On 12/07/2015 02:35 PM, Warren Young wrote:
The new version numbering scheme was created to solve a real problem, which
CentOS has been fighting for years.
I don't know how to be any more clear than I was. Neither Greg nor I
(as far as I can tell) were suggesting that the version numbering b
On Dec 7, 2015, at 12:54 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> It has been my impression for a long time that the CentOS developers are
> reluctant to engage the community in contributing to the project
Who is “contributing” here? Where’s the patch? All I see is a bunch of
bikeshedding.
The new ver
On 12/07/2015 06:31 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 07/12/15 04:11, Greg Lindahl wrote:
Oh, wait: CentOS, love it or leave it.
I hope its not that drastic!
As a member of the user community, it's hard to see it any other way.
I want to be fair to everyone, so I'll acknowledge that Greg was maki
On 07/12/2015 18:35, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
On 07/12/2015 14:40, Akemi Yagi wrote:
This bug report:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9860
and its upstream (RH) reference:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285235
might possibly b
Em 07-12-2015 16:35, Akemi Yagi escreveu:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
On 07/12/2015 14:40, Akemi Yagi wrote:
This bug report:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9860
and its upstream (RH) reference:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285235
might poss
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
> On 07/12/2015 14:40, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>> This bug report:
>>
>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9860
>>
>> and its upstream (RH) reference:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285235
>>
>> might possibly be related to t
On 07/12/2015 14:40, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/06/2015 10:11 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
(bit snip)
Oh, wait: CentOS, love it or leave it.
Correct.
In fact, I would prefer you leave.
No, I would prefer ALL of you leave. All of you who are not
Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>> > Oh, wait: CentOS, love it or leave it.
>>
>> Correct.
>>
>> In fact, I would prefer you leave.
>
> Really?
>
> This is what we're dealing with now?
>
> OK. I will recommend we move away from CentOS.
This seems to be raising what to me is a trivial issue
to an absurd
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/06/2015 10:11 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
(bit snip)
>> Oh, wait: CentOS, love it or leave it.
>
> Correct.
>
> In fact, I would prefer you leave.
No, I would prefer ALL of you leave. All of you who are not addressing
the OP's issue should
On 07/12/15 13:03, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> 2. The Alternative Arches (i686, armhpc, aarch64) are not necessarily
> updated as quickly as the main arches. That is one of the reasons they
> are AltArch and not a main arch. However, we are working hard on all of
> those as well.
power7 and 8 ( bot
On 07/12/15 04:11, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 09:22:15PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 06:35:58PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>> Always Learning wrote:
>>>
I always admire Johnny's prose, passion for Centos and his calm approach
to everyth
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 07:03:53AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> 1. The CentOS Release package does not get updated until the full
> release. It will not be updated in CR repo, but will be part of the
> final rollout which includes installable ISOs, etc. Neither will
> Anaconda, which will also
On 12/06/2015 08:22 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 06:35:58PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Always Learning wrote:
>>
>>> I always admire Johnny's prose, passion for Centos and his calm approach
>>> to everything.
>>
>> Agreed.
>> But two possibly OT and probably ignorant
On Dec 7, 2015 07:45, "Johnny Hughes" wrote:
>
> On 12/06/2015 10:11 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 09:22:15PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> >> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 06:35:58PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >>> Always Learning wrote:
> >>>
> I always admire Johnny'
On 12/06/2015 10:11 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 09:22:15PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 06:35:58PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>> Always Learning wrote:
>>>
I always admire Johnny's prose, passion for Centos and his calm approach
to ev
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 09:22:15PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 06:35:58PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> > Always Learning wrote:
> >
> > > I always admire Johnny's prose, passion for Centos and his calm approach
> > > to everything.
> >
> > Agreed.
> > But two possi
On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 06:35:58PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Always Learning wrote:
>
> > I always admire Johnny's prose, passion for Centos and his calm approach
> > to everything.
>
> Agreed.
> But two possibly OT and probably ignorant queries:
>
> 1. I am running a standard Centos 32-bit
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 11:12:32PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> Damn :-(
> Serial cable then? heh
If you don't have IPMI serial console, yes.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Always Learning wrote:
> I always admire Johnny's prose, passion for Centos and his calm approach
> to everything.
Agreed.
