t;> --
>>
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>>
>>
>> Nux!
>>
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -
>>
>>> From: "FrancisM"
>>> To: "CentOS mailing list"
>&g
years, well worth the
> price.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
>
>
> Nux!
>
> www.nux.ro
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> > From: "FrancisM"
>
> > To: "CentOS mailing list&q
- Original Message -
> From: "FrancisM"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Thursday, 15 December, 2016 15:17:56
> Subject: [CentOS] Alternative to cPanel
> Dear All,
>
> Im looking for alternative for cPanel and somehow I read that the
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 22:16:15 +0100
Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 15/12/2016 alle 15.17 +, FrancisM ha scritto:
> > Im looking for alternative for cPanel and somehow
>
> ISPconfig is open source and work well.
>
> http://www.ispconfig.org/documentation/
>
as is virtualmin - virtual
Il giorno gio, 15/12/2016 alle 15.17 +, FrancisM ha scritto:
> Im looking for alternative for cPanel and somehow
ISPconfig is open source and work well.
http://www.ispconfig.org/documentation/
--
Dario Lesca
(inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 24 Workstation)
_
On 12/15/2016 11:23 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
> I think most of the market is moving towards AWS Elastic Beanstalk,
> OpenShift and Docker. It seems control panels are not really much of a
> thing anymore.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andrew
You are talking about 2 different market segments.
End user single
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 at 02:10, Dave Stevens wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:23:31 +0100
>
> Andrew Holway wrote:
>
>
>
> > I think most of the market is moving towards AWS Elastic Beanstalk,
>
> > OpenShift and Docker. It seems control panels are not really much of a
>
> > thing anymore.
>
> >
>
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 18:23:31 +0100
Andrew Holway wrote:
> I think most of the market is moving towards AWS Elastic Beanstalk,
> OpenShift and Docker. It seems control panels are not really much of a
> thing anymore.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andrew
the people at virtualmin.com don't agree. Neither do I,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:23:31PM +0100, Andrew Holway wrote:
> I think most of the market is moving towards AWS Elastic Beanstalk,
> OpenShift and Docker. It seems control panels are not really much of a
> thing anymore.
For what it's worth, someone just mentioned this on the NYCBUG mailing
I think most of the market is moving towards AWS Elastic Beanstalk,
OpenShift and Docker. It seems control panels are not really much of a
thing anymore.
Cheers,
Andrew
On 15 December 2016 at 16:17, FrancisM wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Im looking for alternative for cPanel and somehow I read that t
Dear All,
Im looking for alternative for cPanel and somehow I read that the 'cwp
control web panel' (http://centos-webpanel.com) and Sentora (
http://www.sentora.ga) is the good alternative for cPanel.
Is there someone using this application and what can you tell about or
recommend.
Thank you al
The bluequartz/blueonyx projects currently target CentOS as its
platform. It is the based off the code used for the old Sun Cobalt
appliances.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
> wants to do
Also check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_hosting_control_panels
--
Stephen Cox
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
> I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
> wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP of my
> own on a Debian box he colo’d running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and custom
> built httpd/mysql/
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
> I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
> wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP of my
> own on a Debian box he colo’d running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and custom
> built httpd/mysql/e
On 2/24/11 2:42 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> Garry, what the OP has asked has a lot todo with CentOS. He's looking
> for a web based management tool-set to manage his CentOS server, by
> the way.
If you just want to manage 'a server' through a web interface, you might like
ClearOS, which is mostly
Am 24.02.11 14:17, schrieb William Warren:
> On 2/23/2011 9:49 AM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
>> wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP
>> of my
>> own on a Debian box he colo'd running a
On 2/23/2011 9:49 AM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP
of my
own on a Debian box he colo'd running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and
custom
built httpd/mysql/etc
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:56 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 02/24/11 12:42 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> My centos system runs apache and php and postgres, and on top of that
> I'm running drupal, and I'm having some problems with my theme template
> CSS. hey, its on centos, shouldn't I discuss that h
On 02/24/11 12:42 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Garry, what the OP has asked has a lot todo with CentOS. He's looking
> for a web based management tool-set to manage his CentOS server, by
> the way.
>
> As per your definition, the list should have been much much quieter
> and stuff like Gnome, KDE, web
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Garry Dale wrote:
> Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
>> Hello all,
>
> Hi, Josh. The CentOS lists are really not the appropriate place for this
> thread. No doubt there are many members of the CentOS community who can
> and will help. However, I'm quite certain that CentOS i
Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
> Hello all,
Hi, Josh. The CentOS lists are really not the appropriate place for this
thread. No doubt there are many members of the CentOS community who can
and will help. However, I'm quite certain that CentOS is wholly separate
from the other, so threads on the CentOS
On Feb 23, 2011, at 2:04 PM, "Trutwin, Joshua" wrote:
>> +1 for Virtualmin.
>> People will brag that it's insecure etc, but it has always done the job for
>> me
>> and I have more than 100 installations of it. I never had security problems
>> because of it.
>
> Thanks for all the posts.
>
> Cu
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
> wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP of my
> own on a Debian box he colo’d running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and custom
>
> > I certainly don't plan to allow access to webmin save for a couple selected
> > IP's and I'm not surprised to see any web application have security
> > vulnerabilities. But if it's on par with something like phpbb as far as
> > security
> > problems go, I'll probably look elsewhere.
> No whe
On 2/23/2011 2:04 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
>> +1 for Virtualmin.
>> People will brag that it's insecure etc, but it has always done the job for
>> me
>> and I have more than 100 installations of it. I never had security problems
>> because of it.
> Thanks for all the posts.
>
> Curious about the
On 2/23/2011 12:18 PM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>
> That one user with more than 100 installations haven't experienced security
> issues with a product doesn't mean that there is no security issues.
>
> It can just as much mean nobody tried to hack any of those installations,
> or that they have tri
> +1 for Virtualmin.
> People will brag that it's insecure etc, but it has always done the job for me
> and I have more than 100 installations of it. I never had security problems
> because of it.
Thanks for all the posts.
Curious about the "people will brag that it's insecure" - is there a poor
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 6:47 PM, John Hinton wrote:
>The Webmin project is very active. If you have
> a problem or perceived bug, and no one else gets around to answering, you
> will normally hear back from Jamie Cameron the man behind it all, within
> hours of making a post. That is very rare the
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:18 PM, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> That one user with more than 100 installations haven't experienced security
> issues with a product doesn't mean that there is no security issues.
I absolutely agree. Didn't want to imply Webmin is "unhackable"; it's
just not that bad as
On 2/23/2011 9:49 AM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
I was leaning towards webmin/virtualmin but thought I'd check with
this list
for any suggestions. Had bad experiences with Plesk from a while
ago so leaving that off the table. We have experience with cPanel
through another fail host, it's ok but
On 11-02-23 09:49 AM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP
of my
own on a Debian box he colo'd running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and
custom
built httpd/mysql/etc
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
> wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP of my
> own on a Debian box he colo’d running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and custom
>
On 23/02/11 16:24, Lucian wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
> +1 for Virtualmin.
> People will brag that it's insecure etc, but it has always done the
> job for me and I have more than 100 installations of it. I never had
> security problems because of it.
That one
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
>
> I was leaning towards webmin/virtualmin but thought I'd check with this list
> for any suggestions. Had bad experiences with Plesk from a while
> ago so leaving that off the table. We have experience with cPanel
> through another fail h
Hello all,
I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP of my
own on a Debian box he colo'd running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and custom
built httpd/mysql/etc (I was young). It worked ok but time to move on a
36 matches
Mail list logo
