Thanks. I'll do it later tonight.
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 12/01/2010 11:54 AM, robert mena wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've being using the 5.2.10 that is in testing in a production
> > environment for more than six months without any problem. I am
> > wondering i
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 13:50 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> All these vulnerabilities except for the last one
> (https://www.redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2010-3870.html /
> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=49687) are fixed in PHP-5.2.14. For this
> one issue you might need to use the patch
Dne 1.12.2010 13:17, Karanbir Singh napsal(a):
> If you file an issue request at bugs.centos.org; i'll investigate
>
> - KB
I'd say the bigger issue is 5.1.6 C4Plus php, which is not maintained
together with C4Plus pecl/pear modules. C4Plus php is installed on many
boxes over the world.
DH
__
Hi,
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 07:54 -0400, robert mena wrote:
> I am wondering if/when we are going to see a 5.2.14 version there and
> if the recently disclosure of a 5.1.6 security update affects the
> 5.2.10 that is in testing.
Red Hat just put out this security alert concerning multiple PHP
vulne
On 12/01/2010 11:54 AM, robert mena wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've being using the 5.2.10 that is in testing in a production
> environment for more than six months without any problem. I am
> wondering if/when we are going to see a 5.2.14 version there and if the
> recently disclosure of a 5.1.6 security u
Hi,
I've being using the 5.2.10 that is in testing in a production environment
for more than six months without any problem. I am wondering if/when we are
going to see a 5.2.14 version there and if the recently disclosure of a
5.1.6 security update affects the 5.2.10 that is in testing.
_
6 matches
Mail list logo