But two possibly OT and probably ignorant queries:
1. I am running a standard Centos 32-bit system on my home servers.
I keep them up-to-date, but have not re-booted for sev
On 06/12/2015 01:12, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
Em 05-12-2015 05:35, Duncan Brown escreveu:
On 04/12/2015 19:17, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
Em 03-12-2015 14:46, Duncan Brown escreveu:
Here is a couple of pictures,
http://i.imgur.com/Vqvqn1H.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/WQaz1j9.png
Any use?
Em 05-12-2015 05:35, Duncan Brown escreveu:
On 04/12/2015 19:17, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
Em 03-12-2015 14:46, Duncan Brown escreveu:
Here is a couple of pictures,
http://i.imgur.com/Vqvqn1H.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/WQaz1j9.png
Any use?
Of some. It's failing on ftrace initialization whi
> > The first is "7.1.1503" and has 895 results, and they aren't html
> > pages, they're things like directories containing that string.
> >
> > The second is strings like "7 (1503)", and has 1,700+ results, and
> > they are the html pages.
> >
>
> Puppet, Chef, Ansible and the other CFG Managem
I always admire Johnny's prose, passion for Centos and his calm approach
to everything.
He is right. We are stuck with the numbering system.
On Sat, 2015-12-05 at 12:46 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> The bottom line is, our numbering system works for us to be able to do
> all those things.
>
>
On 12/04/2015 12:46 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 12:06:14PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> i dont see it being dropped, on my completely updated machine i still
>> see the fully qualified numbering in /etc/centos-release ( as an example ) ?
>
> I know this is a big, confus
On 04/12/2015 12:03, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 03/12/15 16:47, Duncan Brown wrote:
Did you rebuild initrd after removing the kmod packages?
Yes, and no change
is it possible to get a bug report at bugs.centos.org with as much
detail as possible, so we can try to reproduce ( and atleast docume
On 04/12/2015 19:17, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
Em 03-12-2015 14:46, Duncan Brown escreveu:
Here is a couple of pictures,
http://i.imgur.com/Vqvqn1H.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/WQaz1j9.png
Any use?
Of some. It's failing on ftrace initialization while allocating
memory, but can't know the rea
Em 03-12-2015 14:46, Duncan Brown escreveu:
Here is a couple of pictures,
http://i.imgur.com/Vqvqn1H.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/WQaz1j9.png
Any use?
Of some. It's failing on ftrace initialization while allocating memory,
but can't know the real reason. It can be just lack of memory or any
other
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 12:06:14PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> i dont see it being dropped, on my completely updated machine i still
> see the fully qualified numbering in /etc/centos-release ( as an example ) ?
I know this is a big, confused thread, but the main complaint is that
the website
On 12/04/2015 08:02 AM, mark wrote:
No, *you* don't understand what we're saying: pre-systemd, if the o/p
saw that one stmt before the panic, they could look at what the system
was doing *sequentially*, and so have an idea what it was failing on.
With systemd's parallelism, we have no clue, oth
On Thu, December 3, 2015 14:50, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
. . .
>> That is my main complaint about parallelized boot. My brain is
>> only capable to deal with serial sequence of events, and which
>> next event is deterministically predictable from previous. As
>> with fatal t
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 08:02:28AM -0500, mark wrote:
> No, *you* don't understand what we're saying: pre-systemd, if the o/p saw
> that one stmt before the panic, they could look at what the system was doing
> *sequentially*, and so have an idea what it was failing on. With systemd's
> parallelism
On 12/03/15 20:54, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Dec 3, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
That is my main complaint about parallelized boot. My brain is only
capable to deal with serial sequence of events, and which next event is
deterministically predictable from previous. As with fatal th
On 03/12/15 13:58, Greg Bailey wrote:
> Those who care about the upstream version knew that this was derived
> from RHEL 7.0. Those who don't care about upstream versions but want to
> track monthly rebuilds of cloud images, etc., could distinguish between
> "1406" and (for example) "1407". But s
On 03/12/15 16:47, Duncan Brown wrote:
>> Did you rebuild initrd after removing the kmod packages?
>>
> Yes, and no change
is it possible to get a bug report at bugs.centos.org with as much
detail as possible, so we can try to reproduce ( and atleast document
and manage it that way ).
thanks
-
On Thu, December 3, 2015 7:54 pm, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Valeri Galtsev
> wrote:
>> That is my main complaint about parallelized boot. My brain is only
>> capable to deal with serial sequence of events, and which next event is
>> deterministically predictable from
On Dec 3, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> That is my main complaint about parallelized boot. My brain is only
> capable to deal with serial sequence of events, and which next event is
> deterministically predictable from previous. As with fatal things like
> kernel panic, it is the previ
On Thu, December 3, 2015 4:05 pm, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 11:01 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Sorry, you seem to not have dealt with enough managers who only really
>> know Windows, or other divisions (esp. ones that are 95% Windows) who
>> require documentation, etc I can live with
On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 11:20 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> If you look down the same wiki Download page, in the 'Base
> Distribution
> section' there is a CentOS release ver to RHEL release ver mapping, to
> indicate which version of the RHEL sources a specific CentOS build is
> derived from.
