On 05/13/2012 01:18 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/12/2012 05:23 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>>
>> >> knows where to get them. Isn't it overkill to keep a whole repo
snapshot copy when you really just need a way to tell yum the package
On 05/12/2012 05:23 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
> >> knows where to get them. Isn't it overkill to keep a whole repo
>>> snapshot copy when you really just need a way to tell yum the package
>>> versions you want on the 2nd box?
>> Why all the
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>> knows where to get them. Isn't it overkill to keep a whole repo
>> snapshot copy when you really just need a way to tell yum the package
>> versions you want on the 2nd box?
>
> Why all the agida? This isn't difficult:
What is the point
On 5/11/2012 11:34 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Warren Young wrote:
>
>>> If you've included a few programs from EPEL (etc.), do you mirror
>>> that too?
>>
>> Who mentioned mirroring?
>
> How else can you be sure you have all packages needed for some
> arbitrary mi
Can this plugin help?
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/14/html/Software_Management_Guide/ch06s25.html
Mihai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Warren Young wrote:
>>>
>> No, its not what I what. I have multiple boxes but in different
>> locations,
>
> So put the repo server out in the cloud somewhere. Put it on a
> public-facing box the others all have access to, or rent a VPS
> somewhere, or grab some
On 5/11/2012 9:07 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Warren Young wrote:
>>
>>>
There are several solutions to be able to make that happen ... manual
repos yourself, mrepo, spacewalk, etc.
>>>
>>> All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packa
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Warren Young wrote:
>
>>
>>> There are several solutions to be able to make that happen ... manual
>>> repos yourself, mrepo, spacewalk, etc.
>>
>> All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
>> locally which seems like overkill when you
On 5/10/2012 6:52 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> There are several solutions to be able to make that happen ... manual
>> repos yourself, mrepo, spacewalk, etc.
>
> All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
> local
On 05/10/2012 12:36 AM, Gregory Machin wrote:
> Hi.
> At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
> release . I install a 6.0 machine and run yum update , and next thing
> its 6.2 .
>
> I have a requirement where I need machines to only upgrade to even
> numbered sub releas
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>>> All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
>>> locally which seems like overkill when you aren't changing them
>>> locally. Is there any solution tha
The even number is merely selected as a reference point, nothing to do
with stable or unstable .
I'm aiming to create a controlled environment where there is less
that users can do to break their systems ...
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
wrote:
> On 05/10/2012 08:55 AM
On 05/10/2012 09:40 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
>>> locally which seems like overkill when you aren't changing them
>>> locally. Is there any solution that simply lets yo
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
>> locally which seems like overkill when you aren't changing them
>> locally. Is there any solution that simply lets you tell yum not to
>> install any updates new
On May 10, 2012, at 1:36, Gregory Machin wrote:
> I have a requirement where I need machines to only upgrade to even
> numbered sub releases eg: 6.0 , 6.2, 6.4 and only on my approval. But
> will allow updates within a given release.
Others have debated the usefulness of this requirement, so I wo
On 05/10/2012 07:52 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> There are several solutions to be able to make that happen ... manual
>> repos yourself, mrepo, spacewalk, etc.
>>
> All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
> local
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> There are several solutions to be able to make that happen ... manual
> repos yourself, mrepo, spacewalk, etc.
>
All of those that I've investigated make you manage copies of packages
locally which seems like overkill when you aren't chang
On 05/10/2012 08:55 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 05/09/12 10:36 PM, Gregory Machin wrote:
>> I have a requirement where I need machines to only upgrade to even
>> numbered sub releases eg: 6.0 , 6.2, 6.4 and only on my approval.
>
> thats a rather strange requirement. 6.1 is 6.0 with updates rol
On 05/10/2012 04:49 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> On Thursday 10 May 2012 03.58.17 Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 05/10/2012 01:46 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
>>> On Thursday 10 May 2012 17.36.07 Gregory Machin wrote:
Hi.
At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
>>
On Thursday 10 May 2012 03.58.17 Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/10/2012 01:46 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 May 2012 17.36.07 Gregory Machin wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >> At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
> >> release . I install a 6.0 machine and run yum up
On 05/10/2012 01:46 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote:
> On Thursday 10 May 2012 17.36.07 Gregory Machin wrote:
>> Hi.
>> At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
>> release . I install a 6.0 machine and run yum update , and next thing
>> its 6.2 .
>>
>> I have a requirement wh
On 05/09/12 10:36 PM, Gregory Machin wrote:
> I have a requirement where I need machines to only upgrade to even
> numbered sub releases eg: 6.0 , 6.2, 6.4 and only on my approval.
thats a rather strange requirement. 6.1 is 6.0 with updates rolled up.
a more sane requirement would be to only all
On Thursday 10 May 2012 17.36.07 Gregory Machin wrote:
> Hi.
> At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
> release . I install a 6.0 machine and run yum update , and next thing
> its 6.2 .
>
> I have a requirement where I need machines to only upgrade to even
> numbered
Hi.
At the moment it seems my machines just update to the latest current
release . I install a 6.0 machine and run yum update , and next thing
its 6.2 .
I have a requirement where I need machines to only upgrade to even
numbered sub releases eg: 6.0 , 6.2, 6.4 and only on my approval. But
will all
24 matches
Mail list logo
