>> To follow-up on my own storry, I got there this morning, expecting to
>> find the server stuck at fsck or somthing similar, only to find it with
>> only the sord "GRUB" on the screen, and beeping like crazy. I didn't
>> have any iso nor centos cd with me, so I'll get back there this
>> after-no
On 04/11/2011 10:17 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:26:55PM -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
> Remember, you could have been at the limit of reboots before it does a
> automatic fsck. Been there, done that.
...or time, if the filesystem has a force-fsck-after-N-da
>>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:26:55PM -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Remember, you could have been at the limit of reboots before it does a
automatic fsck. Been there, done that.
>>> ...or time, if the filesystem has a force-fsck-after-N-days feature.
>> Yes, it could have, but it's been
(...)
>> Please post a follow-up, I'm curious what went wrong. :)
>>
> Maybe your server is hanging at fsck recovery shell waiting for root
> password (or user interaction).
Probably that.
> Do you have a option to reboot you system into rescue mode or better a
> KVM over IP ?
Sorry, no, that serv
- "Nicolas Ross" escreveu:
>
> 5.6 is out. That is good news.
>
Well, I did it on a bunch of servers, and until now always ok.
Nice work :)
Antonio
--
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Antonio S. Martins Jr. - Support Analyst | "Only The
Le 09/04/2011 08:23, Paul Daggett a écrit :
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Nicolas Ross
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: Fri, April 8, 2011 8:24:39 PM
> Subject: [CentOS] 5.6 is out, great my first upgrade didn't work...
>
> 5.6 is out. That is good news.
- Original Message
From: Nicolas Ross
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Fri, April 8, 2011 8:24:39 PM
Subject: [CentOS] 5.6 is out, great my first upgrade didn't work...
5.6 is out. That is good news.
I did a yum update on one of my non-critical server, and the server
stoped respo
On 04/09/2011 03:03 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 04/08/2011 10:00 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:26:55PM -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Remember, you could have been at the limit of reboots before it does a
automatic fsck. Been there, done that.
>>> ...or time, if th
On 04/08/2011 10:00 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:26:55PM -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
>>> Remember, you could have been at the limit of reboots before it does a
>>> automatic fsck. Been there, done that.
>> ...or time, if the filesystem has a force-fsck-after-N-days fe
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:26:55PM -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
>> Remember, you could have been at the limit of reboots before it does a
>> automatic fsck. Been there, done that.
> ...or time, if the filesystem has a force-fsck-after-N-days feature.
Yes, it could have, but it's been 2 hours n
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 07:26:55PM -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
>
> Remember, you could have been at the limit of reboots before it does a
> automatic fsck. Been there, done that.
...or time, if the filesystem has a force-fsck-after-N-days feature.
--keith
--
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Nicolas Ross wrote:
> 5.6 is out. That is good news.
>
> I did a yum update on one of my non-critical server, and the server
> stoped responding to ping after the reboot, and never answered back.
> It's now been 10 minutes, so I'll have to take a ride to the colo...
>
> Nice wo
5.6 is out. That is good news.
I did a yum update on one of my non-critical server, and the server
stoped responding to ping after the reboot, and never answered back.
It's now been 10 minutes, so I'll have to take a ride to the colo...
Nice work dev team, keep up the good work. Let's hope that
13 matches
Mail list logo