>
On 12/3/2015 2:05 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Heh, the latest Windows 10 build is actually referred to as the '1511'
version.
yet it returns...
C:\> ver
Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.10586]
go figger.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 11:01 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Sorry, you seem to not have dealt with enough managers who only really
>> know Windows, or other divisions (esp. ones that are 95% Windows) who
>> require documentation, etc I can live wit
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 12:24:23AM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 03.12.2015 um 22:24 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" :
> > Why the change now? It really does matter, a lot, to those of us who need
> > to do compliance testing/security checks, etc. all based on "version"
> > number. I know there is no
On Thu, December 3, 2015 5:24 pm, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 03.12.2015 um 22:24 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew"
> :
>> CentOS should do whatever RHEL/Upstream does.
>>
>> Period.
>
>
> I sometimes misguide myself in doing; CentOS = RHEL, but
> the truth is, that CentOS is not exactly the same as RHEL!
>
Am 03.12.2015 um 22:24 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" :
> CentOS should do whatever RHEL/Upstream does.
>
> Period.
I sometimes misguide myself in doing; CentOS = RHEL, but
the truth is, that CentOS is not exactly the same as RHEL!
> Why the change now? It really does matter, a lot, to those of u
Am 03.12.2015 um 22:28 schrieb Alice Wonder :
> On 12/03/2015 12:53 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Am 03.12.2015 um 19:35 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
>>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
>>>
>>> Note that I was asking about the release numbering, not the release
>>> itself. And
On Thu, December 3, 2015 3:06 pm, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 03.12.2015 um 17:01 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
>> Leon Fauster wrote:
>>> Am 03.12.2015 um 15:40 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Agreed. I don't want "hints", and I'm not doing fedora or ubuntu,
because I don'
On 12/03/2015 11:01 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Sorry, you seem to not have dealt with enough managers who only really
know Windows, or other divisions (esp. ones that are 95% Windows) who
require documentation, etc I can live with the x.y.yymm, but not
showing the relation to upstream is a
On 12/03/2015 04:24 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
... ton of work that we have to do for each new release, and we have
depended in the past on the versions matching the RHEL ones. Now, they
don't, and that's wrong.
I would respectfully disagree here, in that my opinion is that relying
on any di
On 12/03/2015 12:53 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 19:35 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
And the way I'd figure this out from the centos website is?
Note that I was asking about the release numbering, not the release
itself. An
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Leon Fauster
wrote:
> Am 03.12.2015 um 19:35 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
> >>>
> >>> And the way I'd figure this out from the centos website is?
> >
> > Note that I was asking about the release numbering,
Am 03.12.2015 um 17:01 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
> Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Am 03.12.2015 um 15:40 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
>>> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> Agreed. I don't want "hints", and I'm not doing fedora or ubuntu,
>>> because I don't want the LATESTGREATESTBLEEDINGEDGETIP, I want
>>> *stabilit
Am 03.12.2015 um 19:35 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
>>>
>>> And the way I'd figure this out from the centos website is?
>
> Note that I was asking about the release numbering, not the release
> itself. And while you're suggesting where I c
On 03/12/2015 19:48, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Duncan Brown wrote:
On 03/12/2015 17:00, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Duncan Brown wrote:
On 03/12/2015 14:29, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Duncan Brown :
On 03/12/2015 13:54, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:4
On Thu, December 3, 2015 1:48 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Duncan Brown wrote:
>> On 03/12/2015 17:00, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Duncan Brown wrote:
On 03/12/2015 14:29, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 03.12.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Duncan Brown :
>> On 03/12/2015 13:54, Jonathan Billings wr
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Thu, December 3, 2015 11:19 am, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:46:10PM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
>>> Here is a couple of pictures,
>>>
>>> http://i.imgur.com/Vqvqn1H.jpg
>>> http://i.imgur.com/WQaz1j9.png
>>>
>>> Any use?
