Hallo >> Im using CentOS 7 >> Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version >> > > Well, CentOS-7 will be EOL'ed on 30 June 2024 so does it matter? > Putting it another way .. the first

Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-03 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 10/02/2018 12:41 PM, Johann Fock wrote: > Hallo > Im using CentOS 7 > Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version > Well, CentOS-7 will be EOL'ed on 30 June 2024 so does it matter? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-03 Thread Larry Martell
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:46 PM Mark Rousell wrote: > > On 02/10/2018 18:46, Larry Martell wrote: > > I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue. > > I don't think I've ever said this but I am very envious of all these > people who had loads of work due to Y2K or were paid obscene amounts

Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-03 Thread Mark Rousell
On 03/10/2018 02:46, Mark Rousell wrote: > I don't think I've ever said this but [...] Oops, sorry. This was off-topic here. I actually thought this was a different mail list where it would have been on-topic. -- Mark Rousell ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-02 Thread Mark Rousell
On 02/10/2018 18:46, Larry Martell wrote: > I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue. I don't think I've ever said this but I am very envious of all these people who had loads of work due to Y2K or were paid obscene amounts of money to tend systems over new year's eve/day. I was working

Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-02 Thread J Martin Rushton via CentOS
If you do that make sure it's a system you're happy to junk and reinstall. I have painful memories of trying to sort out systems we rolled forward over Y2K. Amongst other things the license manager became convinced we were trying to fiddle things. :-( On 02/10/18 20:07, Gordon Messmer wrote: >

Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-02 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 10/2/18 10:41 AM, Johann Fock wrote: Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version If you define the problem as the limitations of system clock based on a 32-bit representation of seconds relative to the epoch, then the answer is "yes."  The Linux kernel uses a 64-bit

Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-02 Thread Jay Hart
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 1:42 PM Johann Fock wrote: >> >> Hallo >> Im using CentOS 7 >> Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version > > I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue. In 2038 I will be > 79 - maybe I will have to come out of retirement to work on that. >

Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-02 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 13:42, Johann Fock wrote: > > Hallo > Im using CentOS 7 > Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version > I doubt there is any one answer without a deep audit of all the binaries involved. Most date/clock code in 64 bit should be too big to care, but if you

Re: [CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-02 Thread Larry Martell
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 1:42 PM Johann Fock wrote: > > Hallo > Im using CentOS 7 > Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version I got 2 years of work solving the year 2000 issue. In 2038 I will be 79 - maybe I will have to come out of retirement to work on that.

[CentOS] 2038 year Problem

2018-10-02 Thread Johann Fock
Hallo Im using CentOS 7 Ist the 2038 year Problem solved in CentOS 7.5 64 bit Version Thanks Johann Fock Von meinem iPad gesendet ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos