Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-04 Thread Kai Schaetzl
I updated two machines yesterday. No problems after reboot so far. Very smooth. Before I was able to update I hit minor annoyances with getting rid of packages I didn't want installed (like linuxwacom) and a perl dependency of a third-party perl package. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-04 Thread Timothy Murphy
Kai Schaetzl wrote: I updated two machines yesterday. No problems after reboot so far. Very smooth. I also updated two servers in the last few days without any problems. I don't think I have ever had such a simple upgrade of any system. I'd like to add my thanks to the Centos team.

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-04 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Timothy Murphy wrote on Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:26:24 +0100: I yum-updated glibc, glibc-devel, yum and rpm before upgrading. I forgot to mention that I did not do this. No problems. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-04 Thread Michael A. Peters
Timothy Murphy wrote: Kai Schaetzl wrote: I updated two machines yesterday. No problems after reboot so far. Very smooth. I also updated two servers in the last few days without any problems. I don't think I have ever had such a simple upgrade of any system. I have - twice before. Once

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-04 Thread Kevin Krieser
On Apr 4, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote: Timothy Murphy wrote: Kai Schaetzl wrote: I updated two machines yesterday. No problems after reboot so far. Very smooth. I also updated two servers in the last few days without any problems. I don't think I have ever had such a

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-04 Thread Michael A. Peters
Kevin Krieser wrote: On Apr 4, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Michael A. Peters wrote: Kernel problems happen. Yes - I've had mixed results with power management with and audio on laptops before in Fedora with kernel updates, but none recently. Going from Fedora 8 to CentOS 5 broke my thinkpad sleep

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-04 Thread Frank Cox
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:31:19 +0200 Kai Schaetzl wrote: Timothy Murphy wrote on Sat, 04 Apr 2009 13:26:24 +0100: I yum-updated glibc, glibc-devel, yum and rpm before upgrading. I forgot to mention that I did not do this. No problems. I've upgrade 3 machines so far and had no issues on any

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-03 Thread luc...@lastdot.org
On 04/02/2009 06:05 PM, Tim Nelson wrote: Greetings CentOS Team- Since the list tends to be filled with things don't work and why did you do it this way and complaint X, I thought I'd make a small deviation... I have a production system running on a Dell Poweredge 2650 server. I simply

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-03 Thread Andrew Hull
Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote: So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund. :-) I agree. I've only updated

[CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-02 Thread Tim Nelson
Greetings CentOS Team- Since the list tends to be filled with things don't work and why did you do it this way and complaint X, I thought I'd make a small deviation... I have a production system running on a Dell Poweredge 2650 server. I simply ran 'yum update' and rebooted with no problems.

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-02 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote: So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund. :-) I agree. I've only updated one server so far (the

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-02 Thread Laurent Wandrebeck
2009/4/2 Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com: On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote: So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund. :-) I agree.

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-02 Thread Anne Wilson
On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:50:30 Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote: So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund.

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-02 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday 02 April 2009 19:50, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Tim Nelson wrote: So, I just wanted to say 'Thank You' to all those who put in such hard work into the CentOS project. The time between releases was not a problem here. If it was, I guess I'd just ask for a refund.

Re: [CentOS] 5.3 Update Success

2009-04-02 Thread Ron Blizzard
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote: Greetings CentOS Team- Since the list tends to be filled with things don't work and why did you do it this way and complaint X, I thought I'd make a small deviation... I have a production system running on a Dell