> That is my main compla
Duncan Brown wrote:
> On 03/12/2015 17:00, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Duncan Brown wrote:
>>> On 03/12/2015 14:29, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Duncan Brown :
> On 03/12/2015 13:54, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:44:47PM +, Duncan Brown
On Thu, December 3, 2015 11:19 am, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:46:10PM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
>> Here is a couple of pictures,
>>
>> http://i.imgur.com/Vqvqn1H.jpg
>> http://i.imgur.com/WQaz1j9.png
>>
>> Any use?
>
> So, both of those are just the end of the kernel ca
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
> >> CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') not yet released ...
> >
> > And the way I'd figure this out from the centos website is?
Note that I was asking about the release numbering, not the release
itself. And while you're suggesting where I cou
On 03/12/2015 17:19, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:46:10PM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
Here is a couple of pictures,
http://i.imgur.com/Vqvqn1H.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/WQaz1j9.png
Any use?
So, both of those are just the end of the kernel call trace,
unfortunately, it doesn
On 03/12/2015 17:00, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Duncan Brown wrote:
On 03/12/2015 14:29, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Duncan Brown :
On 03/12/2015 13:54, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:44:47PM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
The last message before it is "s
Duncan Brown wrote:
> On 03/12/2015 14:29, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Am 03.12.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Duncan Brown :
>>> On 03/12/2015 13:54, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:44:47PM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
> The last message before it is "switching to clocksource hpet"
>>
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 04:46:10PM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
> Here is a couple of pictures,
>
> http://i.imgur.com/Vqvqn1H.jpg
> http://i.imgur.com/WQaz1j9.png
>
> Any use?
So, both of those are just the end of the kernel call trace,
unfortunately, it doesn't show what function actually caused
On 03/12/2015 16:17, Fred Wittekind wrote:
On 12/3/2015 5:40 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
On 03/12/2015 10:06, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 10:53 schrieb Duncan Brown :
On 03/12/2015 09:40, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
On 12/03/2015 10:29 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
initramfs is missing...
check
On 03/12/2015 14:29, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Duncan Brown :
On 03/12/2015 13:54, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:44:47PM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
The last message before it is "switching to clocksource hpet"
Then the panic scrolls by
I've no i
Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 03.12.2015 um 15:40 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
>> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, December 3, 2015 4:28 am, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') not yet released ...
>>>
>>> aka 7.2, huh? auka 7.2 wo
On 12/3/2015 5:40 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
On 03/12/2015 10:06, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 10:53 schrieb Duncan Brown :
On 03/12/2015 09:40, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
On 12/03/2015 10:29 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
initramfs is missing...
check if /boot/initramfs-{kernelversion}.img is co
On Thu, December 3, 2015 9:49 am, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 03.12.2015 um 15:40 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
>> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, December 3, 2015 4:28 am, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') not yet released ..
Am 03.12.2015 um 15:40 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, December 3, 2015 4:28 am, Leon Fauster wrote:
>>> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
>>>
>>> CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') not yet released ...
>>
>> aka 7.2, huh? auka 7.2 would be more appropriate IMH
Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 03.12.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Duncan Brown :
>> On 03/12/2015 13:54, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:44:47PM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
The last message before it is "switching to clocksource hpet"
Then the panic scrolls by
I'v
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Thu, December 3, 2015 4:28 am, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
>>> I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent
>>> version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure
>>> out if 7.2 was the
On Thu, December 3, 2015 4:28 am, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
>> I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent
>> version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure
>> out if 7.2 was the tip. 7.1503? Is that 7.2? Be
Am 03.12.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Duncan Brown :
> On 03/12/2015 13:54, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:44:47PM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
>>> The last message before it is "switching to clocksource hpet"
>>>
>>> Then the panic scrolls by
>>>
>>> I've no idea if that counts as
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:06:48PM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
> That's what I figured, but how do I go about getting a copy of it?
>
> Most of it has scrolled by when it's finished
If it's a server or workstation with a serial console, I suggest
connecting it to another computer, set up a serial
On 03/12/2015 13:57, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
On 03/12/2015 13:33, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:29:21AM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
Hi All
After upgrading to 7.2, I'm getting an immediate kernel panic on boot
Dropping back t
On 03/12/2015 13:54, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:44:47PM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
The last message before it is "switching to clocksource hpet"
Then the panic scrolls by
I've no idea if that counts as later or not
It's unlikely to be a panic related to your hardware
On 12/03/2015 04:26 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 11:39 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent
version, but, looking at th
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
> On 03/12/2015 13:33, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:29:21AM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> After upgrading to 7.2, I'm getting an immediate kernel panic on boot
>>>
>>> Dropping back to 3.10.0-229.2
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:44:47PM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
> The last message before it is "switching to clocksource hpet"
>
> Then the panic scrolls by
>
> I've no idea if that counts as later or not
It's unlikely to be a panic related to your hardware clock (HPET =
High Precision Event Time
On 03/12/2015 13:33, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:29:21AM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
Hi All
After upgrading to 7.2, I'm getting an immediate kernel panic on boot
Dropping back to 3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 and the system boots fine
How can I go about diagnosing the prob
On 12/03/2015 02:10 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent
version, but,
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:29:21AM +, Duncan Brown wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> After upgrading to 7.2, I'm getting an immediate kernel panic on boot
>
> Dropping back to 3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 and the system boots fine
>
> How can I go about diagnosing the problem here?
It'd probably help if
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
> > Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
> > > I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent
> > > version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I
On 03/12/2015 11:28, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 11:40 schrieb Duncan Brown :
On 03/12/2015 10:06, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 10:53 schrieb Duncan Brown :
On 03/12/2015 09:40, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
No joy unfortunately, the correct initramfs is there
I tried reinstalling
On 03/12/2015 11:24, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 03/12/15 09:40, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
On 12/03/2015 10:29 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
initramfs is missing...
check if /boot/initramfs-{kernelversion}.img is correctly there, if not
do a "yum reinstall kernel-{version}" and it should be ok !
You might
Am 03.12.2015 um 12:20 schrieb Karanbir Singh :
> On 03/12/15 10:39, Greg Lindahl wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
>>> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
>>>
>>> CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') not yet released ...
>>
>> And the way I'd figure this out
Am 03.12.2015 um 11:40 schrieb Duncan Brown :
> On 03/12/2015 10:06, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Am 03.12.2015 um 10:53 schrieb Duncan Brown :
>>> On 03/12/2015 09:40, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
>>> No joy unfortunately, the correct initramfs is there
>>>
>>> I tried reinstalling just in case, but no chan
Am 03.12.2015 um 11:39 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
>>> I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent
>>> version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to
On 03/12/15 09:40, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
> On 12/03/2015 10:29 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
> initramfs is missing...
> check if /boot/initramfs-{kernelversion}.img is correctly there, if not
> do a "yum reinstall kernel-{version}" and it should be ok !
You might want to also check there is enough di
On 03/12/15 10:39, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
>>> I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent
>>> version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure
On 03/12/2015 10:06, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 03.12.2015 um 10:53 schrieb Duncan Brown :
On 03/12/2015 09:40, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
On 12/03/2015 10:29 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
initramfs is missing...
check if /boot/initramfs-{kernelversion}.img is correctly there, if not do a "yum
reinstall ke
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:28:10AM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
> > I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent
> > version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure
> > out if 7.2 was the tip. 7.1503? Is th
Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl :
> I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent
> version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure
> out if 7.2 was the tip. 7.1503? Is that 7.2? Beats me.
CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') not yet released ...
>
I wanted to help you by making sure that you were on the most recent
version, but, looking at the Centos.org website I was unable to figure
out if 7.2 was the tip. 7.1503? Is that 7.2? Beats me.
https://wiki.centos.org/Download appears to say that 1503 is the
current version.
I *thought* this wac
Am 03.12.2015 um 10:53 schrieb Duncan Brown :
> On 03/12/2015 09:40, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
>> On 12/03/2015 10:29 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
>> initramfs is missing...
>> check if /boot/initramfs-{kernelversion}.img is correctly there, if not do a
>> "yum reinstall kernel-{version}" and it should b
On 03/12/2015 09:40, Bernard Lheureux wrote:
On 12/03/2015 10:29 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
initramfs is missing...
check if /boot/initramfs-{kernelversion}.img is correctly there, if
not do a "yum reinstall kernel-{version}" and it should be ok !
Hi All
After upgrading to 7.2, I'm getting an i
On 12/03/2015 10:29 AM, Duncan Brown wrote:
initramfs is missing...
check if /boot/initramfs-{kernelversion}.img is correctly there, if not
do a "yum reinstall kernel-{version}" and it should be ok !
Hi All
After upgrading to 7.2, I'm getting an immediate kernel panic on boot
Dropping back t
Hi All
After upgrading to 7.2, I'm getting an immediate kernel panic on boot
Dropping back to 3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 and the system boots fine
How can I go about diagnosing the problem here?
thanks
Duncan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.or
96 matches
Mail list logo
